One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Abby Johnson: Un-spinning the Web of Planned Parenthood ~ Best of Week!!! Don't Miss This!
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 8, 2019 07:34:24   #
fullspinzoo
 
If you want to meet Abby Johnson and not a crock of horse manure from somebody like Kevyn, watch this talk/lecture by Abby Johnson. What a great story!!! Kevyn will tell you that she had a couple of a******ns (no link) and that she worked for Planned Parenthood, and that she was a bad girl or wh**ever, not allowed to seek redemption. He called her a "conservative hypocrite". He is definitely leading the clown car. So here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1Dcw2tJczI Best of the week by far. Please don't miss this. Looking forward to the overly obtuse comments from the head clown.

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 08:22:14   #
Kevyn
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
If you want to meet Abby Johnson and not a crock of horse manure from somebody like Kevyn, watch this talk/lecture by Abby Johnson. What a great story!!! Kevyn will tell you that she had a couple of a******ns (no link) and that she worked for Planned Parenthood, and that she was a bad girl or wh**ever, not allowed to seek redemption. He called her a "conservative hypocrite". He is definitely leading the clown car. So here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1Dcw2tJczI Best of the week by far. Please don't miss this. Looking forward to the overly obtuse comments from the head clown.
If you want to meet Abby Johnson and not a crock o... (show quote)


What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 08:24:54   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


Do you feel that men who owned s***es, then learned the error of their ways, freed their s***es, and fought for the freedom of other s***es were hypocrites too?

It was their constitutional right at the time...

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2019 08:54:33   #
fullspinzoo
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


Your logic SUCKS for lack of a better word! You just don't have a clue do you?

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 09:43:44   #
fullspinzoo
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


Who cares???? Obama not too long ago believed that marriage should be between a man and a woman...and then shortly thereafter, he lit up the White House in "rainbow colors". I guess that makes him a big hypocrite, right?? When Obama does a 180, it's OK, but God heaven forbid if anyone else changes their beliefs in a 40 year period. We know who the REAL hypocrite is!!!

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 09:43:56   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


Idiocy!

You are implying there is no such thing as rehabilitation and reform. You couldn’t be more wrong! Rehabilitation is anything but hypocrisy!

Hypocrisy is you making this claim against an a******nist, but disallowing the same of terrorists coming into our country, or i******s who return time and again and commit crimes in society. Where’s your outrage there, hypocrite?

If you believe it’s hypocritical to claim rehabilitation, then according to your theory NO criminal ought to ever be released back on the streets once they are convicted of a crime! And no rehabilitated criminal ought to ever speak against the specific crimes they committed!

Is that what you believe? No, it’s not, is it? Hypocrite!

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 09:50:19   #
Rose42
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


What you posted is your opinion and nothing more. She realized a******n is k*****g innocent life and took a stand against it. You support k*****g innocent life. There is no sugar coating it with the "pro choice" label. It is what it is.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2019 09:54:30   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
If you want to meet Abby Johnson and not a crock of horse manure from somebody like Kevyn, watch this talk/lecture by Abby Johnson. What a great story!!! Kevyn will tell you that she had a couple of a******ns (no link) and that she worked for Planned Parenthood, and that she was a bad girl or wh**ever, not allowed to seek redemption. He called her a "conservative hypocrite". He is definitely leading the clown car. So here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1Dcw2tJczI Best of the week by far. Please don't miss this. Looking forward to the overly obtuse comments from the head clown.
If you want to meet Abby Johnson and not a crock o... (show quote)


Thanks for those links to Abby Johnson! Factual and scientific! H**ers gonna h**e. It is truly a new low that now a******nists are even admitting the preborn baby is fully human and still want to k**l it.

Dear God have mercy on our country and help us in the fight for life!

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 10:07:36   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


Imagine what this reasoning would like like for a s***e owner who had a change in conscience and freed her s***es and went on to speak up for the rights of s***es before they were outlawed:

Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to operate her family’s business at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal s***es. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?



Get the picture, hypocrite?

Or are you so brain dead with your TDS you no longer have any brains or any heart either?

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 10:13:15   #
fullspinzoo
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Thanks for those links to Abby Johnson! Factual and scientific! H**ers gonna h**e. It is truly a new low that now a******nists are even admitting the preborn baby is fully human and still want to k**l it.

Dear God have mercy on our country and help us in the fight for life!


Thanks for watching. A little long but well worth it. When some on OPP try to paint Abby Johnson as some kind of hypocritical monster who has had an a******n in the past and has no business supporting the pro-life movement because of her past, this argument is absurd, preposterous, weak. Like saying there is no room for redemption, or absolution. Kevyn is losing big time on this argument.

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 10:22:14   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Thanks for watching. A little long but well worth it. When some on OPP try to paint Abby Johnson as some kind of hypocritical monster who has had an a******n in the past and has no business supporting the pro-life movement because of her past, this argument is absurd, preposterous, weak. Like saying there is no room for redemption, or absolution. Kevyn is losing big time on this argument.


Losing AND I’ll wager doesn’t have the integrity to admit it! I hope I’m proven wrong on that. My guess, though, is that he’ll just slither off and act like he wasn’t ever soundly refuted.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2019 10:41:52   #
fullspinzoo
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Losing AND I’ll wager doesn’t have the integrity to admit it! I hope I’m proven wrong on that. My guess, though, is that he’ll just slither off and act like he wasn’t ever soundly refuted.


He's not saying much as of late. And usually he's got opinion in on everything but the weather. I think he has "slithered". I'm sure about the lack of integrity part.

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 11:59:45   #
Kevyn
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Idiocy!

You are implying there is no such thing as rehabilitation and reform. You couldn’t be more wrong! Rehabilitation is anything but hypocrisy!

Hypocrisy is you making this claim against an a******nist, but disallowing the same of terrorists coming into our country, or i******s who return time and again and commit crimes in society. Where’s your outrage there, hypocrite?

If you believe it’s hypocritical to claim rehabilitation, then according to your theory NO criminal ought to ever be released back on the streets once they are convicted of a crime! And no rehabilitated criminal ought to ever speak against the specific crimes they committed!

Is that what you believe? No, it’s not, is it? Hypocrite!
Idiocy! br br You are implying there is no such t... (show quote)
She had absolutely nothing to rehabilitate from or reform of she simply planned her family. What I am condemning her for is trying to deprive other women of the choice to do the same.

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 12:14:15   #
fullspinzoo
 
Kevyn wrote:
She had absolutely nothing to rehabilitate from or reform of she simply planned her family. What I am condemning her for is trying to deprive other women of the choice to do the same.


No~ You called her a hypocrite for having an a******n and then doing a 180 like Obama did on same sex marriage issue. You know first being all for marriage between a man and a woman only and then a couple of years later lighting up the WH like a rainbow Xmas tree. First, she was all for it and working as head of the Houston Planned Parenthood clinic or in some capacity in Houston. She watched as a device like a vacuum cleaner sucked out the parts of human being (a baby) and finally she was disgusted by it and decided to become an advocate for pro-life. You called a hypocrite, remember? You were condemning her for changing her tune, doing a 180.

Reply
Apr 8, 2019 12:19:21   #
fullspinzoo
 
Kevyn wrote:
What I posted is a matter of fact. She exercised her constitutionally protected right to plan her family at two points in her life electing to obtain safe legal a******ns. Currently she is working to deny other women the rights that she herself enjoyed. If this isn’t hypocrisy what is?


She had a change of heart or a change in 'family values' or a change morally, wh**ever.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.