So you think this report will be safe in Congress unreducted???
Apr 5, 2019 03:10:48 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
I beg to differ...Maybe with any other President.....With this President releasing unreducted report to Congress is the same as releasing it to the public...Schity Schiff as soon as he will get this report in his crooked hands,he will take it to the crooked MSM.....NO!!!AG Barr is smarter then this...He knows exactly what is going on..He will release this report redacted in due time!!!!.....You people want him to get in trouble with the law....And he is not going to fall into this trap!!!..Good for him!!1
Apr 5, 2019 04:21:14 #
proud republican wrote:
I beg to differ...Maybe with any other President..... (show quote)
The only way Barr can get in trouble is if he releases a heavily redacted report and it is later discovered that the redactions were purely to protect Trump. The full report is going to have to come out and the more Barr stalls the more it looks like he is trying to protect Trump.
Apr 5, 2019 04:25:52 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
PeterS wrote:
The only way Barr can get in trouble is if he releases a heavily redacted report and it is later discovered that the redactions were purely to protect Trump. The full report is going to have to come out and the more Barr stalls the more it looks like he is trying to protect Trump.
Not going to happen as long as people like Schiff that love mic and MSM so much are in Congress!!!!!...Barr is doing everything by the book...
Apr 5, 2019 04:54:43 #
proud republican wrote:
Not going to happen as long as people like Schiff that love mic and MSM so much are in Congress!!!!!...Barr is doing everything by the book...
By whose book? Watergate, Iran/Contra, and Ken Stars work all were released while exposing the grand jury information they contained. If we followed the book then Nixon would have ended his term, no one could have been touched for Iran/Contra and Clinton couldn't have been impeached.
Presidents aren't supposed to be above the law so the book you are quoting doesn't exist. It's the AG who writes the rules regarding such reports so the "rules" he is following are his own...
Apr 5, 2019 05:02:08 #
PeterS wrote:
The only way Barr can get in trouble is if he releases a heavily redacted report and it is later discovered that the redactions were purely to protect Trump. The full report is going to have to come out and the more Barr stalls the more it looks like he is trying to protect Trump.
For two years we have listened to and paid a group of Trump h**ers and after 2 years of, let's just say stretching the t***h they have found zip, null, zero, zilch. Give it a rest, it's Trump's turn and his administration is not the gutless Republicans in Congress. Let's hope they are as criminal and underhanded as Democrats, close up the loose ends fast, and start putting the players in federal prisons.
Apr 5, 2019 06:54:42 #
proud republican wrote:
I beg to differ...Maybe with any other President..... (show quote)
But the i***t Pumpkinfuhrer is as pure as the driven snow and the report will fully exonerate him, what on earth could Mr. Schiff leak that would harm him?
Apr 6, 2019 10:17:39 #
proud republican wrote:
I beg to differ...Maybe with any other President..... (show quote)
Amen and Amen
Apr 6, 2019 11:32:08 #
PeterS wrote:
The only way Barr can get in trouble is if he releases a heavily redacted report and it is later discovered that the redactions were purely to protect Trump. The full report is going to have to come out and the more Barr stalls the more it looks like he is trying to protect Trump.
You even flunked lunch at law school, didn't you? What he is able to release will be determined by the laws on the books, not some misplaced loyalty you seem to think he is laboring under. What he releases will be what's legally allowable, no more and no less. Now, will you quit with the bloviation, it gets irritating after a few thousand times.
Apr 6, 2019 15:23:03 #
proud republican wrote:
I beg to differ...Maybe with any other President..... (show quote)
I agree with you 100% And if it wasn't Schiff lol it would be Nadler. Remember "we have to convince America that Trump should be impeached first"? Not only won't the AG allow it, the good ones in gov't. won't. They are saving the demos from themselves. Grand Jury stuff is illegal to see as is classified and no the demos aren't cleared to determine what's okay. Personally, I don't care if I never see it, it was a crock from the very beginning.
Apr 6, 2019 17:07:29 #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Personally, I don't care if I never see it, it was a crock from the very beginning.
Indeed it was. Little more than a diversion.
Apr 6, 2019 18:24:40 #
proud republican wrote:
Not going to happen as long as people like Schiff that love mic and MSM so much are in Congress!!!!!...Barr is doing everything by the book...
You do realize that his "book" says that a sitting president cannot be indicted, so then any information that would lead to that should not be given to congress, should be withheld since they can't prosecute?
Barr has the latitude to go a number of ways he has the ability to go, it is rather obvious he has a bias toward protecting the president rather than seeing justice done. By the book? He can be adhering to the book and release it to congress if he chooses, he can leave it up to congress to decide what to do with the information considering Barr's hand's are tied from indicting a sitting president. Congress's hands are not tied from impeaching him if the facts prove that should be necessary, but they have a need to see the unredacted information. If they leak so what, the public can see it too if they want to see the proof.
Apr 6, 2019 18:27:17 #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Personally, I don't care if I never see it, it was a crock from the very beginning.
The only way we'll know is to see it, the majority of the country wants to see what's there and make up their own minds, it's the right that is content to keep their heads buried and go on right wing rhetoric rather than facts.
Apr 6, 2019 18:28:16 #
woodguru wrote:
If they leak so what, the public can see it too if they want to see the proof.
Because that's how people die, that's so what. These laws are in place for some very good and specific reasons. If they are not followed, that will be a whole new can of worms and it won't be pretty.
Apr 6, 2019 18:32:53 #
woodguru wrote:
[T]he majority
That's irrelevant. 'The majority' can go pound sand.
Apr 7, 2019 06:38:06 #
PeterS wrote:
The only way Barr can get in trouble is if he releases a heavily redacted report and it is later discovered that the redactions were purely to protect Trump. The full report is going to have to come out and the more Barr stalls the more it looks like he is trying to protect Trump.
Mueller is working with Barr on making the redactions. Lets wait to see the redacted report first. After that has been reviewed by Congress, they can always request an unredacted report from a judge and let the court decide if an unredacted report should be released. If an unredacted report goes to Congress as a confidential document, it will be leaked to the press in 5 minutes time.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.