maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
nwtk2007 wrote:
I DO understand that. The question is if this is real news or f**e news.
It doesn't matter if it's real or f**e. If it's f**e but the liberals like it, then it's true. BUT, if it's true and the liberals don't like it, then it's f**e. You'll never convince any of the libs otherwise. You KNOW they are really smart because they are never wrong...just ask them.
maximus wrote:
It doesn't matter if it's real or f**e. If it's f**e but the liberals like it, then it's true. BUT, if it's true and the liberals don't like it, then it's f**e. You'll never convince any of the libs otherwise. You KNOW they are really smart because they are never wrong...just ask them.
Ok cool, but what do YOU think??
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
nwtk2007 wrote:
Ok cool, but what do YOU think??
From my short research, it looks to me like it's the t***h, making it honest journalism. If the t***h is told, how can it not be honest? Woodguru laughed at TrueAmerican for saying he believed in the Breitbart.com, while just a short while ago, he said exactly the same thing about an MSNBC Trump h**er, Lawrence O'Donnell, which WE all laughed at.
So, that's my belief...what do you believe? It's kinda confusing...is the article real or f**e ( I v**e real), or is breitbart.com real or f**e ( I v**e real). Your v**es?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.