In the information Mueller was given no collusion was found. BUT that doesn't mean there was no collusion it means there is probably information out there that will prove collusion it,s not been brought forward yet
Mbhorad wrote:
In the information Mueller was given no collusion was found. BUT that doesn't mean there was no collusion it means there is probably information out there that will prove collusion it,s not been brought forward yet
You missed the entire meaning of the post!
Mbhorad wrote:
In the information Mueller was given no collusion was found. BUT that doesn't mean there was no collusion it means there is probably information out there that will prove collusion it,s not been brought forward yet
So Mueller was too stupid to find this information even though he had two years to do it
Do you not see the blatant stupefaction you just posted ?
Well as soon as you find it, file the proper charges and provide the evidence.
Meanwhile, we're moving on to investigate the 'real' crooks.
Mbhorad wrote:
In the information Mueller was given no collusion was found. BUT that doesn't mean there was no collusion it means there is probably information out there that will prove collusion it,s not been brought forward yet
You TDS victims are like laboratory rats, you've been subjugated to so much MSM bullbiden, that you can't realize the t***h.
Your capacity for logic, t***h and discernment has been crushed.
Mbhorad wrote:
In the information Mueller was given no collusion was found. BUT that doesn't mean there was no collusion it means there is probably information out there that will prove collusion it,s not been brought forward yet
Wrong~ What it means is there was NO PROOF of collusion. There may have been collusion, but there is no evidence to prove it. It does NOT mean or infer there is "probably information out there that will prove collusion, it's not been brought forward yet." That is a false statement, i.e. an outright LIE.
And BTW, how about the Democrats colluding with Steele to ram the f**e dossier down our throats? Now THERE's PROVABLE collusion.
Iliamna1 wrote:
Wrong~ What it means is there was NO PROOF of collusion. There may have been collusion, but there is no evidence to prove it. It does NOT mean or infer there is "probably information out there that will prove collusion, it's not been brought forward yet." That is a false statement, i.e. an outright LIE.
And BTW, how about the Democrats colluding with Steele to ram the f**e dossier down our throats? Now THERE's PROVABLE collusion.
It's all bullmueller. The story of collusion was hatched within hours after hilliar's joyful loss to President Donald J Trump. John (password) Pedersta and Robbie the Mook drew up the excuse that the Russians did it both to mitigate their humiliating loss and also, also to cover up the Seth Rich murder. The Russians didn't hack Pederesta, Seth Rich sent a thumbnail to Wikileaks and was Fostered for it. They then blamed Russia, for everything, and all of Washington DC supported the lies and treated them with dignity and legitimacy. That is a c**p, orchestrated by hundreds of t*****rs.
And no one does anything about it.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
It's all bullmueller. The story of collusion was hatched within hours after hilliar's joyful loss to President Donald J Trump. John (password) Pedersta and Robbie the Mook drew up the excuse that the Russians did it both to mitigate their humiliating loss and also, also to cover up the Seth Rich murder. The Russians didn't hack Pederesta, Seth Rich sent a thumbnail to Wikileaks and was Fostered for it. They then blamed Russia, for everything, and all of Washington DC supported the lies and treated them with dignity and legitimacy. That is a c**p, orchestrated by hundreds of t*****rs.
And no one does anything about it.
It's all bullmueller. The story of collusion was h... (
show quote)
The very tragic thing about your post is that . . . ever word is true and provable for the most part. But the lamestream media won't touch it with a 100-foot pole.
Mbhorad wrote:
In the information Mueller was given no collusion was found. BUT that doesn't mean there was no collusion it means there is probably information out there that will prove collusion it,s not been brought forward yet
"In the information Mueller was given", you say? You have a very warped sense of "giving".
More than 2,800 subpoenas issued by the Special Counsel's office,
that's an average of at least four per day.
Nearly 500 search warrants executed.
More than 230 orders for communication records.
Nearly 50 authorized orders for the use of pen registers, a tool that lets the government know who someone is communicating with and when, but not what they said.
13 evidence requests to foreign governments
500 witnesses interviewed
$25 million in posted costs as of February.
Mueller report: Investigation found no evidence Trump conspired with Russia.
Gatsby wrote:
"In the information Mueller was given", you say? You have a very warped sense of "giving".
More than 2,800 subpoenas issued by the Special Counsel's office,
that's an average of at least four per day.
Nearly 500 search warrants executed.
More than 230 orders for communication records.
Nearly 50 authorized orders for the use of pen registers, a tool that lets the government know who someone is communicating with and when, but not what they said.
13 evidence requests to foreign governments
500 witnesses interviewed
$25 million in posted costs as of February.
Mueller report: Investigation found no evidence Trump conspired with Russia.
"In the information Mueller was given", ... (
show quote)
Mueller drove up those legal tallies for a reason. Those numbers rattled off from memory by every kommiecrat worth his coexist sticker give legitimacy to an actual c**p. Oh, he indicted Trump's campaign manager and many other people close to Trump. (for unrelated made up crimes) That's a crime in itself, and I hope that when the time comes, Mueller is treated as harshly as possible.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.