One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
YOU WILL NOT HEAR ABOUT THIS FROM THE PRESS OR ON TV
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 2, 2019 11:30:22   #
BearK Loc: TN
 
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 11:35:16   #
debeda
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)


Good article, thanks for sharing!!!

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 11:47:13   #
Carol Kelly
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)


I had no idea of this law clerk thing. Of course, it should never have existed. Who conceived this plan? I hope and pray that schools will obey this edict.
This is the reason we need OPP Forum. It’s educational.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2019 12:02:29   #
Ricktloml
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)


Appalling that this isn't unanimous. Sickening that it's not surprising the activist judges, (who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution, care so little about it,) don't v**e their oaths, they v**e their left-wing politics

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 12:09:58   #
debeda
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Appalling that this isn't unanimous. Sickening that it's not surprising the activist judges, (who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution, care so little about it,) don't v**e their oaths, they v**e their left-wing politics



Reply
Apr 2, 2019 12:28:13   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
Now let me get this straight. A first year law clerk is reviewing briefs and he/she is forwarding the ones they think are worthy to the Justices? That's about the goofiest thing I have ever heard of.

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 12:35:08   #
debeda
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Now let me get this straight. A first year law clerk is reviewing briefs and he/she is forwarding the ones they think are worthy to the Justices? That's about the goofiest thing I have ever heard of.


AGREED

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2019 12:42:50   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)
Thank you for the important info, BearK. Imagine where we'd be if HRC had won and slanted SCOTUS even further left? And of course we're hearing about needing to "expand" the number of justices so that the next Democrat to win the Presidency can nullify what President Trump has accomplished. I wish RBG no ill will, but I'm counting the days until she retires or expires so that we can solve the Anthony Kennedy problem. And I say that because I want SCOTUS to decide it's cases constitutionally, rather than based on emotion or how things need to change in order to follow a progressive agenda.
Just had another thought. This reminds me of what's going on in congress now. Who reads the voluminous bills presented any more? It's mostly staff, since the politicians are forever fund-raising. Of course if you're a Democrat, you just wait for the memo from Schulosi, right? How often does the congressperson v**e with a full understanding of the bill in question? I'm betting it's a really low number. It's time we got back to what the situation should be.

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 12:46:37   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)


Hallelujah and thank God for the blessings of the supreme court!
As It should be, no less.

So glad to see you I’ve missed you and your wonderful posts. I hope all is well with you and that you were in the healthiest condition possible. Miss you much love you more....

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 12:58:17   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Fit2BTied wrote:
Thank you for the important info, BearK. Imagine where we'd be if HRC had won and slanted SCOTUS even further left? And of course we're hearing about needing to "expand" the number of justices so that the next Democrat to win the Presidency can nullify what President Trump has accomplished. I wish RBG no ill will, but I'm counting the days until she retires or expires so that we can solve the Anthony Kennedy problem. And I say that because I want SCOTUS to decide it's cases constitutionally, rather than based on emotion or how things need to change in order to follow a progressive agenda.
Just had another thought. This reminds me of what's going on in congress now. Who reads the voluminous bills presented any more? It's mostly staff, since the politicians are forever fund-raising. Of course if you're a Democrat, you just wait for the memo from Schulosi, right? How often does the congressperson v**e with a full understanding of the bill in question? I'm betting it's a really low number. It's time we got back to what the situation should be.
Thank you for the important info, BearK. Imagine ... (show quote)


Unless they have a personal interest in passage for their special interest group you can bet little involvement of them..

Not that any on criminal hill have the true Capacity of comprehension, followed by an actual informed decision... Didn’t we have to pass Obamacare the find out what it said????

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 13:02:22   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)


Great article and very informative. Thank you. So close. I wonder how Obama's candidate, Merrick Garland, would have v**ed?

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2019 13:06:51   #
Rose42
 
BearK wrote:
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS “cert pool.”
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court’s law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation. The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.

The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking v**e of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:

“The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn’t a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!

Liberals are all about teaching Islam and Sharia Law but they have issues with “Under God” in the pledge of allegiance and “In God We Trust” on our currency.

This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don’t care about the Constitution, nor our values.

Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.

Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great se******n by President Trump.
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court fo... (show quote)


Do you have a link for this?

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 13:06:57   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Now let me get this straight. A first year law clerk is reviewing briefs and he/she is forwarding the ones they think are worthy to the Justices? That's about the goofiest thing I have ever heard of.


Technically it starts with them but goes up the line to those of the seated Justice.. By that I mean those they brought in to assist the Judge..

Did you know The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship....A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law. Many of the 18th and 19th century Justices studied law under a mentor because there were few law schools in the country...

Almost all federal judges have at least one law clerk; many have two or more. Associate Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are allowed four clerks. Although the Chief Justice is allowed to hire five clerks, Chief Justice Rehnquist hired only three per year, and Chief Justice Roberts usually hires only four.

A law clerk or a judicial clerk is an individual,generally an attorney, who provides direct assistance and counsel to a judge in making legal determinations and in writing opinions by researching issues before the court....

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 15:10:54   #
Carol Kelly
 
lindajoy wrote:
Technically it starts with them but goes up the line to those of the seated Justice.. By that I mean those they brought in to assist the Judge..

Did you know The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship....A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law. Many of the 18th and 19th century Justices studied law under a mentor because there were few law schools in the country...

Almost all federal judges have at least one law clerk; many have two or more. Associate Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are allowed four clerks. Although the Chief Justice is allowed to hire five clerks, Chief Justice Rehnquist hired only three per year, and Chief Justice Roberts usually hires only four.

A law clerk or a judicial clerk is an individual,generally an attorney, who provides direct assistance and counsel to a judge in making legal determinations and in writing opinions by researching issues before the court....
Technically it starts with them but goes up the li... (show quote)


Good information and in answer to another post, no one makes this stuff up. No proof no matter.

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 15:11:07   #
Carol Kelly
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
Good information and in answer to another post, no one makes this stuff up. No proof no matter.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.