Just for the sake of argument...
Mar 29, 2019 22:58:05 #
So. Turns out that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, NEW YORK TIMES AND most of the rest of the "legacy media" has been screaming a conspiracy theory - yes I said a conspiracy theory, which is being proven as one - from their VERY, VERY public platforms for two and a half years. Hmmmm. What makes them different than Alex Jones and infowars, which was de-platformed and wiped from the sight of the public, ostensibly for pushing a conspiracy theory? What is the consequence to these people for trumpeting a conspiracy theory against the President of the United States daily, all day, every day for 900+ days to 10s of millions of people, all of whom trusted them to be honest and T***HFUL? And ripping this country apart in the process? Or what makes Rachel maddow any different from Roseanne Barr? Maddow demeaned, dehumanized, belittled, and called our POTUS illegitimate more than anyone - for 900+ days. Roseanne Barr made a joke about a former political appointee - once. Roseanne Barr lost her life's work. What is Rachel maddows consequence? Just wondering, y'all......
Mar 29, 2019 23:43:18 #
debeda wrote:
So. Turns out that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, NEW ... (show quote)
At least she's lost a significantly large percentage of her viewers since Mueller threw in the towel. Maybe the l*****t shill will lose enough that her program won't be worth the ad space and they'll send her packing.
Mar 29, 2019 23:45:45 #
Seth wrote:
At least she's lost a significantly large percentage of her viewers since Mueller threw in the towel. Maybe the l*****t shill will lose enough that her program won't be worth the ad space and they'll send her packing.
TRUE. But really not good enough. And not remotely equitable compared to what happens to conservatives. But perhaps the best we can hope for
Mar 30, 2019 00:10:35 #
debeda wrote:
TRUE. But really not good enough. And not remotely equitable compared to what happens to conservatives. But perhaps the best we can hope for
Oh, what I hope for where these %€π!& are concerned would probably get me in major trouble if I gave voice to it.
Like the old Bob Dylan line,
"If my thought dreams could be seen
they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
Mar 30, 2019 00:14:07 #
Seth wrote:
Oh, what I hope for where these %€π!& are concerned would probably get me in major trouble if I gave voice to it.
Like the old Bob Dylan line,
"If my thought dreams could be seen
they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
Like the old Bob Dylan line,
"If my thought dreams could be seen
they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
Mar 30, 2019 04:07:54 #
debeda wrote:
So. Turns out that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, NEW ... (show quote)
When did you, or any conservative Trump apologist, start listening to mainstream media? It's fine to bust their chops if they get something wrong but we haven't seen the Mueller report yet and according to Barr the report we eventually will see is going to be so redacted that we won't know up from down.
As for the difference between Racheal Maddow and Rosanne Barr--the first forms opinions based the facts surrounding the case and the second forms opinions based on whether they agree with the proposition stated. With Maddow you have confirmation vs affirmation for Barr.
Mar 30, 2019 04:23:58 #
Mar 30, 2019 09:24:30 #
PeterS wrote:
When did you, or any conservative Trump apologist,... (show quote)
Wrong.
We conservatives do take the occasional gander at the mainstream media. It gives us an idea of how badly less informed Americans are being propagandized and what the lies of the day, ie F**e News® happen to be.
Then we go to real news venues to learn what is actually happening.
I would like to answer your second paragraph, but it is so convoluted that I would need to take some of wh**ever it is you are taking (is it Dr. Leary approved?) in order to know what you're talking about.
Mar 30, 2019 10:07:28 #
Mar 30, 2019 13:28:26 #
debeda wrote:
So. Turns out that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, NEW ... (show quote)
Is it any difference than all the conspiracy theory about Obama for 8 years
Mar 30, 2019 13:34:14 #
Lonewolf wrote:
Is it any difference than all the conspiracy theory about Obama for 8 years
The only difference is that everything said about B. Hussein Obama was true.
Mar 30, 2019 14:45:40 #
Seth wrote:
The only difference is that everything said about B. Hussein Obama was true.
And most of the MSM rhapsodized over his every word and gesture
Mar 30, 2019 15:26:47 #
debeda wrote:
And most of the MSM rhapsodized over his every word and gesture
I had just arrived in L.A. for a conference when Obama was inaugurated, and there was a DJ on the local classic Rock station who did just that, rhapsodized on and on about it as though the Messiah had arrived or he was a lovesick teenager mooning over his female idol; it was so sickening that I finally changed the station.
Mar 30, 2019 15:34:10 #
Seth wrote:
I had just arrived in L.A. for a conference when Obama was inaugurated, and there was a DJ on the local classic Rock station who did just that, rhapsodized on and on about it as though the Messiah had arrived or he was a lovesick teenager mooning over his female idol; it was so sickening that I finally changed the station.
YEP. Anyone who tries to compare what Prez Trump has endured for the past two and a half years to the limited criticism of Obama that was allowed is out of their gourd IMO
Mar 30, 2019 15:44:47 #
debeda wrote:
YEP. Anyone who tries to compare what Prez Trump has endured for the past two and a half years to the limited criticism of Obama that was allowed is out of their gourd IMO
But try to get one of them to admit it, they'll deny it. Just ask Kevyn or any of the other TDS victims here at OPP.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.