Noraa wrote:
Yes, but he was appointed to the special counsel by the dem's.
NO, the Dems wanted an investigation but had nothing at all to do with any appointments. the GOP held all of government..
https://www.npr.org/2017/05/17/528846598/former-fbi-director-mueller-appointed-special-counsel-to-oversee-russia-probehe Justice Department is appointing former FBI Director Robert Mueller as a special counsel to oversee the growing probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 e******n and possible ties to associates of President Trump.
"In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter," Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in a statement.
OH really, What drugs are you taking?
permafrost wrote:
NO, the Dems wanted an investigation but had nothing at all to do with any appointments. the GOP held all of government..
https://www.npr.org/2017/05/17/528846598/former-fbi-director-mueller-appointed-special-counsel-to-oversee-russia-probehe Justice Department is appointing former FBI Director Robert Mueller as a special counsel to oversee the growing probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 e******n and possible ties to associates of President Trump.
"In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter," Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in a statement.
NO, the Dems wanted an investigation but had nothi... (
show quote)
permafrost wrote:
Mueller is a republican who was appointed by a republican...
.......and then Mueller appointed 13 registered Democrats (6 of whom contributed to the Clinton campaign), and 3 members who were unaffiliated with a party (but all 3 of whom also contributed to Clinton) to be on his investigation team. The only Republican on the team was him.
And they STILL found no collusion.....
bmac32 wrote:
OH really, What drugs are you taking?
Are you truly questioning or opposed to honesty and t***h??
My drugs are pretty run of the mill.. BP, Station, a head pill and one more for night time breaks..
What are your drugs?
Head pill?
OH maybe an aspirin once in awhile.
permafrost wrote:
Are you truly questioning or opposed to honesty and t***h??
My drugs are pretty run of the mill.. BP, Station, a head pill and one more for night time breaks..
What are your drugs?
permafrost wrote:
Are you truly questioning or opposed to honesty and t***h??
My drugs are pretty run of the mill.. BP, Station, a head pill and one more for night time breaks..
What are your drugs?
The main difference is that the deep state and it's henchmen were out to get Trump from the moment he put his hat into the ring. They are ruthless and will stop at nothing. Did you notice how the media has shifted it their focus now that Mueller has given him a pass? They are in lock step with their changes. I wonder who coordinates their quick changes of tactics when one proves ineffective.
EmilyD wrote:
.......and then Mueller appointed 13 registered Democrats (6 of whom contributed to the Clinton campaign), and 3 members who were unaffiliated with a party (but all 3 of whom also contributed to Clinton) to be on his investigation team. The only Republican on the team was him.
And they STILL found no collusion.....
The did not find evidence that would hold up in court. that is one of the finest points in our justice system the degree of proof is quite high.. far beyond the apparent obvious facts seen in videos and recordings..
Mueller is indeed a very strong Republican, but he is required by law to have a diversified team..
permafrost wrote:
The did not find evidence that would hold up in court. that is one of the finest points in our justice system the degree of proof is quite high.. far beyond the apparent obvious facts seen in videos and recordings..
Mueller is indeed a very strong Republican, but he is required by law to have a diversified team..
Are you serious? That is one of the dumbest statements of the week.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
The main difference is that the deep state and it's henchmen were out to get Trump from the moment he put his hat into the ring. They are ruthless and will stop at nothing. Did you notice how the media has shifted it their focus now that Mueller has given him a pass? They are in lock step with their changes. I wonder who coordinates their quick changes of tactics when one proves ineffective.
Bernie, i have said it before, but will say it again..
It amazes my that a crowd of people who v**ed in a life long 3rd generation criminal con man can even find the balls to criticizes the investigation of him which was so very obvious.. well founded and in fact needed for our nation..
media shifted its focus? You mean because trump bugled that he would remove the ACA from the face of America?
He seems to be the one who has no wish to talk about the investigation and possible future repercussions..
considering that Mueller specified that the report did not exonerate trump from obstruction of justice, I think the future may very well hold some dire days for you man trump.
As from day one, what ever trump mutters becomes the press story of the day/week.. and he very much knows that..
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Are you serious? That is one of the dumbest statements of the week.
Which particular statement of mine do you so strongly disagree with??
permafrost wrote:
Which particular statement of mine do you so strongly disagree with??
Well,Perm, most of them but particularly, the statement that it has to hold up in court and that Mueller has to have a diversified team. I suppose you mean the Democrats like Peter Strocyk or Lisa Page or Andy McCabe any all of the Obama holdovers. You can't be listening to yourself or watching what has been going on lately. The press has done a complete 90 degree turn from Russiagate to: You watch CNN and MSNBC and see if you can discern what they are stuck on now. Tune in later for more from the MSM!!!
permafrost wrote:
The did not find evidence that would hold up in court. that is one of the finest points in our justice system the degree of proof is quite high.. far beyond the apparent obvious facts seen in videos and recordings..
Mueller is indeed a very strong Republican, but he is required by law to have a diversified team..
If he is required by law to have a diversified team, why was he the only Republican on it? He appointed 13 registered Democrats, and 3 who had no party affiliation - but all 3 of whom donated to Hillary's campaign. 6 of the registered Democrats also contributed to Hillary.
So tell me....how is that diversified?
EmilyD wrote:
If he is required by law to have a diversified team, why was he the only Republican on it? He appointed 13 registered Democrats, and 3 who had no party affiliation - but all 3 of whom donated to Hillary's campaign. 6 of the registered Democrats also contributed to Hillary.
So tell me....how is that diversified?
It isn't! He doesn't know what he's talking about.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.