Louis wrote:
I might not be the brightest person on the planet, but, I would like you to explain to me exactly how a tweet can prove obstruction? I think one needs something a little more substantial than a tweet to be charged with the crime of obstruction. I think maybe you got a little carried away on that one.
Constantly attacking the investigation, and the press and his attacks on Mueller and the angry democrats. That's more than enough look at how he attacked Jeff sesions for
refusing to have anything to do with it. The things trump said of sessions made it clear trump wanted sessions to k**l the investigation.