One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
trump might not be on the b****t in 18 states
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Mar 21, 2019 18:45:40   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
byronglimish wrote:
Yep, Steeles old boss Scarlett was at a national security symposium in Washington last week and cleared things up about the unverified dossier content.


So far I saw one video of him from that conference, the audio got more and more quiet as he spoke like the microphone was being drawn away from him and then it nearly blew my eardrums out when the interviewer spoke again as I was turning the volume up to hear. I have to wonder why the interviewer would be drawing the microphone further from the interviewee if what he was saying were so important, perhaps he wasn't saying anything they wanted to hear.

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 20:09:27   #
Lonewolf
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
I'll just bet you can back that up with facts rather than opinions. BTW, how many of these "convictions" had to do with the non-existent "collusion" Mueller was supposed to be investigating.


Mueller was investigating Russian interference in our e******ns

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 20:14:20   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Mueller was investigating Russian interference in our e******ns


NO...We already know Russia interfered in our e******ns..Mueller is supposed to investigate Russian collusion-Delusion H**x!!!...

Reply
 
 
Mar 21, 2019 20:17:37   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Mueller was investigating Russian interference in our e******ns


His objective was to cover the Obama/Clinton treachery and pollute the Trump Presidency.

That's why he will keep churning and serving the koolaid until the next e******n.

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 20:48:52   #
maryjane
 
77Reaganite wrote:
And I guarantee you he sues all 18 states and what are the chances that all 18 states are all Democrat I'll tell you that's probably a 100% chance of that so I got news for these people they can't exclude Trump as much as they want would like because he is the sitting president and since he is the sitting president his name will be on the b****ts you can believe that so wh**ever these so-called far-left groups are trying to do it's not going to down work Trump's going to see who in Trump's going to win because Trump's the president so they're going to have to get used to losing that court case
And I guarantee you he sues all 18 states and what... (show quote)


He, himself, should NOT have to sue these states. The federal government should sue, and soon. States should not be allowed to take any such actions that would have such an impact on p**********l e******ns, thus nullifying the v**es of other citizens/states. Our country has gone crazy.

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 21:32:20   #
Lonewolf
 
maryjane wrote:
He, himself, should NOT have to sue these states. The federal government should sue, and soon. States should not be allowed to take any such actions that would have such an impact on p**********l e******ns, thus nullifying the v**es of other citizens/states. Our country has gone crazy.


States do have rights

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 21:37:00   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I see that your brain has gone into safe mode, please reboot and re-post. A proper response will be you providing facts to support your claim that Christopher Steele is NOT a "respectable ex-member of the intelligence community". If you fail to show proof that he isn't, you only prove yourself to be the troll that I am certain that you are.


You said my intelligence was suspect. I pointed out that your own is demonstrably lacking, as is evidenced in everything you post. As for the other.....
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/08/just_how_reliable_was_christopher_steele.html
https://www.dailywire.com/news/44806/christopher-steeles-former-mi6-boss-slams-trump-ashe-schow
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/christopher-steele-admits-dossier-charge-unverifie/

Reply
 
 
Mar 21, 2019 21:41:27   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Lonewolf wrote:
States do have rights


So do individual cities, you could go to S.F. and land a big ol turd on a busy sidewalk, pull your pants back up without using toilet paper and be on your merry way to the closest designated dope shooting camp.

But if your dog drops a pile of Biden on the same spot and you do not pick it up, the fine is 320°°

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 21:44:44   #
maryjane
 
Lonewolf wrote:
States do have rights


Yes, they do and, in my opinion, the congresses have wrested many rights away from states, rights that should be returned to them. Nevertheless, the states do not have the right to disobey federal laws and they do not have the right to take actions coercing the president to reveal anything nor actions against the wishes of their v**ers in federal p**********l e******ns and negating other states/citizens v**es.

Reply
Mar 21, 2019 22:52:56   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 


I have looked into those, watched the attached video on one of the sites I checked into it on and the video had the interviewer slowly drawing the microphone back away from him while he spoke making what he was saying unintelligible, I suspect because he wasn't getting his hoped for response, and as such, without verifiable proof that he said what they claim he said, I will choose to continue to disbelieve it, thank you very much.

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 00:01:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I have looked into those, watched the attached video on one of the sites I checked into it on and the video had the interviewer slowly drawing the microphone back away from him while he spoke making what he was saying unintelligible, I suspect because he wasn't getting his hoped for response, and as such, without verifiable proof that he said what they claim he said, I will choose to continue to disbelieve it, thank you very much.


You would disbelieve that the sun rises in the East if it did not fit your myopic and parochial agenda. You let your dislike of Trump cloud your judgement. Like your pathetic attempt to refute my use of 8 USC 1182 as a cite by using an amendment that has nothing to do with p**********l plenary powers. You see, sometimes it takes more than a Cliff Note type entry from Wikipedia. I know that's about your limit. You are full of suggestions for other people, here is one for you. Learn how to look up laws and statutes, rather than depending on Wikipedia to explain the big words.

Reply
 
 
Mar 22, 2019 14:59:05   #
peg w
 
Trump may not be on the b****t in 50 states.

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 15:05:30   #
Lonewolf
 
peg w wrote:
Trump may not be on the b****t in 50 states.



thats most likely the way it will be I don't think pence will be there either

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 15:06:16   #
Lonewolf
 
bidden Obama

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 15:19:33   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Lonewolf wrote:
bidden Obama


How about Wiener and Holder? 😂

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.