One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The eyes of Occasio-Cortez.
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Mar 7, 2019 13:03:40   #
johnsorrell7
 
This is the same bimbo that was whining about not having enough money, to rent an apartment to go with her new job. She didn't need near the digs, when she was a dumb bartender. Can you just imagine what the clients that bellied up o the bar, had to listen to from this i***t???
The less attention we give her, the less face time she will get, and that's what keeps her going. No body could be that stupid on purpose.

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 13:24:39   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Kevyn wrote:
I get a hoot how this pretty energetic go getter gets under the right wing nutters skin!

You get a hoot out of successfully tying your laces in the morning.

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 14:27:37   #
Curmudgeon
 
Just like you claim the conservatives love the "crazy ladies", those of us who can actually think and reason love the Jim Jordan's, Kevin McCarthy's, Mitch McConnell's, Lindsay Graham's, etc. Their magical raving and endless lying make them the perfect compliment for the Fat Liar in the White House and show the world why he doesn't belong there.

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2019 16:15:25   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Some of you, about 99% do not seem to understand that this is a resolution.. not any kind of legal bill moving through or proposed to congress or the senate..

It falls in the same file as Newt Gingrich's "contract with america" in 1994..

So I have wondered if anyone is questioning how the actual words in this resolution compare to the information you think is in it as given by your orange blimp and the right wing press..

Out of a choice of dozens of articles, I choose one from Politifact. as good as any.. part is below and i will post the link..

If you should look beyond my posted words, you will see that most of your ridicule was posted by interns. probable college kids doing a funny in their eyes..




https://www.politifact.com/t***h-o-meter/article/2019/feb/12/seven-questions-about-green-new-deal/

What is the "Green New Deal"?
Officially, the Green New Deal is a House resolution that Ocasio-Cortez introduced on Feb. 7, 2019, following months of discussion among progressive lawmakers and activists. There’s also a companion measure in the Senate, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and co-sponsored by nearly a dozen senators.

Broadly, these resolutions address ways to curb c*****e c****e and protect the environment. It doesn't lay out any new taxes or revenue streams other than saying that these changes will pay for themselves.

Specifically, what’s in it?
Here are some of the key points in the House resolution.

On emissions:

• "eliminating pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible"

• "building or upgrading to energy-efficient, distributed, and ‘smart’ power grids, and ensuring affordable access to electricity"

• "working collaboratively with farmers and ranchers in the United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector as much as is technologically feasible"

On water:

• "guaranteeing universal access to clean water"

On infrastructure:

• "building resiliency against c*****e c****e-related disasters, such as e*****e w*****r"

• "upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximum energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability, including through electrification"

• "clean, affordable, and accessible public t***sit, and high-speed rail"

On scientific research:

• "making public investments in the research and development of new clean and renewable energy technologies and industries"

Observers who have been tracking the process said that the resolution -- while far-reaching -- is more restrained than some earlier drafts.

For instance, the resolution doesn’t explicitly rule out nuclear power and carbon capture and storage as methods that could be used to reach zero-emissions goals, said Paul Bledsoe, a strategic adviser with the center-left Progressive Policy Institute who previously worked on Capitol Hill and the Clinton administration.

Is the text of the Green New Deal resolution all about the environment?
No. The proposal goes beyond c*****e c****e and the environment to incorporate everything from racial justice to labor union policy.

Here are some of the elements that are included in the resolution.

On the oppressed:

• "to promote justice and equity by stopping current, preventing future, and repairing historic oppression of indigenous peoples, communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth"

On education:

• "providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States"

On labor unions:

• "strengthening and protecting the right of all workers to organize, unionize, and collectively bargain free of coercion, intimidation, and harassment"

On social services:

• "guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States"

• "providing all people of the United States with high-quality health care, affordable, safe, and adequate housing, and economic security"

Some environmentalists have expressed concern that including such elements in the resolution risks watering down its focus.

"There is some consternation that it’s conflating social justice, employment and health care goals into the climate framework," Bledsoe said. "I keep hearing people say, ‘Enacting climate legislation is hard enough without also guaranteeing everyone a job.’ "

I’ve heard something about a ban on farting cows. What’s that about?
We should distinguish the official resolution with some additional documents that were posted and shared by Ocasio-Cortez’s staff around the time the resolution was introduced. Once they became public, portions of these additional documents became grist for ridicule among her critics.

Some critics took aim at a line in one of the FAQs that said "we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes." The same document promised "economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work."

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 17:20:22   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
Curmudgeon

An ill-tempered person full of resentment and stubborn notions.

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 18:02:17   #
son of witless
 
permafrost wrote:
Some of you, about 99% do not seem to understand that this is a resolution.. not any kind of legal bill moving through or proposed to congress or the senate..

It falls in the same file as Newt Gingrich's "contract with america" in 1994..

So I have wondered if anyone is questioning how the actual words in this resolution compare to the information you think is in it as given by your orange blimp and the right wing press..

Out of a choice of dozens of articles, I choose one from Politifact. as good as any.. part is below and i will post the link..

If you should look beyond my posted words, you will see that most of your ridicule was posted by interns. probable college kids doing a funny in their eyes..




https://www.politifact.com/t***h-o-meter/article/2019/feb/12/seven-questions-about-green-new-deal/

What is the "Green New Deal"?
Officially, the Green New Deal is a House resolution that Ocasio-Cortez introduced on Feb. 7, 2019, following months of discussion among progressive lawmakers and activists. There’s also a companion measure in the Senate, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and co-sponsored by nearly a dozen senators.

Broadly, these resolutions address ways to curb c*****e c****e and protect the environment. It doesn't lay out any new taxes or revenue streams other than saying that these changes will pay for themselves.

Specifically, what’s in it?
Here are some of the key points in the House resolution.

On emissions:

• "eliminating pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible"

• "building or upgrading to energy-efficient, distributed, and ‘smart’ power grids, and ensuring affordable access to electricity"

• "working collaboratively with farmers and ranchers in the United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector as much as is technologically feasible"

On water:

• "guaranteeing universal access to clean water"

On infrastructure:

• "building resiliency against c*****e c****e-related disasters, such as e*****e w*****r"

• "upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximum energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability, including through electrification"

• "clean, affordable, and accessible public t***sit, and high-speed rail"

On scientific research:

• "making public investments in the research and development of new clean and renewable energy technologies and industries"

Observers who have been tracking the process said that the resolution -- while far-reaching -- is more restrained than some earlier drafts.

For instance, the resolution doesn’t explicitly rule out nuclear power and carbon capture and storage as methods that could be used to reach zero-emissions goals, said Paul Bledsoe, a strategic adviser with the center-left Progressive Policy Institute who previously worked on Capitol Hill and the Clinton administration.

Is the text of the Green New Deal resolution all about the environment?
No. The proposal goes beyond c*****e c****e and the environment to incorporate everything from racial justice to labor union policy.

Here are some of the elements that are included in the resolution.

On the oppressed:

• "to promote justice and equity by stopping current, preventing future, and repairing historic oppression of indigenous peoples, communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth"

On education:

• "providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States"

On labor unions:

• "strengthening and protecting the right of all workers to organize, unionize, and collectively bargain free of coercion, intimidation, and harassment"

On social services:

• "guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States"

• "providing all people of the United States with high-quality health care, affordable, safe, and adequate housing, and economic security"

Some environmentalists have expressed concern that including such elements in the resolution risks watering down its focus.

"There is some consternation that it’s conflating social justice, employment and health care goals into the climate framework," Bledsoe said. "I keep hearing people say, ‘Enacting climate legislation is hard enough without also guaranteeing everyone a job.’ "

I’ve heard something about a ban on farting cows. What’s that about?
We should distinguish the official resolution with some additional documents that were posted and shared by Ocasio-Cortez’s staff around the time the resolution was introduced. Once they became public, portions of these additional documents became grist for ridicule among her critics.

Some critics took aim at a line in one of the FAQs that said "we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes." The same document promised "economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work."
Some of you, about 99% do not seem to understand t... (show quote)


" Some of you, about 99% do not seem to understand that this is a resolution.. not any kind of legal bill moving through or proposed to congress or the senate.. "

Now that is one hell of a statement to make. Please document how you arrived at that figure ? The people commenting on this topic are pretty politically aware or they would not be here. It is a good thing there is no law against murdering Strawmen.

You must have some kind of a point, so what is it ? That since it is only a resolution and not a proposed Bill, we have nothing to fear from the things it mentioned doing
????

So what does it actually say ? Well that depends, does it not ? On what ? Should we trust Your Version of facts ? Should we trust Alexandria's version ? Well that depends ? On what ? Well there was one version apparently posted on a website.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/the-mysterious-case-of-aocs-scrubbed-green-new-deal-details

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 18:59:00   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Her face fits right on the kommiecrat party jackass. Jackass eyes and teeth, plus, she advocates eating hay.

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2019 19:21:17   #
son of witless
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Her face fits right on the kommiecrat party jackass. Jackass eyes and teeth, plus, she advocates eating hay.


You left out her nose. If she got it fixed she would look so much better.

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 20:14:56   #
Seth
 
Kevyn wrote:
I get a hoot how this pretty energetic go getter gets under the right wing nutters skin!


Yeah, yeah. What's even more of a hoot is the havoc she's soon going to start causing in your party as she begins her move to gain a cult following and status among the farther left members of the House, then begins challenging Pelosi.

The implosion your little cupie doll is going to cause in the Democratic Party will cost them the entire triumvirate: Executive, Legislative and Executive Branches.

-- "I***t!"

Reply
Mar 7, 2019 22:48:39   #
Mikeyavelli
 
son of witless wrote:
You left out her nose. If she got it fixed she would look so much better.


...I could fix that 👊

Reply
Mar 8, 2019 00:35:15   #
EconomistDon
 
Kevyn wrote:
I get a hoot how this pretty energetic go getter gets under the right wing nutters skin!


Who is getting under who's skin? We think that Occasional Cortez is hilarious. She and the two Muslim Democrats are gifts to Republicans. They are so nuts, they make Republicans look good.

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2019 02:10:06   #
dilibar
 
Ooooh! If God would let me, I would H**E the witch!

Reply
Mar 8, 2019 08:43:02   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
son of witless wrote:
" Some of you, about 99% do not seem to understand that this is a resolution.. not any kind of legal bill moving through or proposed to congress or the senate.. "

Now that is one hell of a statement to make. Please document how you arrived at that figure ? The people commenting on this topic are pretty politically aware or they would not be here. It is a good thing there is no law against murdering Strawmen.

You must have some kind of a point, so what is it ? That since it is only a resolution and not a proposed Bill, we have nothing to fear from the things it mentioned doing
????

So what does it actually say ? Well that depends, does it not ? On what ? Should we trust Your Version of facts ? Should we trust Alexandria's version ? Well that depends ? On what ? Well there was one version apparently posted on a website.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/the-mysterious-case-of-aocs-scrubbed-green-new-deal-details
" Some of you, about 99% do not seem to under... (show quote)




You 99% of right winger who clinge to what you wish was true rather then facts as i showed you..

Get a life, think of the mess you have made of our nation, think of the orange trash that you put in our white house.. he is what you get when you give unlimited money to trash..

The New green deal.. only a list of "gosh, we should work to do this"...

It is no law, it is no bill, it is no proposed legislation..

It is a statement that contains a number of good things that we will work for..

It also contains things that are a wish list of things..

You right wingers have added a long list of BS that is not in the statement..

Get a life or get out.. speak the t***h and we can debate the merits of the t***h, make up more of the BS you want everyone to believe and only your butt will hurt..

So, how are you doing this morning? nice day in your part of the world?

Big snow storm coming to our house tomorrow afternoon..



Reply
Mar 8, 2019 10:25:25   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
son of witless wrote:
Did you ever notice those blazing eyes of Rep. Occasio-Cortez ? I keep thinking of the scene from The Outlaw Josie Wales when Clint Eastwood's Character and Lone Waddy his Native American friend are discussing a recent gunfight they just survived. Lone Waddy asks " How did you know which one was going to shoot first ? "

Josie Wales " Well that one in the center, he had a flap holster and he was in no itching hurry. And the second one from the left, he had scared eyes. He wasn't going to do nothing. But that one on the far left, he had crazy eyes. I figured him to make the first move. "

Occasio-Cortez on the Far Left. She has crazy eyes.
Did you ever notice those blazing eyes of Rep. Occ... (show quote)


"Occasio-Cortez on the Far Left. She has crazy eyes."

She has Betty Devious eyes!
AND
Botoxin lips!
AND Camel Toes. LOLOL
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2019/2/15/t1-452193-cortez22.jpg

Reply
Mar 8, 2019 14:05:09   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"Occasio-Cortez on the Far Left. She has crazy eyes."

She has Betty Devious eyes!
AND
Botoxin lips!
AND Camel Toes. LOLOL
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2019/2/15/t1-452193-cortez22.jpg




Gee, eagle,,, I truly h**e to say this, but "Betty Devious eyes" is a darn good line!!!

All in all, isn`t it great to find a new American leader as young and attractive as AOC....



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.