I heard DC Libertarians were planning secession that's what would be your best bet, if the Libertarians get a leg up I mean, however they won't do anything while the system is solid behind them.
Maybe they will join up with California for a Civil War with the Union in reverse as breakaway wealthy folks having safe States to use itinerant workers from left over States as Feudal Domestics.
Otherwise the narrative won't go in your direction, it's all about US isolationism and social welfare for the plebeians or the blue bloods.
I think personality politics really only pushes for indipendent thinking as psychology nothing to do with political movements.
Libertarians as mostly penny millionaire property owners and they know not to rock the boat, some genuine thinkers like Ron Paul make excuses for them with mercantile economics but that won't go far.
The choice is between State Socialism where the State controls the Oligarchs or Oligarch Socialism where the monopoly CIO's (chief information officers') control the State.
Trump is going to lose if you're tied to him you will not surface as a new wave State power changing the Constitution with positive Cultural Prescriptions.
I can show you what John Dewey believed the answer entailed but it's not easy to follow it comes from a University paper, as Part One - Dewey's General Philosophical Perspective - Dewey and Pierce I'm not sure exactly which library book I got it from, I just kept a copy of Dewey's idea of the Correct approach. Page 29 Chapter 2 Human Nature sub-title Darwinian Roots.
Quote,- Dewey's impact compels philosophy to abandon efforts to prove that "life must have certain qualities and values, no matter how experience presents the matter because of some remote cause and eventual goal".
In place of this quest for say, the correct understanding of sexuality in life as the proper relationship between the sexes, philosophy would now foster "our looking the facts of experience in the face", (MW4:12) .
Third Dewey writes as a consequence, logic introduces responsibility into the intellectual life. *"Concern for the Universe at large betrays an inability to control specific problums that are near to us".
On the one hand he continues, if insight into specific conditions of value and into specific conditions of ideas is possible philosophy must in time become a method of locating and interpreting the more serious of the conflicts that occur in life, and a method of projection and dealing with them a method of diagnosis and prognosis". (MW4:13).
Here Dewey rejects the fundamental questions of, cause and purpose for cause, in favour of practical pragmatic offerrings as solutions to immediate problums.
This is what personality politics is all about not getting ahead of yourself and becoming detached from the existential reality this is exactly what Trump is guilty of, before 2016 he was being pushed by a "grassroots popularity approach" World driven, now he's attempting to exploit that grassroots sentiment for, as Dewey puts it in second paragraph of my quotation.
*" Concern for the Universe at large betrays an inability to control specific problums that are near to us".
Ask yourself what the hell would Trump know about the Universe at large?.
See I'm losing the battle against composure,
I heard DC Libertarians were planning secession t... (