Dear Non-Natives: Good point...

PeterS

Good point...

Common_Sense_Matters

PeterS wrote:

Good point...

Good luck with this one, don't open any gifts from any of the "true patriots" on this site, let the bomb squad open your "gifts".

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

PeterS wrote:

Good point...

Early settlers were colonizers... Many were seeking a better life... There was no i*****l i*********n... As there were no recognized nations...There was resistance from the Natives... They lost... A new country was born..

Legal immigrants have every right to be in the country.. They followed the rules...

I*****l i*******ts have no right to entry... If they are colonizers then they should be resisted... If they win then they may raise a new nation and resist invasion in turn...

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Early settlers were colonizers... Many were seeking a better life... There was no i*****l i*********n... As there were no recognized nations...There was resistance from the Natives... They lost... A new country was born..

Legal immigrants have every right to be in the country.. They followed the rules...

I*****l i*******ts have no right to entry... If they are colonizers then they should be resisted... If they win then they may raise a new nation and resist invasion in turn...

To the point-- I do have to say though that legal asylum seekers are not criminals but are being treated that way. There are so many aguements justifying this policy yet the problem goes unsolved. What are we going to do about the thousands of separated immigrant children that the Trump administration says are now impossible to be reunited with their parents? Trump says it would be "Too Traumatic" also what is the realistic thing to do about Latins who came here as small children and are American in every way except by birth certificate?

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

To the point-- I do have to say though that legal ... (show quote)

Hi Tom .. Hope you are well today...

The meme did not address asylum seekers, so neither did I...

They are yet another category and should not be lumped in with i*****l i*******ts...
The children separated are not immigrants, but asylum seekers.. It was handled poorly... I agree that changes need to be made to the system... But I also agree with separating children from individuals who can't prove parenthood...

In my opinion the Dreamers deserve a pathway to citizenship.. But their parents are still guilty of breaking the law and should not benefit from this... I believe that several offers have been made and rejected from both sides of the aisle.. .

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Hi Tom .. Hope you are well today... br br The me... (show quote)

There will someday be a realistic solution implimented on the immigration problem. Ou current system is plagued with pre concieved notions and bickering factions and the lives of Human beings are meaninless to the effect that there is no solution. The problem will not go away on its own. We have work to do and it is time to get real. Our system is broken and on that much we can agree. How are we going to fix it? Are we Americans who believe in justice and freedom for all people or are we trying to destroy that belief ?

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

There will someday be a realistic solution implime... (show quote)

It is to be hoped that the system can be fixed...
I have always been under the impression that America believes in justice and freedom for Americans only...
Just my perception...

Rose42

This is silly. It is someone's opinion and an ignorant one at best. They didn't come with the intent to k**l people.

People should read history rather than trying to make up their own.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Good luck with this one, don't open any gifts from any of the "true patriots" on this site, let the bomb squad open your "gifts".

Gatsby

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Early settlers were colonizers... Many were seeking a better life... There was no i*****l i*********n... As there were no recognized nations...There was resistance from the Natives... They lost... A new country was born..

Legal immigrants have every right to be in the country.. They followed the rules...

I*****l i*******ts have no right to entry... If they are colonizers then they should be resisted... If they win then they may raise a new nation and resist invasion in turn...

Early settlers were indeed colonizers, and the earliest came across the land bridge,

between Siberia and Alaska, a mere 15,000 years ago.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

It is to be hoped that the system can be fixed...
I have always been under the impression that America believes in justice and freedom for Americans only...
Just my perception...

Not all Americans believe that way but your observation is quite true

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Gatsby wrote:

Early settlers were indeed colonizers, and the earliest came across the land bridge,

between Siberia and Alaska, a mere 15,000 years ago.

I would like it explained to me -How then do 35,000 yea old human remains exist in the southern tip of South America?

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

PeterS wrote:

Good point...

I guess muslims should be called "colonizers"!

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

I would like it explained to me -How then do 35,000 yea old human remains exist in the southern tip of South America?

There have been numerous migrations... And not all came via the land bridge....

I was just having this discussion with two of my students...

TrueAmerican

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

To the point-- I do have to say though that legal ... (show quote)

If they enter without permission they are I*****L A***N INVADERS --- NOT immigrants !!!!!!