One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Jim Bakker threatens Civil War if Trump impeached.
Page <<first <prev 13 of 13
Mar 2, 2019 11:06:15   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
sbv0130 wrote:
Click "Edit."


Subversive, also if you wait too long, you can't edit.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 11:53:08   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
PeterS wrote:
So am I surprised? Not in the least--after all, I read conservative posts on OPP each and every day...

It does make one wonder just WTF is wrong with conservatives. I mean do they think we won't impeach Trump simply because they are a bunch of bullies? Won't even make us skip a beat...


Why anyone gives a second thought to anything Jim Bakker says is beyond me!

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 12:46:30   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Why anyone gives a second thought to anything Jim Bakker says is beyond me!


Televangelists should be in politics. Anyone who can bulls**t an audience for a half hour without an iota of shame could run for office.

Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2019 16:25:59   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Televangelists should be in politics. Anyone who can bulls**t an audience for a half hour without an iota of shame could run for office.


And of course televangelists share another important trait with politicians: the highly developed ability to separate people from their money while convincing them that they are the ones benefitting by handing over their cash.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 16:30:01   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
PaulPisces wrote:
And of course televangelists share another important trait with politicians: the highly developed ability to separate people from their money while convincing them that they are the ones benefitting by handing over their cash.


Nail. Head. SMACK! Televangelists have the added advantage of selling the ultimate life insurance.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 19:36:01   #
sbv0130
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Televangelists should be in politics. Anyone who can bulls**t an audience for a half hour without an iota of shame could run for office.


Look who's in the WH.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 20:37:39   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
sbv0130 wrote:
Look who's in the WH.


The first president in how many years who is not a professional politician.

Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2019 22:56:11   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
The first president in how many years who is not a professional politician.



How refreshing!!!???

He just learned to c***t and lie in real estate.

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 00:38:56   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
PaulPisces wrote:
How refreshing!!!???

He just learned to c***t and lie in real estate.


As opposed to doing it on the taxpayers' dime. How much of your money has Nancy Pelosi wasted? How about Leland Yee?

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 12:25:56   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
As opposed to doing it on the taxpayers' dime. How much of your money has Nancy Pelosi wasted? How about Leland Yee?


That is a distraction Mr. S.
In any case, tax abatements finagled by Trump effectively pick the pockets of taxpayers. Especially so when his businesses fail, effectively erasing any benefit to the communities that proffered the tax give-aways to begin with.

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 16:10:46   #
Mikeyavelli
 
PaulPisces wrote:
That is a distraction Mr. S.
In any case, tax abatements finagled by Trump effectively pick the pockets of taxpayers. Especially so when his businesses fail, effectively erasing any benefit to the communities that proffered the tax give-aways to begin with.


Trump succeeded in saving America.
Billionaire winning the presidency and you consider that a failure?

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2019 16:42:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
PaulPisces wrote:
That is a distraction Mr. S.
In any case, tax abatements finagled by Trump effectively pick the pockets of taxpayers. Especially so when his businesses fail, effectively erasing any benefit to the communities that proffered the tax give-aways to begin with.

I suppose you can explain how a tax cut that puts money in my pocket picks said pocket; and how having extra money in my pocket and those of my customers, giving them more discretionary funds, would cause a business to fail.

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 17:19:13   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
PaulPisces wrote:
That is a distraction Mr. S.
In any case, tax abatements finagled by Trump effectively pick the pockets of taxpayers. Especially so when his businesses fail, effectively erasing any benefit to the communities that proffered the tax give-aways to begin with.



Paul, if you have a problem with tax abatements or picking the pockets of the taxpayers, may I suggest you take it up with Congress. They are the ones responsible and it goes back many years. If you would go back 30 Congresses or to about 1960, you will find that, on the average, Democrats had the majority on approximately a 3 to 2 ratio. Now you may disagree, but my conclusion is that if past tax laws favor the so-called rich Republicans, it is only because the Democrats want it that way. After all, the elite or rich are now more heavily represented by Democrats than Republicans. It alway amazes me how the ones blessed with the heaviest wallets are the ones who scream the loudest about taxing the rich, such as Nancy P and Chucky. One of the big Dem billionaires, I can't remember who, said that he wasn't taxed enough yet I haven't heard that he offered to pay more taxes, and I'm sure we would have heard from the media if he had done so. One thing you might bear in mind and that is that Democrats talk really big about what they are going to do for the people - during the campaign - and then they go back to doing exactly what they did before. Class envy is an easy sell to the rank and file.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 13
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.