Anderson Cooper owes Ocrazio Cortez over $85 million
Feb 22, 2019 13:33:56 #
Anderson Cooper's net worth is 110 million dollars largely derived from a career in journalism and that sweet Vanderbilt money from moms.
The tippy top, according to Ocrazio Cortez , has a system that wants 85% tax on this income. See Anderson Cooper's face on the 60 minutes interview when she says this.
That means he should write her a check for more than 85 million dollars on his earnings to date.
The funny thing is she acts like she has no idea who she's talking to.
Notice how he keeps a straight face
He prolly called his people in Switzerland to change his banking password the minute she was out the door.
The tippy top, according to Ocrazio Cortez , has a system that wants 85% tax on this income. See Anderson Cooper's face on the 60 minutes interview when she says this.
That means he should write her a check for more than 85 million dollars on his earnings to date.
The funny thing is she acts like she has no idea who she's talking to.
Notice how he keeps a straight face
He prolly called his people in Switzerland to change his banking password the minute she was out the door.
Feb 22, 2019 15:18:04 #
tommsteyer wrote:
Anderson Cooper's net worth is 110 million dollars... (show quote)
He amassed this over a period of years meaning even with such immense wealth he wouldn’t be subject to the 70% tax rate she proposed. Where did you come up with the 85K figure, just pull it out of your arse like most right wingers?
Feb 22, 2019 15:31:01 #
Kevyn wrote:
He amassed this over a period of years meaning even with such immense wealth he wouldn’t be subject to the 70% tax rate she proposed. Where did you come up with the 85K figure, just pull it out of your arse like most right wingers?
Most likely, if you checked Anderson Cooper’s “arse”....you’d find Don Lemon’s DNA.
Feb 23, 2019 13:57:28 #
steve66613 wrote:
Most likely, if you checked Anderson Cooper’s “arse”....you’d find Don Lemon’s DNA.
Feb 23, 2019 15:53:00 #
tommsteyer wrote:
Anderson Cooper's net worth is 110 million dollars... (show quote)
His net worth is not his earnings, and there will be no retroactive things such as you ignorantly describe.
This is a tough concept considering how much truly i***tic rhetoric that has nothing to do with reality gets thrown around by the right. Earnings is not assets and worth.
Feb 24, 2019 02:18:12 #
Feb 24, 2019 04:57:50 #
redpill
Loc: Oregon - not PDX
AOC might be on to something. Even though I h**e her, even a blind squirrel will find a nut occasionally.
Wondering if I understand her high INCOME tax. It is focused on EARNINGS not NET WORTH. So, I being a billionaire would not be taxed on my net worth of 300 billion dollars. I would only be taxed on the 300 million (ignoring the 10 million) that I "earned" this year. That tax at 85% would be 255 million. I would be able to keep 45 million to increase my net worth. Seams almost reasonable.
This is my socialism acceptance showing through. I find that "incomes" of the amounts above as being obscene. Oh, I get the idea of "hard work", compensation for inventiveness, and other benefits from honest capitalism. Say .... I start my sandwich cart, work every day and save, and upgrade to a brick and stone restaurant, and expand to a chain, and poof, I'm the new McDonalds. I worked my ass off to get here. Now what? I've built my dream into a billion dollar empire. Now what? I do nothing but sit in board meetings and collect a billion dollars a year, while my employees make minimal wages. Is there not a point in this process where I no longer need a billion dollar salary but could compensate those that s***e for me at a higher rate?
Plain and simple, AOC is an i***t. She (and I) would benefit from a learned economics professional. The scenario must have flaws. Perhaps I should not have slept through Econ 101.
Wondering if I understand her high INCOME tax. It is focused on EARNINGS not NET WORTH. So, I being a billionaire would not be taxed on my net worth of 300 billion dollars. I would only be taxed on the 300 million (ignoring the 10 million) that I "earned" this year. That tax at 85% would be 255 million. I would be able to keep 45 million to increase my net worth. Seams almost reasonable.
This is my socialism acceptance showing through. I find that "incomes" of the amounts above as being obscene. Oh, I get the idea of "hard work", compensation for inventiveness, and other benefits from honest capitalism. Say .... I start my sandwich cart, work every day and save, and upgrade to a brick and stone restaurant, and expand to a chain, and poof, I'm the new McDonalds. I worked my ass off to get here. Now what? I've built my dream into a billion dollar empire. Now what? I do nothing but sit in board meetings and collect a billion dollars a year, while my employees make minimal wages. Is there not a point in this process where I no longer need a billion dollar salary but could compensate those that s***e for me at a higher rate?
Plain and simple, AOC is an i***t. She (and I) would benefit from a learned economics professional. The scenario must have flaws. Perhaps I should not have slept through Econ 101.
Mar 1, 2019 13:53:10 #
Is there an economics professor from her past who like to step forward and take credit for this ?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.