One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Guess who supports Bernie Sanders for President???...Venezuelan Dictator Maduro...
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 23, 2019 09:06:05   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
proud republican wrote:
I guess its not Trump who has affection for Dictators...Dictator who starves and k**ls his own people...Good going Bernie!!!



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/01/nicolas-maduro-of-venezuela-backs-bernie-sanders-for-us-presiden/
I guess its not Trump who has affection for Dictat... (show quote)


This is a defining watershed issue provoking many versions of the future, some say it's not about Nations any more it's operations by groups within Nations, London's Financial Centre going for a US take down, Rothschild wanting real collateral for the Fed, a drug traffic road avoiding Trump's wall Venezuela Haiti Dominican Republic NewYork, Jesuits behind Trump opposing Chinese Russian G*******ts and the Vatican opposing Guaido to keep Divinity on the straight and narrow (each way bet) or perhaps the Fracking Industry wanting higher prices by spiking a P**********l War.

I think it's none of the above.

Hillary lost on purpose so GOP can go for broke, and how could they not with Trump doing the driving?.

But it could work, and extend US hegemony the unipolar moment brough on by the Jesuit dismantlement of the Soviet Union.

The C****es are still waiting for Pope John Paul to buddy them up with everybody there's one born every minute others learn from his mistakes maybe.

So if I'm right the Russians Asians Chinese Iranians Indians and Africans will sit quietly pointing at each other discussing who should be next.

As their economies go into decline, like ours, this is Trump attempting to create a New World Order, NATO is bad the WTO is bad, EU bad, Merkel is bad, IMF and WB bad, all Arms Treaties bab, JCPOA bad, Socialism bad, G*******ts bad, Israel good only because of end times end of GOP if he can't pull it off.




Reply
Feb 23, 2019 19:22:42   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
RT friend wrote:
This is a defining watershed issue provoking many versions of the future, some say it's not about Nations any more it's operations by groups within Nations, London's Financial Centre going for a US take down, Rothschild wanting real collateral for the Fed, a drug traffic road avoiding Trump's wall Venezuela Haiti Dominican Republic NewYork, Jesuits behind Trump opposing Chinese Russian G*******ts and the Vatican opposing Guaido to keep Divinity on the straight and narrow (each way bet) or perhaps the Fracking Industry wanting higher prices by spiking a P**********l War.

I think it's none of the above.

Hillary lost on purpose so GOP can go for broke, and how could they not with Trump doing the driving?.

But it could work, and extend US hegemony the unipolar moment brough on by the Jesuit dismantlement of the Soviet Union.

The C****es are still waiting for Pope John Paul to buddy them up with everybody there's one born every minute others learn from his mistakes maybe.

So if I'm right the Russians Asians Chinese Iranians Indians and Africans will sit quietly pointing at each other discussing who should be next.

As their economies go into decline, like ours, this is Trump attempting to create a New World Order, NATO is bad the WTO is bad, EU bad, Merkel is bad, IMF and WB bad, all Arms Treaties bab, JCPOA bad, Socialism bad, G*******ts bad, Israel good only because of end times end of GOP if he can't pull it off.

This is a defining watershed issue provoking many ... (show quote)


I assume Hillary Clinton will be nominated for an academy award for her f**e crying for months and months over loosing in 2016.

Reply
Feb 23, 2019 20:44:36   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
old marine wrote:
I assume Hillary Clinton will be nominated for an academy award for her f**e crying for months and months over loosing in 2016.

Yep, I know what I believe is hard for others to come to terms with, Hillary lost on purpose but I been saying that on the internet for 26 months.

Hillary is a great actor no doubt about it.

What made me believe Hillary was using reverse psychology by accepting short term loss for a possible long term gain for the Democratic Party not really for her personal ambitions was the very fact that I had just witnessed Obama doing the exact same thing.

I had always said since July 2014 that God was supporting Brother Baghdadi's Islamic State to advance Assad's Government.

When I came on OPP I was advocating Sharia Law as a Salafist, ask Lindajoy, true I posted as a Stalinist from time to time as well which seems contradictory but it helps to put 2 and 2 together when chasing romance, but that's another story all together.


My point is, it turned out to be true IS split al-Qaeda (al- Nusra Front) Assad won which would have been impossible otherwise, so Ahur Mazda sacrificed the ones He loved the best so Russia could sell gas to Germany and Australia sell coal to China.

Obama kept saying it would take 30 years to beat IS, he figured al-Zawahi's al-Qaeda would naturally team up with the US Secretary of State like in Afghanistan and as the Brotherhood did in Libya and Egypt, al-Qaeda did but IS didn't, so I got it right.

That was my initial claim to internet guru fame, I went on to predict virtually everything that came about since then, especially about the Dems throwing the 2016 e******n so Trump could take on extreamly adventurous policies.

It's all recorded on the internet and my prophecies have all come true so far, Trump is going for broke.

Hillary is a good actor and I wouldn't have cottoned on to her except I was basing my syllogism (deductive reasoning applied logically) always with the major premise as "crazyness usually comes from only two places extreme exuberance and extreme sadness and Hillary had em both in abundance".

It's not rocket science.

Thanks for the reply.





Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2019 19:29:10   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
RT friend wrote:
Yep, I know what I believe is hard for others to come to terms with, Hillary lost on purpose but I been saying that on the internet for 26 months.

Hillary is a great actor no doubt about it.

What made me believe Hillary was using reverse psychology by accepting short term loss for a possible long term gain for the Democratic Party not really for her personal ambitions was the very fact that I had just witnessed Obama doing the exact same thing.

I had always said since July 2014 that God was supporting Brother Baghdadi's Islamic State to advance Assad's Government.

When I came on OPP I was advocating Sharia Law as a Salafist, ask Lindajoy, true I posted as a Stalinist from time to time as well which seems contradictory but it helps to put 2 and 2 together when chasing romance, but that's another story all together.


My point is, it turned out to be true IS split al-Qaeda (al- Nusra Front) Assad won which would have been impossible otherwise, so Ahur Mazda sacrificed the ones He loved the best so Russia could sell gas to Germany and Australia sell coal to China.

Obama kept saying it would take 30 years to beat IS, he figured al-Zawahi's al-Qaeda would naturally team up with the US Secretary of State like in Afghanistan and as the Brotherhood did in Libya and Egypt, al-Qaeda did but IS didn't, so I got it right.

That was my initial claim to internet guru fame, I went on to predict virtually everything that came about since then, especially about the Dems throwing the 2016 e******n so Trump could take on extreamly adventurous policies.

It's all recorded on the internet and my prophecies have all come true so far, Trump is going for broke.

Hillary is a good actor and I wouldn't have cottoned on to her except I was basing my syllogism (deductive reasoning applied logically) always with the major premise as "crazyness usually comes from only two places extreme exuberance and extreme sadness and Hillary had em both in abundance".

It's not rocket science.

Thanks for the reply.

Yep, I know what I believe is hard for others to... (show quote)


I seriously doubt Hillary Clinton is even a fair actor. Yet I doubt anyone can top her lying. Well maybe Obama could.

Reply
Feb 25, 2019 02:11:30   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
old marine wrote:
I seriously doubt Hillary Clinton is even a fair actor. Yet I doubt anyone can top her lying. Well maybe Obama could.


Lighten up, don't be so critical things happen and genius is neglected.

Take my situation for example, I was probably the best bath room performer that ever there was but when I stopped having baths 13 years ago because of sensitive skin the world didn't vanish when my itching went away but a lot of good things disappeared from the entertainment industry.

13 years ago George W Bush was ushering in Barack H Obama much the same as Trumps doing now.

I could be bribed into beginning to clean myself up in bath tub again, and the result won't be another catastrophe for American.

Check out my son's YouTube Channel he's crazy mad for views and I'll see what can be arranged. That's - Aus Pinay Channel - he's got the Australian and Philippines f**gs as emblums. Aus Pinay




Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.