One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Myth of Three Co-Equal Branches of Government
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 26, 2019 09:04:30   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
bahmer wrote:
Nope I just posted the article for discussion is all.


Understood. Still, some of the responses indicate that Congress seems like a l*****t plot to undermine the President, rather than a discussion of the relations between the branches of government, much less a debate about the 'primacy' of Congress.

Reply
Feb 26, 2019 10:52:40   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
May as well add the President to that list, eh? With his emergency that he didn't need declare, perhaps he could use a refresher course on the primacy of Congress.


It's not as though Trump was saying "there is no emergency." It was him saying that had it not been for opposition to border security from those who once promoted it and a wall, then there would have been no need for this course of action. Your attempt to deny the actual meaning of what he said is as disingenuous as those who have even v**ed for a barrier and called it an emergency and a crisis to now pretend they didn't.

Does being anti-Trump make one automatically want what is worse for America as long s it goes against Tump? Are you one of those who want N Korea to continue to be a threat just so Trump will have failed? Are you one who would actually enjoy hearing about a nuke from N Korea hitting us? Will your anti-Trumpism lead us to certain failure in a socialist regime? Will you support the l*****ts agenda's of identity politics even to the point of paying black people for the sins of those long dead??

Just how far will your anti-Trumpism take you??

Reply
Feb 26, 2019 11:11:09   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It's not as though Trump was saying "there is no emergency." It was him saying that had it not been for opposition to border security from those who once promoted it and a wall, then there would have been no need for this course of action. Your attempt to deny the actual meaning of what he said is as disingenuous as those who have even v**ed for a barrier and called it an emergency and a crisis to now pretend they didn't.

Does being anti-Trump make one automatically want what is worse for America as long s it goes against Tump? Are you one of those who want N Korea to continue to be a threat just so Trump will have failed? Are you one who would actually enjoy hearing about a nuke from N Korea hitting us? Will your anti-Trumpism lead us to certain failure in a socialist regime? Will you support the l*****ts agenda's of identity politics even to the point of paying black people for the sins of those long dead??

Just how far will your anti-Trumpism take you??
It's not as though Trump was saying "there is... (show quote)


You have the wrong guy. My slogan for 2020 is let Trump be Trump. And besides....this discussion is supposed to be about the relations between the branches of government. A good topic, if we can stay on it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2019 11:16:08   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
You have the wrong guy. My slogan for 2020 is let Trump be Trump. And besides....this discussion is supposed to be about the relations between the branches of government. A good topic, if we can stay on it.


I guess you fooled both me and Carol. LOL! It was you who brought up the "emergency" which naturally leads down the road to those who h**e Trump. But hey, if you are not one of those, then so be it. What ever did yo mean by your "off topic" comment??

Reply
Feb 26, 2019 11:21:05   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
You have the wrong guy. My slogan for 2020 is let Trump be Trump. And besides....this discussion is supposed to be about the relations between the branches of government. A good topic, if we can stay on it.


As for the topic, I'd say the left, lead by Pelosi have missed the entire point of the three branches of gov. I think Trump understands it perfectly well, however. He has every right to declare this emergency with prior presidents referring to it as a crisis and all the previous bloviating by so many about the need to secure the border.

In addition, one couls also add l*****t judges to the list of those who fail to understand. They insist on legislating from the bench rather than simply ruling on the constitutional nature of actions.

Reply
Feb 26, 2019 11:31:33   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
[quote=bahmer]The Myth of Three Co-Equal Branches of Government [VIDEO]
By Jake MacAulay - February 21, 2019

In today’s delicate, thin-skinned and ultra-sensitive world where the gospel of “e******y of outcomes” is paramount, it should come as no surprise that most Americans favor the unconstitutional myth of three co-equal branches of government.

Well, unfortunately for America”

“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”
Last month at an MSNBC Town Hall, Nancy Pelosi, a self-proclaimed Constitutional Scholar and current Speaker of the House of Representatives, stated:

Trending: Democrats are God’s Judgement On America
“Our Founders envisioned three co-equal branches of government. There’s little excuse for one chamber of Congress refusing to do its job and simply giving power over to the President.”

My good friend and Institute on the Constitution Chapter Leader, Gary Porter, made the following observation in his recent presentation on the topic:

“Speaker Pelosi is not alone in her confusion as to our government’s design, the ‘Three Co-Equal Branches’ myth has been drummed into millions upon millions of public school children’s heads for probably the last one-hundred years. A simple Google search finds people ranging from reporters, to sitting Congressmen, to lawyer’s groups and, of course, educational websites repeating this patent unt***h.”
So just what is it that these zealously uninformed crusaders of e******y “know for certain that just ain’t so”?

First of all, we need to consult the architects of our Republic – the Founding Fathers – to see how closely this belief conforms to the Framers’ design.

James Madison, known as the father of the Constitution, stated in Federalist Paper 51:L

“In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates. The remedy for this inconveniency is to divide the legislature into different branches.”

By consulting with Madison, we discover that in actuality, Congress’ authority predominates, which is why we have divided the power into two branches.

By simple mathematics we see this reality to be true.

If we place the number of authorities of each Branch found in the Constitution, we see the scale disproportionate with the Legislative Branch having roughly forty-eight powers, followed by the Executive Branch with roughly twelve powers, and in last place the Judicial Branch with roughly three powers.

This, of course, correlates with the number of Federalist Papers written by our Founders. These Papers explained the functioning jobs of each of our three Constitutional branches of government. There are fifteen Papers for Congress, nine for the President, and six for the Courts.


To add further credibility to the discriminate powers of Congress, we find they have power to impeach ANY member of the other two branches!

For the Speaker of the House to be unaware of the proper balance of power is very problematic. Perhaps she ought to read Madison and get more acquainted with the document she swore before Almighty God to uphold and defend.

Better yet, the American people ought to read Madison, learn the Constitution for themselves, and avoid ignorance in office.

https://youtu.be/vQZO5qzOvKw

Schedule an event or learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and the Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Barb Wire.[/quote]

Thank you for the thoughtful post.
I would like to add that too often issue seem to be dealt with as winning or losing.
Too much political party issues seem to dominate issues.

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 20:31:36   #
vernon
 
working class stiff wrote:
May as well add the President to that list, eh? With his emergency that he didn't need declare, perhaps he could use a refresher course on the primacy of Congress.


Congress gave the president those powers. But with these radicals in power you see them trying to control his every move.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.