Sicilianthing

These officials in collusion who actually think it’s unconstitutional will be Marked as T*****rs



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



California and 15 other states sue over Trump's national emergency

California and 15 other states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging Donald Trump's national emergency declaration.

“The president admitted that there’s not a basis for the declaration. He admitted there’s no crisis at the border. He’s now trying to rob funds that were allocated by Congress legally to the various states and people of our states,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra told Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC Monday afternoon before the suit was filed.

“The separation of powers is being violated, we’re going to go out there and make sure that Donald Trump cannot steal money from the states and people who need them, since we paid the taxpayer dollars to Washington, D.C., to get those services,” he said.

Trump said on Friday that he would bypass Congress by declaring a national emergency to build a border wall along the nation’s southern border, after a protracted battle in which Congress has repeatedly declined to give the president billions to build border barriers.

A national emergency declaration gives the president special powers to take taxpayer dollars from other budgets to pay for border wall construction, but legal challenges to such an effort are inevitable. Before the emergency was declared, Becerra vowed "to reject this foolish proposal in court the moment it touches the ground."

"The president does have broad authority. But he does not have authority to violate the Constitution," Becerra said. "President Obama never did this. He never tried to raid accounts, funding accounts, that had been allocated by Congress. When a president tries to do that, the Supreme Court will typically step in and say, 'Keep your hands out of the cookie jar.'"

Becerra has sued the president dozens of times already, and the president signaled that he expected this lawsuit during his Friday remarks.

“And I'll sign the final papers as soon as I get into the Oval Office. And we will have a national emergency, and then we will then be sued, and they will sue us in the 9th Circuit, even though it shouldn't be there,”

Trump said, speaking of the largest circuit court, which includes California. “And we will possibly get a bad ruling, and then we'll get another bad ruling. And then we'll end up in the Supreme Court, and hopefully we'll get a fair shake. And we'll win in the Supreme Court, just like the ban.”

"The only national emergency is the president's trafficking in lies and deceit," Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said in a statement

BBianch

T*****rous behavior might be viewed as someone who takes the word of an enemy over that of our own intellengence agencies ...

Sicilianthing

>>>

Huh ? What are you referring to ?
This is about it his order is Unconstitutional or not...

BBianch

Isn't that a matter that the courts will ultimately decide?

Sicilianthing

>>>

Well yeah, it’s at the 9th circuit today already and they will begin their stupidly tomorrow.

Then it will go to the appellate and they will either agree with Trump which they should or it will go to SCOTUS where Trump will Win Flat OUT

100% Guaranteed...

I can’t get Vegas to take my Bets...

I’ll take any Wager who says this won’t pass.... !

BBianch

Well, we'll find out soon enough .. but didn't the Surpreme Court v**e against Obama regarding the DACA kids, ... indicating that the matter should be determined by Congress, and doesn't the Constitution state that Congress is responsible for appropriating funding?

Sicilianthing

>>>

Sure except for when the President declares a national emergency because of security, invasion, safety, obstruction by officials etc...

You can learn here:

STATEMENTS & RELEASES

Statement by the President
On IMMIGRATION
Issued on: February 15, 2019

SHARE:

Today, I have signed into law H.J. Res. 31, the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019” (the “Act”), which authorizes appropriations to fund the operation of a number of agencies in the Federal Government through September 30, 2019.

Certain provisions of the Act (such as Division F, under the heading “Contribution for International Peacekeeping Activities”) would require advance notice to the Congress before the President may direct certain military actions or provide certain forms of military assistance. In signing the Act, I reiterate the well-established understanding of the executive branch that these types of provisions encompass only military actions for which providing advance notice is feasible and consistent with the President’s constitutional authority and duty as Commander in Chief to ensure national security. In addition, Division C, section 527, and Division A, section 516, both restrict the t***sfer of Guantanamo detainees to the United States. I will treat these, and similar provisions, consistent with the President’s constitutional authority as Commander in Chief.

Numerous provisions could, in certain circumstances, interfere with the exercise of the President’s constitutional authorities to negotiate international agreements (such as Division C, sections 509, 518, and 530; and Division F, sections 7010(c) and 7013(a)), to articulate the position of the United States in international fora (such as Division F, sections 7025(c), 7029(a), (b)(1), 7031(d)(2), 7042(h)(1), 7043(g)(1), 7047(b)(3), 7054(b), and 7060(c)(2)(D), (3)), to receive ambassadors (such as Division F, section 7031(c)), and to recognize foreign governments (such as Division F, section 7047(b)(2)(A)). My Administration will treat each of these provisions consistent with the President’s constitutional authorities with respect to foreign relations.

Division C, section 537, provides that the Department of Justice may not use any funds to prevent implementation of medical marijuana laws by various States and territories. I will treat this provision consistent with the President’s constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.

Certain provisions within Division D, title II, under the heading “Office of Management and Budget — Salaries and Expenses” impose restrictions on supervision by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of work performed by executive departments and agencies, including provisos that no funds made available to OMB “may be expended for the altering of the annual work plan developed by the Corps of Engineers for submission to the Committees on Appropriations”; that “none of the funds provided in this or prior Acts shall be used, directly or indirectly, by the Office of Management and Budget, for evaluating or determining if water resource project or study reports submitted by the Chief of Engineers acting through the Secretary of the Army are in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and requirements relevant to the Civil Works water resource planning process”; and that “none of the funds appropriated in this Act for the Office of Management and Budget may be used for the purpose of reviewing any agricultural marketing orders or any activities or regulations under the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).” The President has well-established authority to supervise and oversee the executive branch and to rely on subordinates, including aides within the Executive Office of the President, to assist in supervising the executive branch. Legislation that significantly impedes the President’s ability to supervise the executive branch or obtain the assistance of aides in this function violates the separation of powers by undermining the President’s ability to fulfill his constitutional responsibilities, including the responsibility to faithfully execute the laws of the United States. My Administration will, therefore, construe these restrictions in Division C, title II consistent with these P**********l duties.

Several provisions (such as Division F, section 7041(b)(3)) mandate or regulate the submission of certain executive branch information to the Congress. I will treat these provisions in a manner consistent with the President’s constitutional authority to withhold information that could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the executive branch, or the performance of the President’s constitutional duties. In particular, Division D, section 713, prohibits the use of appropriations to pay the salary of any Federal officer or employee who interferes with or prohibits certain official communications between Federal employees and Members of Congress or of any Federal officer or employee who takes adverse action against an officer or employee because of such communications. I will construe these provisions not to apply to circumstances that would detract from my authority to supervise, control, and correct communications by Federal officers and employees with the Congress related to their official duties, including in cases where such communications would be unlawful or could reveal confidential information protected by executive privilege.

Certain provisions (such as Division F, section 7064; and Division G, section 418) prohibit the use of funds to deny an Inspector General access to agency records or documents. I will construe these, and similar provisions, consistent with my authority to control the dissemination of information protected by executive privilege.

Certain provisions prohibit the use of funds to recommend certain legislation to the Congress (Division B, section 715), or require recommendations of certain legislation to the Congress (Division A, section 537). Because the Constitution gives the President the authority to recommend “such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient”, my Administration will continue the practice of treating provisions like these as advisory and non-binding.

Numerous provisions purport, in certain circumstances, to condition the authority of officers to spend or reallocate funds on the approval of congressional committees (Division B, sections 702, 706, and 716(a), (b); Division E, sections 403 and 409; Division G, sections 188, 405, and 406). These are impermissible forms of congressional aggrandizement in the execution of the laws other than by the enactment of statutes. My Administration will make appropriate efforts to notify the relevant committees before taking the specified actions and will accord the recommendations of such committees all appropriate and serious consideration, but it will not treat spending decisions as dependent on the approval of congressional committees.

BBianch

And he will have to prove in court, the reasons why he believes there is a national emergency, and his opponents will try to prove otherwise .. should be interesting!

Sicilianthing

>>>

Scroll up I just gave you the whole legal proof he has.

BBianch

I don't think you did .. what you gave me was his case for declaring an emergency .. he has to prove that case in court .. and others will challenge his statements ..

Sicilianthing

>>>

If you read it you will see the sections of the Law/s as it has already been written long ago.

What part dont you understand?

BBianch

I understand that people who disagree have the right to challenge his claim that a national emergency exists .. and that they shoudn't be labeled t*****rs because they believe he doesn't have the authority to do what he's doing .. I'm sure they have access to what you've posted, and apparently they don't agree .. they have the right under our Constitution to make their case .. as I said earlier, it should be interesting ..

Sicilianthing

>>>

They can challenge all they want all day and all night but they’re wrong
They’re t*****rs too
Yes he has the authority it’s already written into his powers as Pres
They dont have to agree and they will Lose flat out.
They do have the right under the Constitution to go to court and Lose like the Losers they are !
You’re right it’s going to be interesting, throttling and Fast too.

it’s quite Black and White.

I can expand on why I call them t*****rs too ...
Why M*****as call them all t*****rs
Why Patriots identify them as t*****rs
Why they’re all Marked now as t*****rs going forward for taking sides against True American Descendants on the land.

I’m glad you’re paying attention to this unlike so many others.
You can see the divisions growing further deepening the rift between Americans and what people think are Americans and it’s values.
I’ve told you guys for years escalations would continue and these divisions would arise out of that.
This is just the beginning.

The Battle For America has begun in 2019 and it gets uglier from here.
You just need to choose a side, like everyone else.

Isn’t it beautiful what’s coming ?

BBianch

The side I choose is our country ...

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Since the NEA was enacted in 1976, US presidents have declared national emergencies 58 times, 31 of those are still in effect.

The NEA specifically empowers the president to use FUNDS ALREADY APPROPRIATED by congress for funding EXECUTIVE OPERATIONS. IOW, money with congress' stamp on it is available for the POTUS to use any damned way he pleases.