Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Again with the moronic baseless claims, When have I ever said that ANY news sources was 100% unbiased? You seem so full of lies, only a Trump supporter can believe ANYTHING you say. When I judge a news source, I judge on LEAST biased, because there is NO SUCH THING AS UNBIASED. You need to work on your comprehension sk**ls either that or your ethics, one of those are severely lacking.
I am done with this post, I have an intolerance to stupidity (I suspect this moron to be quite stupid) and I have an intolerance to lies, if this moron isn't as stupid as I suspect than he is obviously a pathological liar and I am done with this. The remainder of the post is hereby ignored.
Again with the moronic baseless claims, When have ... (
show quote)
This is a rather long post but please bear with me. This is in response to a rebuttal posted by Common Sense Matters.
I posted;
On March, , 2018, from 3:30 PM to 11:00 Pm, on the subject of Trumps campaign aide, Sam Nunberg, CNN spent 3 hours and 50 minutes, while for EVERYTHING else, only 1 hour 23 minutes.
The Washington Examiner; CNN obsessed 92% of air time on Trump, with 97 critics and only 7 supporters.
The Washington Times; How much does CNN h**e Trump? 93% of coverage is negative.
National Public Radio;Fully two-thirds of news stories about Trump from his first 60 days in office were negative by that definition β more than twice the negativity seen in stories from the first 60 days of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush or Barack Obama's presidencies.
Common Sense replied
Quote:
It looks as though the two sites you mentioned are Both conservative sites, they may be judging too harshly.
Is that not saying that CNN is conservative? but he replied;
Quote:
Completely moronic lie, I have NEVER said any such thing and the fact that you chose to put forth such a lie tells more of your character (or lack thereof) than it says about me.
What do you think...did he say it or not?
I posted;
4. Fox never caused a 350% one day drop in the stock market as ABC did. I guess their factual too, huh?
Common Sense replied;
[quote]I would think that falls more on the heads of the panicky morons that fly off the handle over a story apparently (by your claim) only carried by one media source.[quote/]
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/false-reporting-by-abc-news-caused-a-350-point-drop-in-stock-market-today/73903017/https://www.rt.com/usa/411719-abc-f**e-news-trump-flynn/https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/01/abcs-flynn-trump-report-caused-panic-in-the-stock-market-then-they-corrected-the-story-video/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/12/03/abc-news-apologizes-fohttps://money.cnn.com/2017/12/01/media/abc-news-flynn-correction/index.htmlhttps://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/abcs-brian-ross-should-be-fired/https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/12/01/abc-news-scorched-over-correction-to-flynn-story-that-tanked-the-stock-marketI believe that these refrences to the ABC story prove that it was reported by many sources. I list only a few.
I posted;
5. I am NOT defending Fox. Fox is one of many biased news outlets, the only difference being that they are more conservative. To pull Fox out of the crowd to badger is discriminatory. Why did you not badger ALL MSM as biased?
Common Sense posted earlier;
I wouldn't know what all CNN and NBC (MSNBC according to you) cover, whether it is ONLY Trump as you say or many topics as I would suspect. Oh, and it was NBC mentioned, not MSNBC, even though NBC IS one of the parent companies of MSNBC, I am sure their programming is quite different.
Then he repiled later;
I have watched Fox news, I have read Fox news, I am not a brain dead moron that completely misses the loaded statements, the misquotes, the obvious leanings and the outright convoluted conspiracy theories spouted off on by certain of their personalities. Perhaps if one wanted to actually know the t***h, one might open one's eyes.
You don't have to watch news 24/7 to be informed, hell, I don't even leave my T.V. on 24/7, Perhaps others might want to turn the i***t box off once in a while themselves.
So, I say,"Which is it? You DON'T watch the news or you DO?
Then finally;
I am done with this post, I have an intolerance to stupidity (I suspect this moron to be quite stupid) and I have an intolerance to lies, if this moron isn't as stupid as I suspect than he is obviously a pathological liar and I am done with this. The remainder of the post is hereby ignored.
So, since he is ignoring me, I'm posting this to let everyone know that I backed up every claim I made with facts, while he offered not one.
I called him no names, yet I am a moron, stupid, a pathological liar, and blind to the t***h. He also refuses to debate with me any more, probably because his remarks are just "what he said" with no facts. Most people that have facts present them.
Most people keep up with what they say so as not to contradict themselves.
He has only proved himself to be intolerant, while belonging to the "tolerant" party!