Ann Coulter calls out Trump for s**mming the stupidest in his base.
jSmitty45 wrote:
Agree, I don't much care for her anymore.
Me, either, Smitty. Her ultimate goal is to sell books and make $$$ … to get face time on talk shows and have her name brought up in the media in an effort to accomplish that goal. And I think she seeks attention through controversy in order to make that happen. That's all it is about. Attention and money. At this point, she is simply annoying .. and not very bright. IMHO.
CarryOn wrote:
Me, either, Smitty. Her ultimate goal is to sell books and make $$$ … to get face time on talk shows and have her name brought up in the media in an effort to accomplish that goal. And I think she seeks attention through controversy in order to make that happen. That's all it is about. Attention and money. At this point, she is simply annoying .. and not very bright. IMHO.
>>>
That’s not really the case, but, anyone has the right to market their work and themselves... I’m not knocking her for that.
If you listen to what she has to say, she’s 98% or more correct on the issues.
I dont like her ragging on Trump but somebody’s got to do it.
Trump has waffled too many times until now and nothing has really happened.
If you’re in this camp we’re looking for a specific series of actions he ran on that are NON Negotiable to keep his contract with Patriots.
Sicilianthing: non-negotiable?
Remember our C****e President Ronald Reagan? He said he'd settle for 80% and worry about the 29% later. Doesn't sound like a modern conservative.
If Trump is a good negotiator, let him handle it his way.
The goal isn't to win skirmishes, but to win the war.
In the long run Trump's legacy will be the Supreme Court and federal judgeships.
If the Republicans in Congress stand in his way its all for nothing anyway.
>>>
We are no longer interested in deals
Compromise or
Negotiations that trade progress for past failures, that’s what got all of you into this mess.
PJT wrote:
Sicilianthing: non-negotiable?
Remember our C****e President Ronald Reagan? He said he'd settle for 80% and worry about the 29% later. Doesn't sound like a modern conservative.
If Trump is a good negotiator, let him handle it his way.
The goal isn't to win skirmishes, but to win the war.
In the long run Trump's legacy will be the Supreme Court and federal judgeships.
If the Republicans in Congress stand in his way its all for nothing anyway.
>>>
That’s not good enough for us sorry but you can go ahead and settle for that, just don’t get our way.
Sicilianthing: its your attitude in those remarks that brought us so deeply into this era of h**e. All or nothing is destructive. 8fthings continue from your side and the Dems side I see the Dems winning...for a time. It could be years or eons.
Remember the march of history is not chaos to progress....shazzam. Its gradually forward. Sometimes regression. Sometimes 2 steps forward and 1 step back.
Sometimes it takes wars, civil wars and revolutions. Although I find most revolutions are really destructive and counter-productive--Russia Rev. French Rev. Even American Rev.,
But that's another very long discussion.
PJT wrote:
Sicilianthing: its your attitude in those remarks that brought us so deeply into this era of h**e. All or nothing is destructive. 8fthings continue from your side and the Dems side I see the Dems winning...for a time. It could be years or eons.
Remember the march of history is not chaos to progress....shazzam. Its gradually forward. Sometimes regression. Sometimes 2 steps forward and 1 step back.
Sometimes it takes wars, civil wars and revolutions. Although I find most revolutions are really destructive and counter-productive--Russia Rev. French Rev. Even American Rev.,
But that's another very long discussion.
Sicilianthing: its your attitude in those remarks... (
show quote)
>>>
Noted
It’s just that the trail of wreckage outweighs the reversal toward our sovereignty and restorations.
CarryOn wrote:
Me, either, Smitty. Her ultimate goal is to sell books and make $$$ … to get face time on talk shows and have her name brought up in the media in an effort to accomplish that goal. And I think she seeks attention through controversy in order to make that happen. That's all it is about. Attention and money. At this point, she is simply annoying .. and not very bright. IMHO.
Ann Coulter got her juris doctor from the University of Michigan. She has clerked for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and worked for the US Senate Judiciary Committee. She is a nationally syndicated columnist and the author of 12 books that have sold a total of 3 million copies. I would say that qualifies as "bright."
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Ann Coulter got her juris doctor from the University of Michigan. She has clerked for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and worked for the US Senate Judiciary Committee. She is a nationally syndicated columnist and the author of 12 books that have sold a total of 3 million copies. I would say that qualifies as "bright."
>>>
Thank YOU Seriously Smedley, she deserves the credit that is due and more than qualified.
Coulter tried to walk all back the negative Trumpy comments on Hugh Hewits Radio show a little while ago,
She says its the congress and the donors who are at fault now...the tall skinny girl seeks attention...
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Ann Coulter got her juris doctor from the University of Michigan. She has clerked for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and worked for the US Senate Judiciary Committee. She is a nationally syndicated columnist and the author of 12 books that have sold a total of 3 million copies. I would say that qualifies as "bright."
Smedley … I stand corrected on my comment about her not being very bright, as I was unaware of her educational background and her work experience. BUT I stand by my comment about her seeking attention through controversy in order to get air time and sell her books. It appears to be working. That is, of course, just my opinion.
CarryOn wrote:
Smedley … I stand corrected on my comment about her not being very bright, as I was unaware of her educational background and her work experience. BUT I stand by my comment about her seeking attention through controversy in order to get air time and sell her books. It appears to be working. That is, of course, just my opinion.
Her books have sold more than 3 million copies so it must be working. I don't always agree with her either.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.