One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Deficit spending by Presidents
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 13, 2014 20:36:09   #
Airforceone
 
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. Bush 41. 54%. Reagan. + 186 %. Carter + 43%. Was very surprised when I found this. There was just one exception and that was Obama his budget had to include the Bush tax cuts TARP 2 wars and Medicare part D which was the pharmaceutical drug bill. And also the high unemployment and loosing 750,000 jobs per month for the 1st 2 months that actually ran unemployment up to 11% and that and the Bush tax cuts there was a lot more revenue lost . If this got added to Bush 43 he would be a lot higher.

Reply
May 13, 2014 20:44:20   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
tdsrnest wrote:
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. Bush 41. 54%. Reagan. + 186 %. Carter + 43%. Was very surprised when I found this. There was just one exception and that was Obama his budget had to include the Bush tax cuts TARP 2 wars and Medicare part D which was the pharmaceutical drug bill. And also the high unemployment and loosing 750,000 jobs per month for the 1st 2 months that actually ran unemployment up to 11% and that and the Bush tax cuts there was a lot more revenue lost . If this got added to Bush 43 he would be a lot higher.
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. ... (show quote)


These are percentages of what and could you cite your source.

Reply
May 13, 2014 22:39:53   #
Airforceone
 
mwdegutis wrote:
These are percentages of what and could you cite your source.


Percentages of deficit increase I googled it and read left and right articles and they both matched

Reply
 
 
May 13, 2014 22:48:38   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
tdsrnest wrote:
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. Bush 41. 54%. Reagan. + 186 %. Carter + 43%. Was very surprised when I found this. There was just one exception and that was Obama his budget had to include the Bush tax cuts TARP 2 wars and Medicare part D which was the pharmaceutical drug bill. And also the high unemployment and loosing 750,000 jobs per month for the 1st 2 months that actually ran unemployment up to 11% and that and the Bush tax cuts there was a lot more revenue lost . If this got added to Bush 43 he would be a lot higher.
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. ... (show quote)


If I had any deficits, I'd spend them too, just as fast as I could get them.

Reply
May 13, 2014 23:14:10   #
Airforceone
 
lpnmajor wrote:
If I had any deficits, I'd spend them too, just as fast as I could get them.


Let's get some deficits I am retired I am going to Las Vages can you lend me some of your deficits.

Reply
May 13, 2014 23:46:43   #
John C. Hyland
 
Sorry about that, but you assessment is way off base.
You can't figure in anything that happened in the Bush Presidency!
And besides, the Democrats took over Congress in the 2006 e******n. So, they, the Liberals, had control of all spending, budgets, etc., starting in 2007!
Before they took over, Bush had his deficit going down for three straight years. At that point it was only $1.5 trillion deficit. Now it is $17.6 T. and growing daily since Liberals and Obama took over.
Bush unemployment set records at 4.4%. Economists figure it is really near 20% now. Bush had record employment. Record Tax returns from Corporations at 46%! Near 10 million new jobs created. A record 52 straight periods of GDP growth. All down the drain when the Dems took over in 2007 and Obama running the Senate at that point! Then Obama took over completely in 2009. (All because of the B****s v****g color (96%) instead of looking for some t***h, integrity in a President). Had it been a 96% white v**e for Bush, there would have been r**ts.
Got it now!
God bless.......,JCH

Reply
May 14, 2014 00:16:03   #
funguy1949
 
tdsrnest wrote:
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. Bush 41. 54%. Reagan. + 186 %. Carter + 43%. Was very surprised when I found this. There was just one exception and that was Obama his budget had to include the Bush tax cuts TARP 2 wars and Medicare part D which was the pharmaceutical drug bill. And also the high unemployment and loosing 750,000 jobs per month for the 1st 2 months that actually ran unemployment up to 11% and that and the Bush tax cuts there was a lot more revenue lost . If this got added to Bush 43 he would be a lot higher.
Obama. + 43% Bush + 101%. Clinton +32%. ... (show quote)



More liberal BS get your head on right you libertard the obama dogs deficit has amounted to well over 12 trillion it would have been more but the other went on bush's deficit
Try addin another 7- 10million is more like unemployed now cause of his BS aca/tax cuts were in place before obama dog got in,plus he would only have spent it on the F^&%#@ welfare leache's.
For Reagon he was all for the middle class tax payer who by the way contributes 75-85% of taxe's payed into the goverment and all your obama BS liberal dog has done or is doing now is distroying it.so why don't you just take 2 fingers put one in your potty mouth an the other where the sun don't shine an switch it out every time the music stops.
brianwashed/braindead/deaf/dum/blind demwit liberal.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2014 00:21:45   #
Airforceone
 
John C. Hyland wrote:
Sorry about that, but you assessment is way off base.
You can't figure in anything that happened in the Bush Presidency!
And besides, the Democrats took over Congress in the 2006 e******n. So, they, the Liberals, had control of all spending, budgets, etc., starting in 2007!
Before they took over, Bush had his deficit going down for three straight years. At that point it was only $1.5 trillion deficit. Now it is $17.6 T. and growing daily since Liberals and Obama took over.
Bush unemployment set records at 4.4%. Economists figure it is really near 20% now. Bush had record employment. Record Tax returns from Corporations at 46%! Near 10 million new jobs created. A record 52 straight periods of GDP growth. All down the drain when the Dems took over in 2007 and Obama running the Senate at that point! Then Obama took over completely in 2009. (All because of the B****s v****g color (96%) instead of looking for some t***h, integrity in a President). Had it been a 96% white v**e for Bush, there would have been r**ts.
Got it now!
God bless.......,JCH
Sorry about that, but you assessment is way off ba... (show quote)


You must be living in Disneyland you have to a very low IQ bush still had the Senate 50 to 50 and war crimes Channey was the tie breaker. Dems in the house tried to put back the regulations after War crimes bush deregulated. Oh so b****s can't v**e what about women what about Hispanics do they have the right to v**e. Wow so what you are saying is the Republican Party is fat whit rich and r****t. The democrats have deversety. So I got an idea do something for the poor and middle class because the only jobs plan you have is tax breaks for the rich. And we know how that worked we Bush.

Reply
May 14, 2014 00:24:49   #
funguy1949
 
John C. Hyland wrote:
Sorry about that, but you assessment is way off base.
You can't figure in anything that happened in the Bush Presidency!
And besides, the Democrats took over Congress in the 2006 e******n. So, they, the Liberals, had control of all spending, budgets, etc., starting in 2007!
Before they took over, Bush had his deficit going down for three straight years. At that point it was only $1.5 trillion deficit. Now it is $17.6 T. and growing daily since Liberals and Obama took over.
Bush unemployment set records at 4.4%. Economists figure it is really near 20% now. Bush had record employment. Record Tax returns from Corporations at 46%! Near 10 million new jobs created. A record 52 straight periods of GDP growth. All down the drain when the Dems took over in 2007 and Obama running the Senate at that point! Then Obama took over completely in 2009. (All because of the B****s v****g color (96%) instead of looking for some t***h, integrity in a President). Had it been a 96% white v**e for Bush, there would have been r**ts.
Got it now!
God bless.......,JCH
Sorry about that, but you assessment is way off ba... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Could not have said it any better :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: 100% right on :thumbup: :thumbup: An to think bush had to straten out what clinton's BS did not to mention what clinton did to Reagonomics.Which Reagon was very good for this nation then the liberals doubled crossed him an reniaged on thier promise's to him.

Reply
May 14, 2014 00:29:35   #
Airforceone
 
funguy1949 wrote:
More liberal BS get your head on right you libertard the obama dogs deficit has amounted to well over 12 trillion it would have been more but the other went on bush's deficit
Try addin another 7- 10million is more like unemployed now cause of his BS aca/tax cuts were in place before obama dog got in,plus he would only have spent it on the F^&%#@ welfare leache's.
For Reagon he was all for the middle class tax payer who by the way contributes 75-85% of taxe's payed into the goverment and all your obama BS liberal dog has done or is doing now is distroying it.so why don't you just take 2 fingers put one in your potty mouth an the other where the sun don't shine an switch it out every time the music stops.
brianwashed/braindead/deaf/dum/blind demwit liberal.
More liberal BS get your head on right you liberta... (show quote)


Reagan raised Taxes on the middle class 11 times just google Reagan tax increases. The total tax increase to the middle class was $132 billion now factore in inflation if you know what that means. And your buddy Ronny boy increased the deficit by 186%. Just google deficit by presidents. And yes the middle class pays the lions share of the taxes and Bush pushed 20 % of the middle class into poverty. Now that. 20% ended up on welfare and food stamps just google all this stuff it's there if know how to read .

Reply
May 14, 2014 00:32:21   #
Airforceone
 
funguy1949 wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Could not have said it any better :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: 1005 right on :thumbup: :thumbup: An to think bush had to straten out what clinton's BS did not to mention what he did to reagonnomics.


What the hell is wrong with you two. Where did you find those facts.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2014 00:40:00   #
Airforceone
 
funguy1949 wrote:
More liberal BS get your head on right you libertard the obama dogs deficit has amounted to well over 12 trillion it would have been more but the other went on bush's deficit
Try addin another 7- 10million is more like unemployed now cause of his BS aca/tax cuts were in place before obama dog got in,plus he would only have spent it on the F^&%#@ welfare leache's.
For Reagon he was all for the middle class tax payer who by the way contributes 75-85% of taxe's payed into the goverment and all your obama BS liberal dog has done or is doing now is distroying it.so why don't you just take 2 fingers put one in your potty mouth an the other where the sun don't shine an switch it out every time the music stops.
brianwashed/braindead/deaf/dum/blind demwit liberal.
More liberal BS get your head on right you liberta... (show quote)


He raised the taxes on middle class 11 times google Reagan tax increases it right there at your finger tips he did absolutely nothing for the middle class. And also google deficits by presidents it's at your finger tips you moron if your looking for the t***h. I just can't believe how people can be so uninformed with the technology today it's at your finger tips look it up. That finger tip things was good really original. Shows your IQ

Reply
May 14, 2014 00:51:48   #
funguy1949
 
tdsrnest wrote:
You must be living in Disneyland you have to a very low IQ bush still had the Senate 50 to 50 and war crimes Channey was the tie breaker. Dems in the house tried to put back the regulations after War crimes bush deregulated. Oh so b****s can't v**e what about women what about Hispanics do they have the right to v**e. Wow so what you are saying is the Republican Party is fat whit rich and r****t. The democrats have deversety. So I got an idea do something for the poor and middle class because the only jobs plan you have is tax breaks for the rich. And we know how that worked we Bush.
You must be living in Disneyland you have to a ver... (show quote)


You are nothing but a brainwashed/braindead demwit you just don't get what was being said,about the v****g froud that put your obama dog into office not to mention all the one's on welfare.oh and another thing you act like there are no rich lib's for your info there are far more rich lib's than rich conservatives. & some of them are b****s.so why don't you go stuff that where the sun don't shine!When Reagon was in office I had more money in my pocket then than I had with anyother president before him so how did I have more when he was suppose to have increase tax's more Bs liberal properganda,your drinking in far too much liberal cool aid.

Reply
May 14, 2014 06:21:51   #
jasfourth401
 
tdsrnest wrote:
What the hell is wrong with you two. Where did you find those facts.


The posts you are referring to are classic examples of why this country is headed toward disaster. They don't have a clue about reality.

There is nothing complicated about how we got to a 17 trillion federal debt level. It is not a democratic issue. It is not a republican issue. It is an unfunded liabilities issue.

The term unfunded liabilities is used by the government to identify programs that the government executed without earmarking any money to pay for them. And four of them have added 10.7 trillion to the debt since 1996, when the debt stood at 5.8 trillion.

Carry forward interest (6.7 trillion), middle east wars (2 trillion), Bush era tax cuts (1.5 trillion) and medicare Part D (500 billion).

It is simple to understand. It is not political. Unfunded liabilities need to be outlawed.

Reply
May 14, 2014 08:04:16   #
Airforceone
 
funguy1949 wrote:
You are nothing but a brainwashed/braindead demwit you just don't get what was being said,about the v****g froud that put your obama dog into office not to mention all the one's on welfare.oh and another thing you act like there are no rich lib's for your info there are far more rich lib's than rich conservatives. & some of them are b****s.so why don't you go stuff that where the sun don't shine!When Reagon was in office I had more money in my pocket then than I had with anyother president before him so how did I have more when he was suppose to have increase tax's more Bs liberal properganda,your drinking in far too much liberal cool aid.
You are nothing but a brainwashed/braindead demwit... (show quote)


Wow very intelligent. Still haven 't told me what v***r f***d and what tax increase. Yes less money in your pocket is because middle class wages have not gone up because of income and e******y . To try and explain the tea party folks want tax breaks for the wealthy and hope it trinkles down in the form of jobs . But it's been. 30 years since Reagun put trickle down and it has not the upper 3.% wage earners have gone up 270% you have only gone up. 7% so with inflation your actually making less. Stop your insults and drop the hatrage for the black guy . The facts are there just google it . I don 't make these facts up.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.