One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Speech
Page <<first <prev 30 of 39 next> last>>
Feb 10, 2019 13:58:11   #
Morgan
 
JFlorio wrote:
We will never agree on c*****e c****e so wrecking the economy as some of the more brilliant New Democrats suggest is just stupid. Private ownership will solve most problems not govt forcing us to change our way of life. Who’s been in charge of education for years? The teachers unions but somehow you blame Trump. Plain stupid. We have excellent healthcare when measure by the same parameters other countries use. Our costs are what’s out of control. Just when did we lead in healthcare and education? Certainly wasn’t under Obama or Bush yet you blame Trump. You are so h**eful you cannot debate honestly.
We will never agree on c*****e c****e so wrecking ... (show quote)


To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the environmental deregulations, and what is stupid is allowing industry to behave irresponsibly to any of their waste, where the top rankers enjoy the profitable benefits and the rest of us, (all of life), suffer their consequences, while they suffer nothing and only gain. Meanwhile, the so-call trickle down is almost non-existent.

You seem to think private ownership is the end all answer, shall I point out during the era of the industrial revolution, when responsibility was left up to the proprietors, what took place, if you don't recall, I would suggest reading some of the Dickerson novels.

You asked what some shortcoming s were, I put some of them up, only mentioned Trump to one, yet you balled it all together, that's on you, not me.

You overuse the word h**e, I don't h**e people, though I may h**e conditions. I seek improvement where it is sorely needed. I admit we are not perfect, or the best we can be, that is something to work towards.

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 13:58:20   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Morgan wrote:
For what the US carbon footprint is, we Now do little to improve our status due to Trump's deregulations and wherever we have is done by private ownership/enterprise. We are considered critical status, we don't even rate unsatisfactory. This is nowhere where we lead, just as we don't lead in education or healthcare.

Is this the emperors new clothing? Because I'm not seeing any economic booming, wall street is not our economy, but yes, they are the ones who are benefiting the most and owning most of the US wealth.

The World’s Top 3 Emitters Contribute 14 Times the Emissions of the Bottom 100

The top three greenhouse gas emitters— China, the European Union and the United States—contribute more than half of total global emissions, while the bottom 100 countries only account for 3.5 percent.1 Collectively, the top 10 emitters account for nearly three-quarters of global emissions. The world can’t successfully tackle the c*****e c****e challenge without significant action from these countries.

http://www.wri.org/blog/2017/04/interactive-chart-explains-worlds-top-10-emitters-and-how-theyve-changed
For what the US carbon footprint is, we Now do lit... (show quote)


Morgan!!!
CO2 is food for plants. (basic biology used to be taught in high school)
There is no problem with CO2 emissions and supposed MAN MADE g****l W*****g.
Do you have a proposal to plug volcanoes?
Is there a way to tax volcanoes?

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 14:21:15   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Bad Bob wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2019 14:35:46   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Yep!!
https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2019/2/10/t1-516624-cortez20.jpg

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 14:41:28   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Morgan wrote:
To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the environmental deregulations, and what is stupid is allowing industry to behave irresponsibly to any of their waste, where the top rankers enjoy the profitable benefits and the rest of us, (all of life), suffer their consequences, while they suffer nothing and only gain. Meanwhile, the so-call trickle down is almost non-existent.

You seem to think private ownership is the end all answer, shall I point out during the era of the industrial revolution, when responsibility was left up to the proprietors, what took place, if you don't recall, I would suggest reading some of the Dickerson novels.

You asked what some shortcoming s were, I put some of them up, only mentioned Trump to one, yet you balled it all together, that's on you, not me.

You overuse the word h**e, I don't h**e people, though I may h**e conditions. I seek improvement where it is sorely needed. I admit we are not perfect, or the best we can be, that is something to work towards.
To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the envi... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 10, 2019 14:41:30   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Morgan wrote:
To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the environmental deregulations, and what is stupid is allowing industry to behave irresponsibly to any of their waste, where the top rankers enjoy the profitable benefits and the rest of us, (all of life), suffer their consequences, while they suffer nothing and only gain. Meanwhile, the so-call trickle down is almost non-existent.

You seem to think private ownership is the end all answer, shall I point out during the era of the industrial revolution, when responsibility was left up to the proprietors, what took place, if you don't recall, I would suggest reading some of the Dickerson novels.

You asked what some shortcoming s were, I put some of them up, only mentioned Trump to one, yet you balled it all together, that's on you, not me.

You overuse the word h**e, I don't h**e people, though I may h**e conditions. I seek improvement where it is sorely needed. I admit we are not perfect, or the best we can be, that is something to work towards.
To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the envi... (show quote)


"To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the environmental deregulations, and what is stupid is allowing industry to behave irresponsibly to any of their waste, where the top rankers enjoy the profitable benefits and the rest of us, (all of life), suffer their consequences,..."

Morgan!!!
CO2 is food for plants. (basic biology used to be taught in high school)
There is no problem with CO2 emissions and supposed MAN MADE g****l W*****g.
Do you have a proposal to plug volcanoes?
Is there a way to tax volcanoes?

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 14:46:51   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Just so you know there’s a hell of a difference between over regulation and deregulation. Some of the so called deregulatory things trump has done is to eliminate two or three fed and state agencies doing the same thing. Wasting billions. The courts have pretty well balanced out the polluters. They can now be sued for willfully hurting the environment. No one likes the outdoors more than I do. I would rather spend billions actually fighting pollution then by giving said billions to the UN in the name of C*****e C****e to be redistributed. I’ll never figure you people out. The UN has admitted the Paris Accords would have no affect on temperatures. Yet I guess it makes you moonbats feel good. .
Morgan wrote:
To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the environmental deregulations, and what is stupid is allowing industry to behave irresponsibly to any of their waste, where the top rankers enjoy the profitable benefits and the rest of us, (all of life), suffer their consequences, while they suffer nothing and only gain. Meanwhile, the so-call trickle down is almost non-existent.

You seem to think private ownership is the end all answer, shall I point out during the era of the industrial revolution, when responsibility was left up to the proprietors, what took place, if you don't recall, I would suggest reading some of the Dickerson novels.

You asked what some shortcoming s were, I put some of them up, only mentioned Trump to one, yet you balled it all together, that's on you, not me.

You overuse the word h**e, I don't h**e people, though I may h**e conditions. I seek improvement where it is sorely needed. I admit we are not perfect, or the best we can be, that is something to work towards.
To clarify your reply, I blamed Trump for the envi... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2019 14:46:55   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 



Reply
Feb 10, 2019 16:04:12   #
Morgan
 
You can attach your quote and post'it to Trump's head. LOL Only difference is she's not a liar and has integrity.

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 16:05:15   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Morgan wrote:
For what the US carbon footprint is, we Now do little to improve our status due to Trump's deregulations and wherever we have is done by private ownership/enterprise. We are considered critical status, we don't even rate unsatisfactory. This is nowhere where we lead, just as we don't lead in education or healthcare.

Is this the emperors new clothing? Because I'm not seeing any economic booming, wall street is not our economy, but yes, they are the ones who are benefiting the most and owning most of the US wealth.

The World’s Top 3 Emitters Contribute 14 Times the Emissions of the Bottom 100

The top three greenhouse gas emitters— China, the European Union and the United States—contribute more than half of total global emissions, while the bottom 100 countries only account for 3.5 percent.1 Collectively, the top 10 emitters account for nearly three-quarters of global emissions. The world can’t successfully tackle the c*****e c****e challenge without significant action from these countries.

http://www.wri.org/blog/2017/04/interactive-chart-explains-worlds-top-10-emitters-and-how-theyve-changed
For what the US carbon footprint is, we Now do lit... (show quote)


You are a leader in The New Vegan Church Of Modern Day Chicken Littlists.
...ha, as if we could affect the climate.
12 years huh? That's all we have left before the gods of Gore and The Great Obama and She Guevara punish humanity for living well?
Bullmueller. Crazy Chicken Littlists.

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 16:18:27   #
Morgan
 
JFlorio wrote:
Just so you know there’s a hell of a difference between over regulation and deregulation. Some of the so called deregulatory things trump has done is to eliminate two or three fed and state agencies doing the same thing. Wasting billions. The courts have pretty well balanced out the polluters. They can now be sued for willfully hurting the environment. No one likes the outdoors more than I do. I would rather spend billions actually fighting pollution then by giving said billions to the UN in the name of C*****e C****e to be redistributed. I’ll never figure you people out. The UN has admitted the Paris Accords would have no affect on temperatures. Yet I guess it makes you moonbats feel good. .
Just so you know there’s a hell of a difference be... (show quote)


The propaganda has you against the UN, not a surprise, as they have you against every government organization or office, and you Loone's everything they say.

70 Ways the UN makes a differencehttp://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/compose-post-screen?topicnum=152284&rpostnum=2740992&quote=true


43. Seeking solutions to c*****e c****e

C*****e c****e is a global problem that demands a global solution. The United Nations has been at the forefront in assessing the science and forging a political solution. The Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e, which brings together 2,000 leading c*****e c****e scientists, issues comprehensive scientific assessments every five or six years: in 2007, it concluded with certainty that c*****e c****e was occurring and that human activities were a primary cause. The 196 members of the UN Framework Convention on C*****e C****e are negotiating agreements to reduce emissions that contribute to c*****e c****e and help countries adapt to its effects. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and other UN agencies have been at the forefront in raising awareness.
44. Helping Countries to Cope with C*****e C****e

The UN helps developing countries to respond to the challenges of global c*****e c****e. Thirty-nine UN bodies have formed a partnership to deal comprehensively with the problem. For instance, the Global Environment Facility, which brings together 10 UN agencies, funds projects in developing countries. As the financial mechanism of the Climate Convention, it allocates about $550 million per year in projects on new technologies, energy efficiency, renewable energies and sustainable t***sportation.

#
45. Protecting the Environment

The United Nations is working to solve global environmental problems. As an international forum for building consensus and negotiating agreements, the UN is tackling global problems such as ozone layer depletion, toxic waste, loss of forests and species, and air and water pollution. Unless these problems are addressed, markets and economies will not be sustainable in the long term, as environmental losses are depleting the natural capital on which growth and human survival are based.
46. Protecting the Ozone Layer

The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) have been instrumental in highlighting the damage caused to Earth's ozone layer. As a result of a treaty known as the Montreal Protocol, countries have been phasing out chemicals that cause the depletion of the ozone layer and replacing them with safer alternatives. This will spare millions of people from contracting skin cancer because of exposure to increased ultraviolet radiation.
47. Providing Safe Drinking Water

During the first UN decade on water (1981-1990), more than a billion people gained access to safe drinking water for the first time in their lives. By 2002, another 1.1 billion people had clean water. In 2003, the International Year of Freshwater raised awareness of the importance of protecting this precious resource. The second international water decade (2005-2015) aims to reduce by half the number of people without a source of clean drinking water.

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2019 16:49:12   #
Bcon
 
slatten49 wrote:
In the eyes, hearts and minds of Marines, Sailors are rarely acceptable...Corpsmen being the exceptions.


Funny, as a navy vet, we were always told the the marines were the naval police force. When did that change?

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 17:00:27   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Bcon wrote:
Funny, as a navy vet, we were always told the the marines were the naval police force. When did that change?

Nothing's changed, Bcon, to include good-natured interservice joking and rivalries.

As corpsmen are/were often assigned to Marines units, those familiar with me would know that my comment was meant both in respect and jest.

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 17:10:38   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Morgan!!!
CO2 is food for plants. (basic biology used to be taught in high school)
There is no problem with CO2 emissions and supposed MAN MADE g****l W*****g.
Do you have a proposal to plug volcanoes?
Is there a way to tax volcanoes?


Very true. Facts are that Water Vapor accounts for 95 percent of the greenhouse effect.the remaining 5 percent all other gasses. CO2 about 3 percent and the human contribution under one percent as most CO2 comes from totally natural sources. There is nothing we can do short of creating a nuclear winter tat would change climate. Otherwise only the SUN and its' cycles can do so. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=you+tube+global+warming+h**x+explained+for+dummies&view=detail&mid=6926B7242ABBBB6D677D6926B7242ABBBB6D677D&FORM=VIRE

Reply
Feb 10, 2019 17:32:00   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Gee. No bias in those reports. I’m sure the UN has no agenda. You should have been a sword swallower in the circus since you’ll swallow anything. Quick question. Since you believe the UN really cares what’s their workable solution?
Morgan wrote:
The propaganda has you against the UN, not a surprise, as they have you against every government organization or office, and you Loone's everything they say.

70 Ways the UN makes a differencehttp://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/compose-post-screen?topicnum=152284&rpostnum=2740992&quote=true


43. Seeking solutions to c*****e c****e

C*****e c****e is a global problem that demands a global solution. The United Nations has been at the forefront in assessing the science and forging a political solution. The Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e, which brings together 2,000 leading c*****e c****e scientists, issues comprehensive scientific assessments every five or six years: in 2007, it concluded with certainty that c*****e c****e was occurring and that human activities were a primary cause. The 196 members of the UN Framework Convention on C*****e C****e are negotiating agreements to reduce emissions that contribute to c*****e c****e and help countries adapt to its effects. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and other UN agencies have been at the forefront in raising awareness.
44. Helping Countries to Cope with C*****e C****e

The UN helps developing countries to respond to the challenges of global c*****e c****e. Thirty-nine UN bodies have formed a partnership to deal comprehensively with the problem. For instance, the Global Environment Facility, which brings together 10 UN agencies, funds projects in developing countries. As the financial mechanism of the Climate Convention, it allocates about $550 million per year in projects on new technologies, energy efficiency, renewable energies and sustainable t***sportation.

#
45. Protecting the Environment

The United Nations is working to solve global environmental problems. As an international forum for building consensus and negotiating agreements, the UN is tackling global problems such as ozone layer depletion, toxic waste, loss of forests and species, and air and water pollution. Unless these problems are addressed, markets and economies will not be sustainable in the long term, as environmental losses are depleting the natural capital on which growth and human survival are based.
46. Protecting the Ozone Layer

The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) have been instrumental in highlighting the damage caused to Earth's ozone layer. As a result of a treaty known as the Montreal Protocol, countries have been phasing out chemicals that cause the depletion of the ozone layer and replacing them with safer alternatives. This will spare millions of people from contracting skin cancer because of exposure to increased ultraviolet radiation.
47. Providing Safe Drinking Water

During the first UN decade on water (1981-1990), more than a billion people gained access to safe drinking water for the first time in their lives. By 2002, another 1.1 billion people had clean water. In 2003, the International Year of Freshwater raised awareness of the importance of protecting this precious resource. The second international water decade (2005-2015) aims to reduce by half the number of people without a source of clean drinking water.
The propaganda has you against the UN, not a surpr... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 30 of 39 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.