https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of t***sparency and/or is f**e news. F**e News is the deliberate attempt to publish h**xes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered f**e news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/p***********e, use of poor sources and failed fact checks.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership T***sparency
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
American Thinker is a conservative news and opinion blog, founded in 2003 by Thomas Lifson (He writes frequently for the conspiracy site The Liberty Beacon) and Health Care consultant Richard Baehr (he also writes frequently for PJ Media, Jewish Policy Center, and Israel Hayom). Both Liftson and Baehr are Kenyon Collage Alumni. According to an interview with Richard Baehr, he originally launched the website as a forum: “I think we have one of the most thoughtful online forums out there,” Thomas Lifson is currently the Editor and Publisher of the site.

Funded by / Ownership
The American Thinker does not disclose who owns the website. The website is funded through donations and online ads, as well as offering an “ad-free experience for a small fee.”
Analysis / Bias
American Thinker consist of two sections, one is articles and the other one is blog. You can check out their archives Here.

In review, American Thinker uses strong emotionally loaded language in their headlines such as: “The Most Memorable L*****t Hypocrisies of 2017-8”. This article is authored by Robert Oscar Lopez who writes with extremely biased language: “The left is composed of horrible people. Most sane people realize this, even if they have friends on the dark side.” Another article with loaded wording is this one: “The Great Depression of 2019?”

Although, they utilize credible sources such as thebalance.com, CNBC, New York Times, The Guardian and factually mixed sources such as LifeZette, Wall Street Journal, Human Events.com, they also utilize questionable sources to back their claims, such as Breitbart and non-credible conservative blogs such as michaelsavage.com.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, American Thinker has published Anti-L**T articles, as well as those by prominent white nationalist, Jared Taylor.

Further, American Thinker routinely publishes conspiracy theories, such as those by Pamela Geller, who is also on the SPLC’s h**e watch list due to anti-Islam positions: Report: Obama said ‘I Am a Muslim’, which has been debunked as a false claim. They have also promoted conspiracies about the Seth Rich Murder and they have published numerous articles that are not supportive of the consensus of science, such as this one: The H**x of ‘C*****e C****e’
A factual search reveals a few failed fact checks.

President Obama secretly signaled solidarity to African leaders at the White House using a Muslim hand gesture known as the ‘Shahada.’ – FALSE
The state of New Jersey is currently conducting, or plans to conduct, house-to-house confiscations of banned high-capacity gun magazines. – FALSE

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/p***********e, use of poor sources and failed fact checks. (7/18/2016) (M. Huitsing 1/1/2019)
Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/

No matter which media source the story was taken from, Northam's own words remain the same. He said, "If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen," Northam, a pediatric neurosurgeon, told Washington radio station WTOP. "The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."

If that isn't infanticide, what is it?????