knightrider wrote:
Yep he was not a Liberal, cant have that, we have to stack the courts with the democrat mob, so boys can go in girls bath rooms and showers, girls can go boys bathrooms and showers in public schools!
got to be able to k**l them unborn babies, next will be the aged, got to be able to charge you with a crime, with out proof. yep judges are to be neutral, not any more!!
You think Kavanaugh is a neutral judge? He's harder right than Scalia was.
Well inform videos, I passed along to friends.
SinnieK wrote:
Well inform videos, I passed along to friends.
A lot of cable services do not carry One America News Network. (OAN)
My local cable service does not.
I am now on satellite.
woodguru wrote:
Trump is destroying this country in every single thing he touches.
I can understand your reasoning when good is evil and evil is good to you birds. If Midus had a golden touch your mob has a toilet paper touch!
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>
I dont think either one will go past the senate but I could be wrong since there are now 16 to 19 T*****rs in the GOP...
You see t*****rs, I see people who were elected to represent the good of those who elected them.
woodguru wrote:
You see t*****rs, I see people who were elected to represent the good of those who elected them.
Your Progressive concepts of good and evil, right and wrong are skewed beyond reason. That's why you're a Progressive.
padremike wrote:
Your Progressive concepts of good and evil, right and wrong are skewed beyond reason. That's why you're a Progressive.
That is why Progressives have to keep re branding them selves.
PaulPisces wrote:
Hi S! How's it going?
>>>
Ok I’m just reaching out and apologizing to anyone I’ve offended in the past because OPP is going to ban me permanently soon.
Sorry and you have a friend in me.
padremike wrote:
Your Progressive concepts of good and evil, right and wrong are skewed beyond reason. That's why you're a Progressive.
By the party who supports p*******es (Roy Moore and Trump) that have no regard for the law
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>
Ok I’m just reaching out and apologizing to anyone I’ve offended in the past because OPP is going to ban me permanently soon.
Sorry and you have a friend in me.
C'Mon, S. You can exercise a little restraint and stay in the fold!
woodguru wrote:
By the party who supports p*******es (Roy Moore and Trump) that have no regard for the law
If you claim I support p*******es you are a liar who believes lies strengthen his position. There is a defined mental sickness that identifies this sort of person. Furthermore, I know of no p*******e convictions against Moore or Trump do you? I realize that wh**ever untoward thoughts may be rattleing around inside your head like a BB in a box car is all you need to pull the switch and metaphorically execute someone. That's one reason you're just like a Stalinist era Marxist (Progressive). No balance!
padremike wrote:
If you claim I support p*******es you are a liar who believes lies strengthen his position. There is a defined mental sickness that identifies this sort of person. Furthermore, I know of no p*******e convictions against Moore or Trump do you? I realize that wh**ever untoward thoughts may be rattleing around inside your head like a BB in a box car is all you need to pull the switch and metaphorically execute someone. That's one reason you're just like a Stalinist era Marxist (Progressive). No balance!
If you claim I support p*******es you are a liar ... (
show quote)
So no convictions against Moore or Trump exonerate them, but having no convictions against HRC does not?
Just wondering how one is supposed to apply what is known equally.
padremike wrote:
If you claim I support p*******es you are a liar who believes lies strengthen his position. There is a defined mental sickness that identifies this sort of person. Furthermore, I know of no p*******e convictions against Moore or Trump do you? I realize that wh**ever untoward thoughts may be rattleing around inside your head like a BB in a box car is all you need to pull the switch and metaphorically execute someone. That's one reason you're just like a Stalinist era Marxist (Progressive). No balance!
If you claim I support p*******es you are a liar ... (
show quote)
There is a lot we do know about Trump, and knowing things does not take convictions or defenses of innocent until proven guilty. No prosecution was ever mounted against him for these things, we know from other evidence they are real, and it paints a picture of a p*******e. A p*******e is someone who will use underage girls, something that is against the law. Here are the things we do know, by both records, admissions, and parallel cases that obtained convictions.
...Trump had a modeling agency that dealt in and supported underage models
...By his own admission on Howard Stearns Trump liked going in the dressing rooms of Miss Teen pageants because he liked looking at half dressed and naked girls, because he could because he owned the pageant. How would you like to be the father of a teen being treated like that by Trump?
...Trump used to throw parties for his wealthy friends that had models as young as 14 and 15 that were abused by these men. Any sex, consensual or otherwise is illegal and a felony. We know this because one of his wealthy mentors was charged with felony rape of a minor that he plead guilty to for a vastly reduced sentence...and stuff your f**e news crap, these are facts.
Trump has had multiple cases brought surrounding the use of underage girls at parties, and those who give cover for things like this are part of the problem. The things that can't necessarily be proved are well supported by things that can.
PaulPisces wrote:
So no convictions against Moore or Trump exonerate them, but having no convictions against HRC does not?
Just wondering how one is supposed to apply what is known equally.
We know Hillary broke the law and it's uncontested but never charged yet! The proof is overwhelming.
Moore and Trump are charged in the mental madness minds of you progressives with no proof. That's all you need for conviction, it's your style of justice.
woodguru wrote:
There is a lot we do know about Trump, and knowing things does not take convictions or defenses of innocent until proven guilty. No prosecution was ever mounted against him for these things, we know from other evidence they are real, and it paints a picture of a p*******e. A p*******e is someone who will use underage girls, something that is against the law. Here are the things we do know, by both records, admissions, and parallel cases that obtained convictions.
...Trump had a modeling agency that dealt in and supported underage models
...By his own admission on Howard Stearns Trump liked going in the dressing rooms of Miss Teen pageants because he liked looking at half dressed and naked girls, because he could because he owned the pageant. How would you like to be the father of a teen being treated like that by Trump?
...Trump used to throw parties for his wealthy friends that had models as young as 14 and 15 that were abused by these men. Any sex, consensual or otherwise is illegal and a felony. We know this because one of his wealthy mentors was charged with felony rape of a minor that he plead guilty to for a vastly reduced sentence...and stuff your f**e news crap, these are facts.
Trump has had multiple cases brought surrounding the use of underage girls at parties, and those who give cover for things like this are part of the problem. The things that can't necessarily be proved are well supported by things that can.
There is a lot we do know about Trump, and knowing... (
show quote)
Here's another one of your comments that doesn't merit a reply. You're twice as vile as what you charge Trump yet only half as vile as was Bill Clinton. Maybe there's hope for you yet.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.