One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Dirty Harry Reid tells us why the Senate won't investigate B******i
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 11, 2014 08:55:58   #
wishamako1
 
you are right, Harry Reid sorry to say is too old to hold that position or any other position with the government but then again we have this administration that shouldn't be in power...1/26--1968

Reply
May 11, 2014 09:44:01   #
Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way
 
Nickolai wrote:
I don't think any body is stupid enough to think John Stewart is a news source. John Stewart is a master comic who makes his living making comedy out of absurdity. He is not particular about where he gets his material. It's just a matter of fact that conservatives provide him with enough material (absurdity ) to make a very good living. The main stream media provides legitimate news reporting. Faux News is a news shaping channel. They mix news with opinion, (right wing ) and entertainment. It's called infotainment. And I genuinely feel sorry for Faux Watchers that swallow what Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock feed them and think they are just watching news.
I don't think any body is stupid enough to think J... (show quote)


Niki, I am not supporting h**e mongers, r****ts or homophobes when I say this but if you haven't listened at all to what the experts say Fox News is more balanced than many of those other news outlets.

The difference is Fox covers news items that they feel are important to their demographic of viewers.

And MSNBC's news is how can we ridicule FOX.

Reply
May 11, 2014 09:54:07   #
Blacksheep
 
oldroy wrote:
This man is really something. I can't believe that anyone from the other side of political life sees anything in his words other than politicized crap.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/harry-reid-will-senate-committee-investigate-b******i/?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New+Main+Email

I forgot to call attention to the fact that Harry knows about the ARB and all it did but doesn't seem to know about all the other committees. He does not think that telling Rice to say that it was that video that caused the trouble. I don't think he even thinks.
This man is really something. I can't believe tha... (show quote)



I have it by unimpeachable authority, which I'm not free to reveal, that the B******i attack was done by an elite NRA m*****a led by none other than George W. Bush, himself. He conspired with leaders of the Tea Party to raid the Libyan weapons caches of Omar Gaddafi, that's how they managed to out-gun the defenders of the embassy.

It was Bush who was behind the production of that infamous video short that was used to inflame the Muslims, but what isn't known (until now) is that the demonstrations and r**ts were directed to far cities, and all the security forces went there, leaving the B******i embassy unguarded for Bush and his NRA m*****a to attack.

The motive for this attack was that Ambassador Stevens had made some very unflattering comments about the hash brownies that Bush's wife had sent to the embassy and he wanted revenge.

Our glorious leader President Obama was kept totally in the dark about all this while it was going on or he would certainly have ordered the requested extra security and sent our military in there as soon as possible.

So now you know. The attack on our embassy in B******i was all W. Bush's fault.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2014 10:13:22   #
matnc816
 
Why even bother answering Nicholi? You can't argue with STUPID. How is it this site attracts so many morons? When you are a person who believes the botox riddled brain of Pelosi and the dweeb Reid there is no cure for stupidity.

Reply
May 11, 2014 11:39:37   #
vernon
 
Hemiman wrote:
Breaking news from your MSNBC reporter, Nickolai;It's Bush's fault.! Stay tuned for updates where all things related to the corrupt Obama dictatorship will be "Bush's fault".


:lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 11, 2014 11:44:23   #
vernon
 
Brian Devon wrote:
*********
Nickolai,

Actually the GOP has created a looney-tunes zone with Fox News. When channel surfing, one just needs to skip over the one channel. Makes it easy to just look at the large number of regular channels that actually do have something to say. Fox News serves the same purpose as Pravda served, under the USSR. For those that don't desire "party" news, the options are myriad: CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, Headline News, MSNBC, PBS, BBC and Free Speech TV.



you just answered our question (what is wrong with you)it sticks out like a sore thumb you are a moron

Reply
May 11, 2014 13:25:59   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Nickolai wrote:
It's rare that I ever go to Media Matters and I usually tune in to Faux when something big is in the news just to see what they are up to. I first watched Faux in 2000 and commented with in the first hour that is was a right wing channel But I continued to watch it every night for the next four years. Bill O'reilly. Hannity and Colmes. I don't know why because as time went by my blood pressure kept going up as I got increasingly upset at listening to the swoop noise to breaking news the arrogance and narcissism of Bill O'reilly and the portrayal of Bone head Hannity the staunch all american boy going up against the wimpy liberal Allan Colmes., and all that fair and ballanced we report you decide crap. My wife is who made me stop watching that chanell. I think she just got tired of me watching that crap and getting mad as hell.
It's rare that I ever go to Media Matters and I us... (show quote)


So you watched Fox News for four years after starting in 2000? In other words your wife shut you off from it 10 years ago but you seem to know just what they are saying the past few years. If you aren't allowed to watch them, by your wife, how in hell do you know what they are saying unless you watch MSNBC to get your information about Fox, since you don't read Media Matters online? Do you know quite a lot about their evening schedule these days? I say no but surely you get your info somewhere since you don't read Media Matters. Is it Daily Kos of Think Prog?

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2014 13:33:03   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
B****sheep wrote:
I have it by unimpeachable authority, which I'm not free to reveal, that the B******i attack was done by an elite NRA m*****a led by none other than George W. Bush, himself. He conspired with leaders of the Tea Party to raid the Libyan weapons caches of Omar Gaddafi, that's how they managed to out-gun the defenders of the embassy.

It was Bush who was behind the production of that infamous video short that was used to inflame the Muslims, but what isn't known (until now) is that the demonstrations and r**ts were directed to far cities, and all the security forces went there, leaving the B******i embassy unguarded for Bush and his NRA m*****a to attack.

The motive for this attack was that Ambassador Stevens had made some very unflattering comments about the hash brownies that Bush's wife had sent to the embassy and he wanted revenge.

Our glorious leader President Obama was kept totally in the dark about all this while it was going on or he would certainly have ordered the requested extra security and sent our military in there as soon as possible.

So now you know. The attack on our embassy in B******i was all W. Bush's fault.
I have it by unimpeachable authority, which I'm no... (show quote)


Damn, just think that you have reported this one just as they think about it in the White House and now Trey Gowdy is out to find the real t***h when he could have got it from the White House all along. Of course, he will have to subpoena anyone at the White House to get them to his committee hearings.

Yep, it was Bush's fault and he was trying to help Obama in the 2012 e******n with that little fight. I can't wait for Trey to get started whether the Democrats take part or not. Gowdy is in charge of this one, not Issa through Boehner, which will give it a chance to work.

I wonder if the Democrats will try to get Lije Cummings a good seat on that committee. I don't think he would be much good as he has proved on the Oversight Committee.

Reply
May 11, 2014 14:21:26   #
Nickolai
 
jaydee wrote:
Hey i***t listen up. What part of loosing yourcountry don't you understand. You seem to think it is an offensive thing to call these c*******t jerks out. Their suppose to be accountable to "we the people". Sounds like you didn't pay attention in the ninth grade in civics & history class. In the 1960's we were taught about c*******m. Most of you liberal punks can't even spell c*******m.
These i***ts on public payroll think they are not suppose to be accountable to the people. They get ooooofended when they have to be accountable. They want to be in charge. If they on my payroll they will be accountable to me because I'm in charge, not some corrupt political thug. When Hillary got oooofended before congress that was our(the ones in charge, we then people) cue pay attention. With liberals, the t***h lies in not what you hear, but in what you don't hear. Being accountable entails proving your intent over & over. You don't have the right to be ooooofended. You as a public official & servant to the people are accountable to we the people. That's called performing your duty. When you as an employee on public payroll have a problem with that, it is neglect of duty and a violation of public trust. It is your duty to make sure you perform your duties in such a manner that the public confesses they trust the office of which you hold Cuz you have proven regurally that the people can trust the office that you serve in. That's called responsible lesdership.
Hey i***t listen up. What part of loosing yourcoun... (show quote)





I agree with you we have lost our country and lost our way 40 years ago but you don't seem to understand that. We have been traveling this road ruin for that long. The Benghaaaaaaaaazia thing is a dead horse but your tribe will continue trying it to get all you can get out of it but It's not going anywhere. Far more important is the fact that Condi Rice as National Security had in her possession for several months before
9-11 intelligence that Al qaeda was planning to hijack airlines and ram then into buildings and she or Bush, didn't act on that info. Probably because the neocons in the" New American Century" Cheney and Rumsfeld amoung them needed another Pearl Harbor in order to get the American people behind their plans to take down states that they didn't like and force regime change to those more friendly to US capitalist imperialism

Reply
May 11, 2014 14:34:41   #
Nickolai
 
oldroy wrote:
So you watched Fox News for four years after starting in 2000? In other words your wife shut you off from it 10 years ago but you seem to know just what they are saying the past few years. If you aren't allowed to watch them, by your wife, how in hell do you know what they are saying unless you watch MSNBC to get your information about Fox, since you don't read Media Matters online? Do you know quite a lot about their evening schedule these days? I say no but surely you get your info somewhere since you don't read Media Matters. Is it Daily Kos of Think Prog?
So you watched Fox News for four years after start... (show quote)





I have my own room and TV and I surf. I've watched Huckabee with guest history revisionist David Barton founder of Wallbuilders on attempting to smash the separation between church and state and other of his shows. I catch Hannity far too often because I can only watch for a bit before I feel like up chucking. And I catch video clips of O'Reilly. on Crooks and liars., Huffington Post, The Daily Show and the Colbert Report. So I get more Fox than I can stand. Matter of fact I just finnished watching Fox News on Sunday with Cris Wallace.


When I tune in O'reily I only watch his talking points to get an idea about his latest rant like his phoney war on Christmas he trots out every year just like clock work

Reply
May 11, 2014 14:49:46   #
dennisimoto Loc: Washington State (West)
 
Actually, the problem with blame stream media is not what they report. It's what they DON't report. e.g. the only news van in the parking lot at the Cliven Bundy standoff was FOX's. I guess the others all had drones up or something. Saddest of all is that FOX is the only station that comes close to presenting the unbiased t***h. It should be ALL of them but the rest are all in the hip pockets of Liberalism and the t***h is just not in them.

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2014 15:03:39   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
Nickolai wrote:
From this Wednesday's Your World with Neil Cavuto, Faux "news" continues their Benghaaaaaaaazi Derangement Syndrome, and brings on former Sec. of Defense and war criminal Donald Rumsfeld to attack Hillary Clinton by taking her words out of context, as we've seen all of them do on Fox time and time again.

It seems Rumsfeld is now suddenly concerned about four Americans dying. Rather than ask him about the number of Americans that died on his watch after we were lied into invading a country that wasn't a threat to us, Cavuto gave him a chance to attack the Democrats -- who are calling this partisan witch hunt out for being just that -- and for a bit of historical revisionism on Iraq instead.

This channel just continues to turn into a really bad parody of itself every single day.

The Republicans are hoping if they keep up the drum beat over Benghaaaaaaazi it will help them keep the house and win the Senate. They plan to keep it up for another one and a half years in hopes it will destrroy Hillary and give Jeb a big boost. They don't realize that they are only playing to their own chior
From this Wednesday's Your World with Neil Cavuto,... (show quote)


You keep shooting your mouth off about Fox News. So why do you watch it? If you can't stand the heat in the kitchen, get the hell out of it. And if you think that calling this a partisan witch hunt, to find out just what went wrong in
B******i, you are, again, wrong. So tells us all genius, after all this time, well over a year. With all of your so called investigations. Why has no one been held accountable? Why has no one came up with an answer to what went wrong? You cry Foul because you say this is a partisan witch hunt. Really? What do you call all that bull crap that went on from the White House? OK by you, for the dummiecrats to be partisan, and you don't say a word.
You are so two faced. Why is it, not one person came to the aid of these 4 Americans. Think about this you fool. We have Black Opps, We have Delta Force, we have the Navy
Seals, We have Scramble jets, ready and waiting all over this world, and not one, was called upon to render aid. We have troops on stand by, dam near in every major country on the globe, and with all that and more, your dumb ass leader and his Secretary of State H. Clinton, couldn't bother to pick up a phone and tell some body, to help
these 4 brave men. Why are we spending hundreds of millions of our tax payer dollars on having these troops, if not to use them for just these kind of situations? And your fool President goes to bed to be ready for a hard days camping to keep his job. I think you have lost your frigging mind.
RETW

Reply
May 11, 2014 15:08:42   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Nickolai wrote:
I have my own room and TV and I surf. I've watched Huckabee with guest history revisionist David Barton founder of Wallbuilders on attempting to smash the separation between church and state and other of his shows. I catch Hannity far too often because I can only watch for a bit before I feel like up chucking. And I catch video clips of O'Reilly. on Crooks and liars., Huffington Post, The Daily Show and the Colbert Report. So I get more Fox than I can stand. Matter of fact I just finnished watching Fox News on Sunday with Cris Wallace.


When I tune in O'reily I only watch his talking points to get an idea about his latest rant like his phoney war on Christmas he trots out every year just like clock work
I have my own room and TV and I surf. I've watch... (show quote)


When confronted with the crimes of Osatan and co.always change the subject.Shift the topic to Bush or fox.

Reply
May 11, 2014 15:52:48   #
ibKelly
 
B****sheep wrote:
I have it by unimpeachable authority, which I'm not free to reveal, that the B******i attack was done by an elite NRA m*****a led by none other than George W. Bush, himself. He conspired with leaders of the Tea Party to raid the Libyan weapons caches of Omar Gaddafi, that's how they managed to out-gun the defenders of the embassy.

It was Bush who was behind the production of that infamous video short that was used to inflame the Muslims, but what isn't known (until now) is that the demonstrations and r**ts were directed to far cities, and all the security forces went there, leaving the B******i embassy unguarded for Bush and his NRA m*****a to attack.

The motive for this attack was that Ambassador Stevens had made some very unflattering comments about the hash brownies that Bush's wife had sent to the embassy and he wanted revenge.

Our glorious leader President Obama was kept totally in the dark about all this while it was going on or he would certainly have ordered the requested extra security and sent our military in there as soon as possible.

So now you know. The attack on our embassy in B******i was all W. Bush's fault.
I have it by unimpeachable authority, which I'm no... (show quote)



Some of us follow the t***hs as written by others.... sorry to say the rest follow Obama's t***hs....

Reply
May 11, 2014 16:00:02   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Nickolai wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup:


have you or Brian ever had an intelligent thought? if so why don't you write it down some time?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.