The Real Question...If Trump Told Cohen To Lie Should He Be Impeached Or Resign? All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar, Hillary is a worse liar...wh**ever... If proof is...

woodguru

All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar, Hillary is a worse liar...wh**ever...

If proof is shown that he in fact did tell Cohen to lie, should he be gone, is it enough?

The reason I ask that is that the next line of defense will be, okay, so it looks like he did that, is it enough to get rid of this president who is doing such wonderful things? Of course the right will go there.

As a person who identifies with the right are you prepared to uphold the law. or continue with goofy defenses for a president who has repeatedly broken the law. And by definition lying to the public is breaking the law, telling someone to lie to congress about something he was lying about as well is breaking the law, and they were lying about something that was breaking the law itself, (doing a deal with Russians). And yes, contrary to FOX rhetoric, even private american businessmen cannot do financial deals with Russian oligarchs.

I do think a certain number of Trump supporters will peel off and support the law if he broke it, I'm just curious what that landscape looks like.

Lonewolf

woodguru wrote:

All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar... (show quote)

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

woodguru wrote:

All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar... (show quote)

You maniacs have cried wolf so often we no longer believe anything you say. However, considering the passes you have given everyone in the Obama criminal administration, and considering the good Trump is fighting for America, in spite of your Marxist opposition, yes, I would give Trump a pass on some things. On the other hand if you try and railroad him I would like to be able to join an armed throng marching on Washington.

Lonewolf

padremike wrote:

You maniacs have cried wolf so often we no longer believe anything you say. However, considering the passes you have given everyone in the Obama criminal administration, and considering the good Trump is fighting for America, in spite of your Marxist opposition, yes, I would give Trump a pass on some things. On the other hand if you try and railroad him I would like to be able to join an armed throng marching on Washington.

its kind of cold to be marching in a thong

archie bunker Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar... (show quote)

IF...IF....IF....What is it with you people, and "IF"?

If all of my Aunts were men, would they be my Uncles?
Give "IF" a break!

Liberty Tree

archie bunker wrote:

IF...IF....IF....What is it with you people, and "IF"?

If all of my Aunts were men, would they be my Uncles?
Give "IF" a break!

When you have no proof you have to rely on "if".

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

woodguru wrote:

All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar... (show quote)

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Lonewolf wrote:

its kind of cold to be marching in a thong

That might be true for metro sexual, chardonnay sipping girlie boy Progressives but not for traditional toxic masculine and battle hardened Conservative men. Our gals can whip your best men and our girls are in high heels.

woodguru

padremike wrote:

You maniacs have cried wolf so often we no longer believe anything you say. However, considering the passes you have given everyone in the Obama criminal administration, and considering the good Trump is fighting for America, in spite of your Marxist opposition, yes, I would give Trump a pass on some things. On the other hand if you try and railroad him I would like to be able to join an armed throng marching on Washington.

We are talking about proof of wrongdoing, not "railroading". Do not mix the ideas of free passes because of all the good he's done with being railroaded when he's fairly caught with the goods.

When it comes to the law, and the thing Trump has done, unfortunately wh**ever Obama or Hillary did does not count for a free pass on the Donald. You can't be about the rule of law in any sense if you start handing out free passes because of what a predecessor did that they did not get caught and charged with.

I'm for getting rid of that armed throng that doesn't have any regard for the law or constitution.

If Obama had been indicted or impeached for anything he was caught doing dems would not have responded with an uprising to protect their criminal.

Anyone talking about crap like free passes because of the good he's done needs to stop paying lip service to being about the constitution and law. The constitution does not make provisions for presidents being held accountable unless they have really done good. He could be Jesus Christ and if he lies to the public or obstructs justice he would need to be impeached.

woodguru

padremike wrote:

...and our girls are in high heels.

And so are some of your politicians who seem to like d**g costumes. Farenthold and Giuliani comes to mind there. I'd post the pictures but nobody needs that crap imprinted on their brain.

woodguru

archie bunker wrote:

IF...IF....IF....What is it with you people, and "IF"?

If all of my Aunts were men, would they be my Uncles?
Give "IF" a break!

I say if because the evidence is actually there already, it's just that the right is going to have to be beat about the head and shoulders with even more proof, and I'm not sure any level of proof will do it for some.

If is a word that takes too much imagination for people who's brain doesn't work like that or process new facts outside of already held beliefs.

woodguru

archie bunker wrote:

IF...IF....IF....What is it with you people, and "IF"?

If all of my Aunts were men, would they be my Uncles?
Give "IF" a break!

If is a legitimate precursor to accepting facts, it makes sense that people who don't know what facts are would have a difficult time with the concept.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

woodguru wrote:

All the lip service aside about Cohen being a liar... (show quote)

Unless you are under oath in a court of law, lying isn't a crime. Ask any salesman. You have to read the fine print yourself.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

If is a legitimate precursor to accepting facts, it makes sense that people who don't know what facts are would have a difficult time with the concept.

You're funny!😂

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

woodguru wrote:

We are talking about proof of wrongdoing, not &quo... (show quote)

1. You have no proof of Trump wrongdoing but, no matter, you've already assassinated him.
2. You care only about the rule of law when you are able to twist or ignore it for your own vile purposes.
3. That armed Throng is consistent with the 2nd Amendment and don't ever forget about it. It's designed for those who would fundamentally change our country.
4. Obama's attorney Generals were both crooked and protected his criminal organization. You birds supported their criminal and subversive activities therefore, you could never see any of their wrongdoings.
5. And finally, as expected, you use sacrilege to emphasize a non valid point.