Jack the Rhetor from Squim WA:
Since you can’t stay on the track of the thread and since you want to push your ‘dems legislate from the bench’ issue here is a suggestion that would give you a chance to demonstrate the validity of your claim as well as be helpful to us on OPP:
1) Start a new thread on your legislating from the bench’ topic.
2) Give to us folks who don’t read court documents the following data on ALL of the court cases that involve trump, trump associates (Manafort, Gates, Cohen, etc), Russian oligarchs and Russian agents [ala Mueller’s and Southern New York District cases], emoluments, border, immigration, etc) in ALL Federal, and state courts---Washington DC, Washington state, Eastern VA, Southern NY, etc., NY and other state and local courts (not just your hobbyhorse 9th circuit):
a) Court ID
b) Docket #
c) Defendant/Prosecutor
d) Judge’s name
e) the President who appointed that judge (if a federal judge)
f) Judge’s party affiliation (if known)
g) Result of the case (if finished); the status if not finished
h) Your comments—here is a place for you to spin and promote your propaganda
This will give you a wonderful pulpit for your legislating from the bench dogma and provide OPP readers with data. Perhaps w will see if the courts are biased against trump and if, in fact, the there is legislation from the bench.
Wait! There’s more! If you have extra time, you could go back and provide the same court data for the trump cases before the e******n: trump university, the suit with his
3500 suits (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump) .We know that is a lot of research, but you read these court documents and have the data at hand, no doubt. You could put all this together into a biased book that I am sure the right would be happy to buy—making you rich and happy. Great idea? Sure—no thanks needed, always happy to help an OPP colleague.
Jack the Rhetor from Squim WA: br Since you can’t... (