One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
OPP Poll....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11 next>>
Jan 9, 2019 09:54:12   #
bahmer (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
I have found your problem. YOU interpret the constition while the rest of us understand the Constitution.


Amen and Amen that is all of the democrats problem not just lonewolf.

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 10:44:39   #
snowbear37
 
Rose42 wrote:
What she wants is irrelevant if her illness prevents her from fully doing her job. If it does then she should retire.




Exactly!!

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 10:48:00   #
snowbear37
 
woodguru wrote:
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn't "favor" either side, but adhered to the law and constitution?

The only acceptable nominations need to have a solid history of centrist legal positions regardless of their party affiliation. The supreme court if done properly demands no bias, not an "our side" mentality.

The left would support any centrist judge, the right demands the full on hard right conservative that has a proven track record of being perfectly willing to bring their conservative political and religious beliefs and ideology to the court.
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn... (show quote)


B.S.!!

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:21:22   #
kemmer (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
Should Ruth Bader Ginsburg retire???

NO!

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:37:51   #
Owl32 (a regular here)
 
Yes, she should retire.

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:40:21   #
zillaorange (a regular here)
 
kemmer wrote:
NO!


If she can't stay awake while she's supposed to be working, SHE GOTTA GO !!!

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:50:39   #
TrueAmerican (a regular here)
 
proud republican wrote:
Should Ruth Bader Ginsburg retire???


YES

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:51:13   #
Nickolai
 
proud republican wrote:
Should Ruth Bader Ginsburg retire???






No not until it's her desire to do so

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:52:05   #
TrueAmerican (a regular here)
 
Kevyn wrote:
Yes as soon as she wants to and there is a Democrat in the White House. Hers is a lifetime appointment.


You are to funny HA HA HA HA HA HA

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:53:59   #
Nickolai
 
proud republican wrote:
Lone....Thats the difference between Conservative Judges and Liberal Judges...Conservatives are Constitutionalists and Liberal Judges are NOT!!!1







Conservatives are as worthless as tits on a boar hog

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:56:25   #
Nickolai
 
JFlorio wrote:
Yea, like Ginsburg has not done her entire life. Never had to wonder which way she’d vote on anything.







Yes she always votes the right way just as Anton Scalia always voted the wrong way. The brains of conservatives are wired bassakwards

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:57:31   #
kemmer (a regular here)
 
Nickolai wrote:
Yes she always votes the right way just as Anton Scalia always voted the wrong way. The brains of conservatives are wired bassakwards



| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 11:58:21   #
Nickolai
 
EmilyD wrote:
And here's what's wrong with your comment - Ginsburg made anti-Trump comments and then apologized for them. How is that for a supposedly "unbiased" Supreme Court Justice: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-for-anti-trump-comments/








No body is unbiased every one leans one way or the other even independents

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 12:00:22   #
Nickolai
 
no propaganda please wrote:
She is not unbiased, she has stated many times that the Constitution is a living document and needs to be reinterpreted to suit the times and the people involved. The Constitution is changeable by amendment not what ever suites any one who chooses to reinterpret it to suit their politics. Trump would put in another originalist, that is someone who would not reinterpret the Constitution to suit their needs.




Amendment's are not easy nor can they solve a problem quickly passing amends are not the solution for every problem

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 12:01:49   #
Nickolai
 
woodguru wrote:
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn't "favor" either side, but adhered to the law and constitution?

The only acceptable nominations need to have a solid history of centrist legal positions regardless of their party affiliation. The supreme court if done properly demands no bias, not an "our side" mentality.

The left would support any centrist judge, the right demands the full on hard right conservative that has a proven track record of being perfectly willing to bring their conservative political and religious beliefs and ideology to the court.
What would be wrong with a supreme court that didn... (show quote)







very good

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.