One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A Brand New Word
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 3, 2019 17:06:09   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
ByBEN SHAPIRO
@BENSHAPIRO
January 2, 2019
2018 was a chaotic year. It was a chaotic year for the markets, for domestic and international politics, and for social mores. 2019 promises more of the same, if the end of the prior year was any indicator. And it promises something else: the continued rise of the Wokescolds.

Wokescolds are the new representatives of moral panic. We've seen plenty of moral panic before in the United States, from worries about violent video games, to concern about allegations of sex abuse at day care facilities. But never have we seen a moral panic of the stunning breadth of today's woke moral panic. It's a moral panic that insists we change fundamental characteristics of our society, from biology, to language, to politics, to religion, to romantic relations, to art, to comedy.

We're told that if we fail to rewrite biology to suggest there are more than two sexes, or if we don't use preferred pronouns rather than biological ones, we will inevitably create emotional and mental instability among certain vulnerable groups. We're told that if we fail to silence members of groups who haven't suffered sufficiently in the United States, we will be contributing to the perpetuation of power hierarchies that target minorities. We're told that if we don't force religious people to violate their own standards in order to cater to those engaging in what they consider to be sinful activity, we will be bolstering religious oppression. We're told that the only proper type of sexual relationship is one initiated via contractual levels of affirmative consent, rather than mere affirmative body language or acquiescence. We're told that "Baby, It's Cold Outside" and "The Philadelphia Story" are deeply troubling hallmarks of our sexist past (modern rap, replete with brutal degradation of women, is just fine, in case you were wondering). And we're told that if we consider politically incorrect jokes funny, we're strengthening regressive stereotypes.

If we fail to abide by these new strictures, we will be attacked by the Wokescolds. These "woke" inquisitors have apparently mastered the ever-shifting dynamics of l*****t power politics and are willing to scour everyone's online history and interpersonal relationships for signs of heresy. Once such heresy is uncovered, the Wokescolds truly go to work: They demand apologies from the supposed sinners and boycotts of those who refuse to disassociate from them. They discourage decent people from speaking up — better to stay silent so as to avoid the wrath of the Wokescolds.

The Wokescolds deliberately pick marginal cases — cases on which good people may be split. This allows the Wokescolds to consistently narrow the boundaries of safety for those who disagree with them.

The latest victim of the Wokescolds: Louis C.K. Now, C.K. has a reprehensible personal history; by his own admission, he used his position of fame and power to lure up-and-coming female comedians backstage, where he would then ask them to watch him touch himself. C.K. has apologized for that behavior. But now he's back on the road, and he's beginning to make jokes again.

This must not be allowed, particularly when his jokes are about such taboo topics as g****r pronouns and the alleged expertise conferred by experiencing tragedy. And so C.K. has been pronounced Unwoke. See, before his #MeToo moment, he was sufficiently politically l*****t to avoid the Wokescold wrath — after all, he once called Sarah Palin a "c—-." But now, C.K. must pay the price for not being sufficiently woke. Those who watch his comedy must be shamed. And we must suggest that he is no longer Funny.

Now, the difference between being funny and being Funny is that when you're funny, everyone knows it — when you're Funny, as defined by critics, you don't have to be funny. You just have to be woke, like the awfully unfunny Hannah Gadsby. Real humor requires only satisfying the Wokescolds. We've all just been misdefining comedy for a few millennia.

If all this sounds dull, obnoxious and frustrating, that's because it is. And while the Wokescolds may win temporary victories, those victories will surely be Pyrrhic: As it turns out, we tend to like our biology, language, politics, religion, romantic relationships, art and comedy. The Wokescolds will certainly lose. But not before they destroy a lot of people and fray the social fabric nearly beyond repair.

Reply
Jan 3, 2019 17:13:39   #
bahmer
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
ByBEN SHAPIRO
@BENSHAPIRO
January 2, 2019
2018 was a chaotic year. It was a chaotic year for the markets, for domestic and international politics, and for social mores. 2019 promises more of the same, if the end of the prior year was any indicator. And it promises something else: the continued rise of the Wokescolds.

Wokescolds are the new representatives of moral panic. We've seen plenty of moral panic before in the United States, from worries about violent video games, to concern about allegations of sex abuse at day care facilities. But never have we seen a moral panic of the stunning breadth of today's woke moral panic. It's a moral panic that insists we change fundamental characteristics of our society, from biology, to language, to politics, to religion, to romantic relations, to art, to comedy.

We're told that if we fail to rewrite biology to suggest there are more than two sexes, or if we don't use preferred pronouns rather than biological ones, we will inevitably create emotional and mental instability among certain vulnerable groups. We're told that if we fail to silence members of groups who haven't suffered sufficiently in the United States, we will be contributing to the perpetuation of power hierarchies that target minorities. We're told that if we don't force religious people to violate their own standards in order to cater to those engaging in what they consider to be sinful activity, we will be bolstering religious oppression. We're told that the only proper type of sexual relationship is one initiated via contractual levels of affirmative consent, rather than mere affirmative body language or acquiescence. We're told that "Baby, It's Cold Outside" and "The Philadelphia Story" are deeply troubling hallmarks of our sexist past (modern rap, replete with brutal degradation of women, is just fine, in case you were wondering). And we're told that if we consider politically incorrect jokes funny, we're strengthening regressive stereotypes.

If we fail to abide by these new strictures, we will be attacked by the Wokescolds. These "woke" inquisitors have apparently mastered the ever-shifting dynamics of l*****t power politics and are willing to scour everyone's online history and interpersonal relationships for signs of heresy. Once such heresy is uncovered, the Wokescolds truly go to work: They demand apologies from the supposed sinners and boycotts of those who refuse to disassociate from them. They discourage decent people from speaking up — better to stay silent so as to avoid the wrath of the Wokescolds.

The Wokescolds deliberately pick marginal cases — cases on which good people may be split. This allows the Wokescolds to consistently narrow the boundaries of safety for those who disagree with them.

The latest victim of the Wokescolds: Louis C.K. Now, C.K. has a reprehensible personal history; by his own admission, he used his position of fame and power to lure up-and-coming female comedians backstage, where he would then ask them to watch him touch himself. C.K. has apologized for that behavior. But now he's back on the road, and he's beginning to make jokes again.

This must not be allowed, particularly when his jokes are about such taboo topics as g****r pronouns and the alleged expertise conferred by experiencing tragedy. And so C.K. has been pronounced Unwoke. See, before his #MeToo moment, he was sufficiently politically l*****t to avoid the Wokescold wrath — after all, he once called Sarah Palin a "c—-." But now, C.K. must pay the price for not being sufficiently woke. Those who watch his comedy must be shamed. And we must suggest that he is no longer Funny.

Now, the difference between being funny and being Funny is that when you're funny, everyone knows it — when you're Funny, as defined by critics, you don't have to be funny. You just have to be woke, like the awfully unfunny Hannah Gadsby. Real humor requires only satisfying the Wokescolds. We've all just been misdefining comedy for a few millennia.

If all this sounds dull, obnoxious and frustrating, that's because it is. And while the Wokescolds may win temporary victories, those victories will surely be Pyrrhic: As it turns out, we tend to like our biology, language, politics, religion, romantic relationships, art and comedy. The Wokescolds will certainly lose. But not before they destroy a lot of people and fray the social fabric nearly beyond repair.
ByBEN SHAPIRO br @BENSHAPIRO br January 2, 2019 br... (show quote)


Amen and Amen good post thanks for this one.

Reply
Jan 3, 2019 17:17:41   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
bahmer wrote:
Amen and Amen good post thanks for this one.



Reply
 
 
Jan 3, 2019 17:20:19   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
It was like you were writing a mental image of me , that third paragraph...

I think I will avoid this Awakening...
Going through life 'eyes wide shut' will just have to be enough...
So few of the new-age comedians are actually funny... Now "The Champ" could always getva chuckle out of me....

Reply
Jan 3, 2019 19:09:09   #
debeda
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
ByBEN SHAPIRO
@BENSHAPIRO
January 2, 2019
2018 was a chaotic year. It was a chaotic year for the markets, for domestic and international politics, and for social mores. 2019 promises more of the same, if the end of the prior year was any indicator. And it promises something else: the continued rise of the Wokescolds.

Wokescolds are the new representatives of moral panic. We've seen plenty of moral panic before in the United States, from worries about violent video games, to concern about allegations of sex abuse at day care facilities. But never have we seen a moral panic of the stunning breadth of today's woke moral panic. It's a moral panic that insists we change fundamental characteristics of our society, from biology, to language, to politics, to religion, to romantic relations, to art, to comedy.

We're told that if we fail to rewrite biology to suggest there are more than two sexes, or if we don't use preferred pronouns rather than biological ones, we will inevitably create emotional and mental instability among certain vulnerable groups. We're told that if we fail to silence members of groups who haven't suffered sufficiently in the United States, we will be contributing to the perpetuation of power hierarchies that target minorities. We're told that if we don't force religious people to violate their own standards in order to cater to those engaging in what they consider to be sinful activity, we will be bolstering religious oppression. We're told that the only proper type of sexual relationship is one initiated via contractual levels of affirmative consent, rather than mere affirmative body language or acquiescence. We're told that "Baby, It's Cold Outside" and "The Philadelphia Story" are deeply troubling hallmarks of our sexist past (modern rap, replete with brutal degradation of women, is just fine, in case you were wondering). And we're told that if we consider politically incorrect jokes funny, we're strengthening regressive stereotypes.

If we fail to abide by these new strictures, we will be attacked by the Wokescolds. These "woke" inquisitors have apparently mastered the ever-shifting dynamics of l*****t power politics and are willing to scour everyone's online history and interpersonal relationships for signs of heresy. Once such heresy is uncovered, the Wokescolds truly go to work: They demand apologies from the supposed sinners and boycotts of those who refuse to disassociate from them. They discourage decent people from speaking up — better to stay silent so as to avoid the wrath of the Wokescolds.

The Wokescolds deliberately pick marginal cases — cases on which good people may be split. This allows the Wokescolds to consistently narrow the boundaries of safety for those who disagree with them.

The latest victim of the Wokescolds: Louis C.K. Now, C.K. has a reprehensible personal history; by his own admission, he used his position of fame and power to lure up-and-coming female comedians backstage, where he would then ask them to watch him touch himself. C.K. has apologized for that behavior. But now he's back on the road, and he's beginning to make jokes again.

This must not be allowed, particularly when his jokes are about such taboo topics as g****r pronouns and the alleged expertise conferred by experiencing tragedy. And so C.K. has been pronounced Unwoke. See, before his #MeToo moment, he was sufficiently politically l*****t to avoid the Wokescold wrath — after all, he once called Sarah Palin a "c—-." But now, C.K. must pay the price for not being sufficiently woke. Those who watch his comedy must be shamed. And we must suggest that he is no longer Funny.

Now, the difference between being funny and being Funny is that when you're funny, everyone knows it — when you're Funny, as defined by critics, you don't have to be funny. You just have to be woke, like the awfully unfunny Hannah Gadsby. Real humor requires only satisfying the Wokescolds. We've all just been misdefining comedy for a few millennia.

If all this sounds dull, obnoxious and frustrating, that's because it is. And while the Wokescolds may win temporary victories, those victories will surely be Pyrrhic: As it turns out, we tend to like our biology, language, politics, religion, romantic relationships, art and comedy. The Wokescolds will certainly lose. But not before they destroy a lot of people and fray the social fabric nearly beyond repair.
ByBEN SHAPIRO br @BENSHAPIRO br January 2, 2019 br... (show quote)


GREAT article, thanks for sharing. Hey, ie thought of some comedy!! You know how A****a uses those bullhorn and airhorns? Conservatives should get old school boom boxes and play laugh tracks wherever A****a goes! THAT would be quite amusing

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 11:52:29   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
It was like you were writing a mental image of me , that third paragraph...

I think I will avoid this Awakening...
Going through life 'eyes wide shut' will just have to be enough...
So few of the new-age comedians are actually funny... Now "The Champ" could always getva chuckle out of me....


todays comedians
use vulgar references to get their audience to laugh and most of the laughter is self embarrassment
vulgarity is not-definitely not amusing--in this humble opinion it's extremely d********g
looking back aways we had true commedians
Bob Hope
Jack Benny
Red Skelton
George Burns, to name a few

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 11:59:35   #
Rose42
 
That was a good article thanks.

I agree on the state of today's comedy. Most of it isn't funny - its vulgar and profane.

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2019 13:13:30   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
badbobby wrote:
todays comedians
use vulgar references to get their audience to laugh and most of the laughter is self embarrassment
vulgarity is not-definitely not amusing--in this humble opinion it's extremely d********g
looking back aways we had true commedians
Bob Hope
Jack Benny
Red Skelton
George Burns, to name a few


Agreed and agreed

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 14:19:25   #
bahmer
 
badbobby wrote:
todays comedians
use vulgar references to get their audience to laugh and most of the laughter is self embarrassment
vulgarity is not-definitely not amusing--in this humble opinion it's extremely d********g
looking back aways we had true commedians
Bob Hope
Jack Benny
Red Skelton
George Burns, to name a few


Amen and Amen they were all great and the kids could listen as well.

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 17:00:32   #
Bcon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Agreed and agreed


When ever I am flipping channels looking for something worth watching, and I come across these so called stand up comedians, I opt out because when I did stop to see
Some of the so called comedy, every one of the so called comedians could not get through even part of a skit without using the most obnoxious swear words available. There is no real comedy any more.

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 18:59:06   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Bcon wrote:
When ever I am flipping channels looking for something worth watching, and I come across these so called stand up comedians, I opt out because when I did stop to see
Some of the so called comedy, every one of the so called comedians could not get through even part of a skit without using the most obnoxious swear words available. There is no real comedy any more.


And I read studies on how the younger generation has higher IQs...
God gives, God takes...

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2019 20:18:12   #
debeda
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
And I read studies on how the younger generation has higher IQs...
God gives, God takes...


I find that VERY hard to believe. I think the tests have been adjusted to eradicate their r****t basis

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 20:34:53   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
debeda wrote:
I find that VERY hard to believe. I think the tests have been adjusted to eradicate their r****t basis


I don't know...
Sure seems that kids are moving at a faster pace than I ever did...
Have a nephew of seven who can do wonders on computers and ipads and whatnot but can't sit still enough to catch a fish...
Different kind of IQs perhaps...

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 20:44:39   #
Bcon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I don't know...
Sure seems that kids are moving at a faster pace than I ever did...
Have a nephew of seven who can do wonders on computers and ipads and whatnot but can't sit still enough to catch a fish...
Different kind of IQs perhaps...


I think we have here apples and oranges. What has a young child’s IQ have to do with the vulgarity of every comedian. It is great to see them start out strong, but why put sprigs in their development with sick so called comedians?

Reply
Jan 4, 2019 20:50:35   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Bcon wrote:
I think we have here apples and oranges. What has a young child’s IQ have to do with the vulgarity of every comedian. It is great to see them start out strong, but why put sprigs in their development with sick so called comedians?


I was being ironic...
Higher IQ's apparently equal to a baser sense of humor...
Children certainly don't have the role models I had growing up....

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.