Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I believe you are correct as well...
Subsidized housing serves a valuable purpose but should not be open to those capable of providing for themselves...
From what I have read so far Carson's proposal would act as an incentive for those who are capable to provide more for themselves... Something I believe most strongly in...
What the left leaning "journalists" and politicans somehow neglect to mention is the considerable number of able bodied men and women who are collecting disability checks from Social Security along with cost of living stipends from their respective states for non-existent disabilities, or what amount to manageable disorders passed off as disabilities.
I could take you for a walk through San Francisco, Venice or Santa Monica, for example, and you would see droves of them, spending their days getting high on weed or using meth, and once they've spent the taxpayers' money in short order on their drug of choice, panhandling or stealing to obtain more funds.
Many of them eventually end up in subsidized housing.
We're talking people in their late teens, twenties and thirties, victims as much of a socialist system as they are of their own laziness or stupidity, because the system allows them to skate on the taxpayers' dime, complicit with so- called "professionals" who diagnose them as disabled and/ or sleazy lawyers who assist them in beating the system.
The younger ones call themselves "dirty kids," and will literally look at you like you're crazy if you even suggest they find some sort of work.
Then there are minority members whose entire upbringings, often in fatherless "homes" on welfare in housing projects, who, thanks to the Democratic Party, see living off the taxpayer as a respectable mode of life, again, most of whom could be working.
Ben Carson's idea makes a lot of sense, something needs to be done to light a fire under these people to make them self sufficient and, through eventual full reentry (or entry, period) into the marketplace, up to an income level where they can live on the fruits of their own efforts.
It's long been my belief that the Democrats' push to allow as many i******s into the country as possible is in part based on their intention to deprive those Americans mentioned above of available unsk**led jobs in order to keep them on the public dole, especially b****s, who they have long seen as a mainstay v****g collective (keeping their neighborhood schools failures at educating, keeping them in fatherless homes, keeping them believing "Republicans want to take everything away from you, Democrats love you and want to 'help' you.")
As far as the white young people mentioned above are concerned, the chaos, filth, excrement and other detritus on public streets or at many subsidized housing sites seems, for some unfathomable reason, to be part and parcel of most "progressive" run cities.
None of these people manage to find themselves mentioned in any of the Democrats' dialogue when discussing subjects such as Ben Carson's proposal, yet they do constitute a considerable number of the people involved.