Pennylynn,
My safe-room,
Is not to have further discussions with particular people who you defend and support.
I didn't cast the first stone, . . . so get your facts correct here and stop denying and deflecting the t***h.
With your particular personal biasses that many have posed as a severe inability, to listen to one another's viewpoints.
And then taking on the (sensationalism,) by allowing others to attacking another belief, and then doing nothing for six months.
Pennylynn, Those are the facts, if you haven't received my Private Message already.
So stew on those facts, . . .
You didn't change your opinion of me three years ago plus, . . .
When I probably predicted this outcome with you and your inability to handle the present situation and salacious public responses to me.
Just look at your response to me in your two replies in this thread which you can't distinguish from facts or fiction.
Then and your present day FRS forum debacle. What would your papa say now to the present day facts presented ?
It's all your doing, take responsibility, ownership and blame . . . It's all yours . . .
I don't play games, and am not your games, my personal suggestion is stop it, . . . and grow up and not being a self-centered person.
It's only a suggestion because, I h**e to be balamed in other people's dirty laundry.
A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-37830-1.html"Internetting Trolls :
a. Sea-Lioning Troll's, Self-Appointed "Good Cop"
b. Concern Troll's, Pseudo-Displays of "Constructive Criticism"
c. Gish Galloping Troll's, Falsehoods nitpicking arguments unrelated details
d. Impersonation Troll's, create h**x impersonation accounts in your name
e. Dog-Piling Troll's, Online silencing, Cyber Mob to discredit a target
g. Gas-Lighting Troll's, Giving false information to cause self-doubt.
Pennylynn, moving onto the article at hand. "Here’s a Defense of the Traditional Date for Christmas . . . December 25."
Don't you find this article even remotely intriguing ?
The article is word for word, by Dr. Taylor Marshall.
My reply is a mostly a cut and paste response. ? to make it more simplistic, I still don't understand your rational argument opinion?
Pennylynn,
Question you read it mostly ? Please stop being disingenuous.
Concentration on the article issues ? Or do you have an inability to reply, because of your education and religious theology ?
Nobody is trying lecturing anybody here Pennylynn.
Here is a question, or do you just have a pre-disposition of anti-Catholic biasses ?
In your inability to his approach or to react or respond to Dr. Marshalls article ?
Pennylynn,
I just have a differences of perspective and take on Religion, history, people and their personal motives.
Which are the Facts, T***h and Wisdom . . . to accept facts and knowledge.
My Papa was my mentor,
He raised 14 children, he lost both his parents at a young age of five before the depression era.
He rose through the enlisted ranks in War World II, and was decorated with the Bronze Star and numerous Army citation's.
He became an officer the top in his class of 100 in Massachusetts Boston Latin, and had a 38 year military service, retiring as a General in the US Army and Massachusetts Army National guard.
I took care of both of my Parents before their deaths and had many detailed conversations with them.
Yeah Pennylynn,
My Father taught me that you can do anything, in your mind, body, soul and with the blessings of Jesus Christ, the Father and the Holy Spirit.
The only limiting factor my Father-Dad taught me, is the people that respond with the word, . . . "NO in a discussion or conversation."
Reflect on that . . .
And reflect on the Bible narratives and the simplistic question, human conception date?
And the human gestation period? And the ability just do the simple math . . . found in the Bible
God the Father and the Holy Spirit is the cause of this beautiful wonderful miraculous event and of birth of the absolute greatest person alive, Jesus Christ.
A man and a God that changed world history, Theology, and Philosophy of people, and our faithfulness to his words and instructions to His church for 1,987 years.
"To be deep in history, is to cease being Protestant, and quite possibly Judaism."
Cardinal John Henry Newman, Anglican 19th century theologian convert to Catholicism.
Pennylynn,
All that is presented is a biblical timeline? And a human timeline? Conception time-line and birth a 40 week gestation period.
And deducing accurately by using that to predict the Birth of Jesus, which is found in the Bible New Testament.
Imagine that,
Where Theologians, Philosophers, Historians to this present day.
So for 1,987 years these Educated-Thinkers could not even fathom this simplistic article. Defense of the Traditional Date for Christmas . . . December 25
And you say this is too complicated for anyone to understand.
What a sham what a false reply . . .
I have a human Health Biology Medical degree;
With 20 years worth history in the medical field, a degree in telecommunications and in Motion Film Production field and a 15 years work history, and a degree in Occupational Safety and Industrial Hygiene work related 5 years history.
Among countless jobs that I've worked in, so please don't give me that Education malarkey, . . . and blowing your holy smoke education attitude.
Pennylynn
So you think your superior in knowledge and with university degrees, than the rest of us less common folk.
How nice, . . . and isn't that special how superior you are . . .
Pennylynn,
Please stop limiting others, for the capacity to learn and to enjoy Life, and their Christian knowledge and understanding.
If I must say, . . .
I have a 50 year personal degree, in reading the Bible, Christian manuscripts literature, and world-wide historical accounts of world history.
I have a numinous collection of books on history, and have read Will Durant's books Story of Civilization.
And especially enjoy the volume "Christ and Cesar," and commentary.
Here are some of Will Durant's quotation's on education and life; They are fascinating . . . . and is very insightful about the arrogance and hubris of some people.
a. Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance.
b. Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.
c. One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say.
d. Inquiry is fatal to certainty.
e. Education is the t***smission of civilization.
f. History is mostly guessing; the rest is prejudice.
g. Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art.
h. The trouble with most people is that they think with their hopes or fears or wishes rather than with their minds.
I. The family is the nucleus of civilization.
J. It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country.
Pennylynn,
Take your pick to your opposition's to Dr. Taylor Marshal, "Here’s a Defense of the Traditional Date for Christmas . . . December 25"
1. Dr. Marshal's 2754 word two page article.
Arguably, It could be the most simplistic accounting as the Jewish priest biblical record.
2. And of human gestation birth period and 40 week accounting, from the of the Day of Atonement, which lands on the tenth day of the Hebrew month of Tishri (roughly the end of our September).
Immediately after this entry into the temple and message of the Archangel Gabriel, Zacharias and Elizabeth conception of John the Baptist.
Allowing for forty weeks of gestation, this places the birth of John the Baptist at the end of June—
Once again confirming the Catholic and Orthodoxy Church faiths date for the “Nativity of Saint John the Baptist” on June 24.
3. The rest of the dating is rather simple.
We read that just after the Immaculate Virgin Mary conceived Christ, she went to visit her cousin Elizabeth who was six months pregnant with John the Baptist.
This means that John the Baptist was six months older that our Lord Jesus Christ.
(Luke 1:24-27, 36).
4. If you add six months to June 24 you get December 24-25 as the birthday of Christ.
Then, if you subtract nine months from December 25 you get that the Annunciation was March 25.
All the dates match up perfectly.
Pennylynn,
So then, if John the Baptist was conceived shortly after the Jewish Day of the Atonement, then the traditional Catholic dates are essentially correct.
If this article is two long for you, for simple a 2,754 word two page article, it's just an excuse and an inability to participate in a logical discussion on your part.
Right now I am participating in an 365 day online-course on Saint Thomas Aquinas "Suma Theologica", This article is simplistic than the "Suma Theologica."
There is no comparison to this article by Dr. Marshal to Saint Thomas Aquinas "Suma Theologica"
I do believe also, that any person has the mental capacity and Christian ability, just to use their mind as God gave them to use it.
I have three college university degrees against your educational biases rational argument.
Pennylynn,
"Which "Does not compute with this stance and position of defense argumentation."
All you posed and replied back to me is a fallacy argumentation, take your pick on which literary fallacy argument you have chosen, or do you need me to list the idom's for you.
The human mind can grasp any theory, or educational doctrine, . . . than what you present in discussion on the, Defense of the Traditional Date for Christmas . . . December 25.
Pennylynn you have made it difficult to discuss the option of "Defense of the Traditional Date for Christmas . . . December 25."
By hiding behind your limiting position of an education and knowledgeable people of higher degrees in religious applied learning.
Is this what your papa told you ?
You took a cop-out position because you don't want to talk about a simplistic assessment of what the Bible says in facts, knowledge and of t***h.
1. Look at the historical jewish facts about;
Since your have a rabbinical background, and have been educated, with many advanced degrees.
Who here does not want to discuss the article issues, rather than participating in an on-line degree program where someone lectures on issues.
Pennylynn words
"Discussions leave room for differing ideas (which do not requiring a degree of personal insight, intellect, and reasoning) whereas a lecture is a one sided.
In every lecture there is a Question and answer section, I believed Dr. Marshal answered those objections right away in the article.
So we are now talking about, Biblical facts, Facts, FACTs. . . .
What does that mean in a discussion comment by you. Please explain ?
Quote "Believe as I tell you, command." More educational gibberish educational talk.
Pennylynn,
Could your educated opinion, be wrong ?
In its' is simplistically approach of looking at the Biblical narratives and that easy to answer the biblical account of Zacharias, as he served in the “course of Abias.”
And Elezabeth's 40 week gestation and birth of her son, John the Baptist.
The most important words of of John's mouth were, "He must increase, but I must decrease.”
John3:30
I believe that your education and probably in your Jewish roots and quite your possibility of protestant conversion, or leanings, e.g.
With many an advanced degrees and who is not participating in the discussion, and not here to discuss issues, but only to dispute Dr. Marshal's findings with an education degree. Oh my how sad, how disingenuous . . .
Pennylynn
a. All one has to do is look at the biblical facts, the human factor of conception and 40 week birth gestation period and the rest is so very simple . . .
"To be deep in history, is to cease being Protestant, and or of Judaism for that matter.
Doc110
Pennylynn wrote:
I read most of it... but frankly, it is much too long and not well organized.
You simply present a lecture... leaving no open for discussion.
It is also a cut/paste which could have been accomplished (for the amount of personal opinion and thought you added) with a link to the school room lecture.
Most of us have been educated, many with advanced degrees who are here to discuss issues rather than participating in an on-line degree program where someone lectures on issues.
Discussions leave room for differing ideas (requiring a degree of personal insight, intellect, and reasoning) whereas a lecture is a one sided, believe as I tell you, command.
I simply ignored most of the lecture and gave an educated opinion, which is really all the author of your link provided as there is no 'proof' found in the document.
I "deduced" from information provided in the Bible, from first hand observations, and widely known facts.
You come back to your safe room of "read the article" because there is no other t***hs.
br br I read most of it... but frankly, it is mu... (
show quote)