What is the liberal agenda? Not what liverals think.
May 4, 2014 21:49:56 #
May 4, 2014 22:05:18 #
alex wrote:
he just meant the t***h is so d********g to him
He usually reverts to his University of the Gutter vocabulary when he gets his dander up.
May 4, 2014 22:05:58 #
Glaucon wrote:
That is the most d********g, mean spirited, destru... (show quote)
In that you consider "Rational conservatives" or responsible Republicans" as those who agree with YOU! You won't find any! But you might find RINOs You demonstrate your intelligence by believing all of Obama's (or wh**ever his name is) lies and agreeing with anything he does, and still worshiping the Usurper It must be hard being a liberal! (and you are irritating the pig)
May 4, 2014 22:07:47 #
Glaucon wrote:
Those who can't teach and can't do often tend to become political extremists.
There you go bragging about yourself again!
May 5, 2014 05:30:17 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
Lena wrote:
I also like to give you h**ers a chance to be jerks. It makes you feel better to attack rather than search facts out.
*******************
I believe you're the jerk who has more h**e then almost anyone on this forum.
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
May 5, 2014 05:37:28 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
astrolite wrote:
Well, can you prove it's not his name? He won't provide any proof of anything, but you still give him the benefit of the doubt! But that's the proof of your refusal to investigate! Like I say: "I believe in Jesus and God! All others must prove it"
**************
Prove what? Jesus and God?
May 5, 2014 05:42:36 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
Glaucon wrote:
Deep thought.
Democrats bad - Republicans good. Actually, this might be considered very shallow and perhaps not quite a thought, but it apparently makes some people feel good and are convinced they are thinking or, at least capable of thinking.
Democrats bad - Republicans good. Actually, this might be considered very shallow and perhaps not quite a thought, but it apparently makes some people feel good and are convinced they are thinking or, at least capable of thinking.
************
Good take-of from animal farm.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
May 5, 2014 09:28:40 #
Alicia wrote:
**************
Prove what? Jesus and God?
Prove what? Jesus and God?
The comment was about "Faith", Meaning believing something without proof! I said I believe in Jesus and God. Without "Proof". But the lies of Obama (or wh**ever his name is) I don't believe without proof! Meaning that we have only the lies of his ilk, no proof of any kind! All of his records are sealed. So...if his perfidity can't be proved ......... neither can his accomplishments! Have you ever been in a lawyers or doctors office?? Of course! Have you seen his diplomas DISPLAYED ON HIS WALL ?? now? He is proud of his education and accomplishments! And displays PROOF! But Obama (or wh**ever his name is) hides ALL of his records! And expects you to believe wh**ever his syncophants blatt! Even his actions are different from his promises! I think I'm reasonable in NOT BELIEVING ANY of his lies! I HAVE NO FAITH IN HIM! And I can't understand why the liberals still worship him, knowing that he isn't what they were told!
May 5, 2014 10:04:45 #
astrolite wrote:
There you go bragging about yourself again!
Not quite correct. Those who can, do. Those who cannot, teach. Those who can neither do nor teach become Progressives.
May 5, 2014 13:22:20 #
Loki wrote:
Not quite correct. Those who can, do. Those who cannot, teach. Those who can neither do nor teach become Progressives.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
May 5, 2014 16:39:16 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
Loki wrote:
Not quite correct. Those who can, do. Those who cannot, teach. Those who can neither do nor teach become Progressives.
*************
Right on! I differ with your statement in that I can both DO and TEACH.
:D :D :D :D :D
May 5, 2014 17:41:04 #
Alicia wrote:
*************
Right on! I differ with your statement in that I can both DO and TEACH.
:D :D :D :D :D
Right on! I differ with your statement in that I can both DO and TEACH.
:D :D :D :D :D
Teach what?
May 5, 2014 18:11:38 #
Loki wrote:
Teach what?
Liberal Progressivism. At that she excels.
May 5, 2014 18:41:19 #
It seemed confusing what Lena presented at first but her first comment afterwards suggested she was doing a little "bait and switch": appearing to support one thing when really using that to emphasize the support of the opposite.
May 5, 2014 18:53:16 #
Lena wrote:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/executiveorders.asp
Read these and tell me your still a democrat.
Read these and tell me your still a democrat.
It isn't the number of executive orders that bother me, it's the content of the executive orders that scares me to death!!! I am so proud to say I am NOT a democRAT!!! I didn't v**e for obama either time!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.