I don't know who the dems were who wanted to remove the free speech clause from the first.But you hear these radical morons on here always say we are doing away Democracy.
vernon wrote:
I don't know who the dems were who wanted to remove the free speech clause from the first.But you hear these radical morons on here always say we are doing away Democracy.
Yeah we are,because its not a Democracy,its a Republic...Even i know that..
Do you happen to know what he wants regulated? Start linking sources for context, or is it from your handler's memo's?
proud republican wrote:
Yeah we are,because its not a Democracy,its a Republic...Even i know that..
Define republic for me since you know that?
Where did the part about a government by the people for the people go? In a democracy the majority rules, and that is part of the divide here as republicans just don't have the numbers anymore and won't relinquish power.
proud republican wrote:
My handler????? img src="https://static.onepoliti... (
show quote)
There is some disagreement about free speech where incitement and infringing on others is concerned. Also where lies and propaganda are concerned. There is a gray line involving knowing you are fraudulently representing things depending on what the motivation is...
which is why I wanted to know what the context with Ted L is
Statements like yours that have no context become part of the uninformed rhetoric and noise, the right lives in that zone....
a dem wants to do away with free speech...you could drive a truck through the holes in that.
proud republican wrote:
My handler????? img src="https://static.onepoliti... (
show quote)
Woody's delusional. Thinks you have a Russian handler.
Unfriggin believable.
woodguru wrote:
Define republic for me since you know that?
Where did the part about a government by the people for the people go? In a democracy the majority rules, and that is part of the divide here as republicans just don't have the numbers anymore and won't relinquish power.
Have you ever taken a civics or USA government class? If so, you should have paid attention. If not, you need one.
woodguru wrote:
There is some disagreement about free speech where incitement and infringing on others is concerned. Also where lies and propaganda are concerned. There is a gray line involving knowing you are fraudulently representing things depending on what the motivation is...
which is why I wanted to know what the context with Ted L is
Statements like yours that have no context become part of the uninformed rhetoric and noise, the right lives in that zone....
a dem wants to do away with free speech...you could drive a truck through the holes in that.
There is some disagreement about free speech where... (
show quote)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-dem-ted-lieu-say-he-would-love-to-regulate-speech-bemoans-us-constitution-that-prohibits-him" There is some disagreement about free speech where incitement and infringing on others is concerned. Also where lies and propaganda are concerned. There is a gray line involving knowing you are fraudulently representing things depending on what the motivation is..."
I am guessing that you would find most speech that you disagree with to be " lies and propaganda " and that you would declare it to be " incitement and infringing on others ".
The US is the last place on Earth where free speech is protected. In Canada and Europe the government declares what ever it dislikes to be h**e speech. I bet you'd love those h**e speech laws to come to America, right ?
proud republican wrote:
Yeah we are,because its not a Democracy,its a Republic...Even i know that..
Darned good thing it isn't a Democracy unless you want the population centers of NY & California controlling everything. Thank God the founders recognized this and created the E*******l College. At 84 I don't know how long I will be any part of this show but you youngsters had better watch out for Democraps v***r f***d and repeated attempts to get rid of the E*******l College.
woodguru wrote:
Do you happen to know what he wants regulated? Start linking sources for context, or is it from your handler's memo's?
No woodguru, you should ask Lieu. The video has been on Tucker Carson.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.