nwtk2007 wrote:
It's been said by many that any money spent to help a campaign is a campaign donation and must, by law, be reported.
Well, we and the owners of CNN, MSNBC, the NYT and WaPo know, all too wwell, that their "journalists" are working to subvert the Trump administration and were, before the e******n, working to subvert his campaign. They were, in fact, campaigning against Trump and FOR Hillary Clinton. The owners of these stations knew this to be the fact of what their "journalists" were doing and openly paid their salaries.
I'd like to know why their salary payments to these "journalists" are not, in fact then, campaign contributions?????? They certainly knew the bias of their "journalists" and knew for a fact that they were working to help candidates, especially Hillary Clinton.
These payments made by Cohen and the National Enquirer, especially the later, seem to me to be pretty much the same as paying those salaries of the guys trying to help Clinton through their reporting. And, I seriously doubt they were reported as such by the Clinton campaign and others.
It's been said by many that any money spent to hel... (
show quote)
Yeah, the l*****t media not only gave Hillary millions of free support, encouragement, polling and advertising, much of it in the form of slanderous attacks on Trump during his candidacy, as the nominee and after his victory.
Between Jan. 1 2015 and Aug. 30 2016, those who identified themselves in federal campaign finance filings as journalists, reporters, news editors or television news anchors — and others known to be working in journalism — donated $382,000 combined to the Clinton campaign.
In addition,
George Soros, through a variety of fronts, donated $8 million to Hillary's campaign;
The media took no notice of the federal court filing that exposed an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the DNC and the Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 p**********l e******n in violation of federal campaign-finance law;
While the Uranium One deal was on the table, the Justice Department uncovered evidence that Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, creating the appearance, at least of a conflict of interest, since Hillary Clinton, who was then Secretary of State, signed off on the Uranium One purchase.
When Hillary Clinton agreed to be Secretary of State during President Obama's first term, she promised her distance from the Clinton Foundation. The foundation also agreed to limit foreign donations.
Both agreements were for good reasons. Foreign officials and governments were big donors to the Clintons' family foundation, and there were concerns in the Obama administration about conflicts of interest between the foundation and Hillary Clinton's work at Secretary of State.
But during the p**********l campaign, evidence emerged that both Clinton and the foundation had failed to live up to those promises. Clinton and her top officials continued to have a cozy relationship with the foundation throughout her tenure at State, and evidence strongly suggest that Clinton was granting access and favors to major Clinton Foundation donors.
In addition, the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of donations from foreign governments while Hillary was at State, including one that violated an ethics agreement it had with the Obama administration.In total, the Hillary Campaign raised $795 million, nearly twice what Trump had raised. Trump invested $88 million of his own money and he sold his entire stock portfolio for $40 million. In total Trump raised $400 million.
In her book, "What Happened", Hillary suggests that Donald Trump got $5 billion in free media coverage. She never mentions that 96% of it was negative.
Cohen paid Daniels from his law firm's account. Not a CFL violation. Those who have been paying attention to the details already know the entire sordid affair surrounding Daniels attempts to vilify president Trump. She secured the services of the sleaze shyster Avenatti who filed two lawsuits in LA district court for defamation of character (this is no joke). For breach of a legal contract (the none disclosure agreement with Trump), the federal judge threw out her suits and ordered her to pay Trump's legal fees, a total of $294,000--over twice what she was paid to keep her mouth shut.
I heard an attorney who is quite familiar with the CFL explain it this way. A candidate buys a new suit, a new pair of shoes, and gets manicure, a shave and a haircut, and he rents a limo. He does this to improve his image, to help his campaign. He pays for the clothing and services out of his own pocket. This expenditure is not a violation of CFL. Even if he paid with his wife's credit card or a friend loaned him the money, it is not a violation of CFL.
Compiled from these sources:
NYT
WaPo
New Yorker
FEC.gov
NCSL.org
Business Insider
Open Secrets
The Hill
Time.com
Campaign Finance Institute
Dayton Daily News
Maplight
The Federalist