One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Federal Prosecutors Concluded that Donald Trump Directed a Criminal Conspiracy With Michael Cohen.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Dec 11, 2018 01:21:48   #
PeterS
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
MSNBC and CNN have been paying their "journalists" to hammer Trump with negative stories, obviously to effect the e******n and future e******ns. I guess their salaries are also campaign donations!

The Journalists for CNN and MSNBC aren't running for office so they can do with their salaries as they like...

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 06:25:03   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>The secret payment to the porn actress to keep an alleged affair quiet was already a potential legal problem for Trump because it may have violated campaign finance laws. If Trump knew about the payment, and if it was designed to help the campaign and it wasn’t properly disclosed, then it’s illegal.

The payment for Daniels came from Cohen and the payment for McDougal came from National Enquirer. Any item received that is a benefit of the campaign is a campaign contribution and has to be declared as such. That Trump decided to lie about these payments and hide them instead of declaring them is what has him in hot water. This is just the start of Muellers case--I'm sure there is much more he hasn't had to disclose yet.
b Snip>>>The secret payment to the porn ... (show quote)


Petersucker, you hypocritical moonbats are really splitting hairs on this bulls**t. Once again, you moonbats are in a rage and screaming impeach trumpy over campaign finance laws. T***h is, trumpy broke no laws and hasn’t been convicted or even indicted for anything. Another t***h is obammy broke campaign finance laws big time and was given a hefty fine. Why weren't you same moonbats squawking back then for Obama to be kicked out of office. Once again the “it’s only bad if Trump did it” Bulls**t rears its moonbatty head.

Politico:

"President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal E******n Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a p**********l campaign…

The major sticking point for the FEC appeared to be a series of missing 48-hour notices for nearly 1,300 contributions totaling more than $1.8 million — an issue that lawyers familiar with the commission’s work say the FEC takes seriously. The notices must be filed on contributions of $1,000 or more that are received within the 20-day window of E******n Day.

More than half of those contributions were t***sferred from the Obama Victory Fund,a joint committee between the campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

The document outlined other violations, such as erroneous contribution dates on some campaign reports. The Obama campaign was also late returning some contributions that exceeded the legal limit."

So obammy took almost $2 MILLION in illegal campaign contributions and trump may have paid off a couple of hos with his own money? Am I the only one who doesn’t think these two things are the same?

The best part about obammy’s violation is he didn’t even pay the fine off himself!

Sources said the fine resulting from the settlement agreement has been paid, with $230,000 coming from the obammy's campaign coffers and the remainder from the DNC.

Isn’t paying off a campaign violation fine with campaign funds another campaign violation?

I remember when this happened and I never saw one moonbat's screeching about obammy’s high crimes and misdemeanors. The moonbatty media practically ignored this story and certainly there were no moonbat activists calling for impeachment. Double-standard much? Hypocrisy? Idiocy?

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 06:58:23   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
The Journalists for CNN and MSNBC aren't running for office so they can do with their salaries as they like...


Was it a violation of campaign laws for the moonbat media to schlep for b***h clinton in 2016?

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2018 07:23:54   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
What does the NDA have to do with anything? The question at hand is whether Trump is on the hook for two felony counts for campaign finance violations. I think there is no question that the Trump campaign received something of value by having Daniels and McDougall keep their mouths shut which is all that is necessary for campaign finance laws to be violated.

As for why it's a campaign finance violation--Federal law, requires that payments for the purpose of influencing e******ns must be disclosed. Federal prosecutors in New York said that Cohen, in paying Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult film actress Stormy Daniels for their silence, “acted with the intent to influence the 2016 p**********l e******n,” and at Trump’s direction.
What does the NDA have to do with anything? The qu... (show quote)


What about suckerberg's facebook providing data on millions of its users to the re-e******n campaign of obammy? That would be an illegal corporate campaign contribution. Facebook gave the 2012 obammy campaign direct access to the personal data of Facebook users in violation of its internal rules, making a special exception for the campaign. Why isn't the FEC investigating that? There is a federal law baning corporations from making “direct or indirect” contributions to federal candidates. That ban extends beyond cash contributions to “any services, or anything of value.” In other words, corporations cannot provide federal candidates with free services of any kind.

http://www.trueactivist.com/criminal-in-chief-78-times-president-obama-broke-the-law-during-presidency/

Where was the screeching of you moonbats for obammy's impeachment?

Again, ALL ignored by you moonbatty obammy asskissers and the media. Can't touch them fedral n!993rs!

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 08:00:44   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
buffalo wrote:
What about suckerberg's facebook providing data on millions of its users to the re-e******n campaign of obammy? That would be an illegal corporate campaign contribution. Facebook gave the 2012 obammy campaign direct access to the personal data of Facebook users in violation of its internal rules, making a special exception for the campaign. Why isn't the FEC investigating that? There is a federal law baning corporations from making “direct or indirect” contributions to federal candidates. That ban extends beyond cash contributions to “any services, or anything of value.” In other words, corporations cannot provide federal candidates with free services of any kind.

http://www.trueactivist.com/criminal-in-chief-78-times-president-obama-broke-the-law-during-presidency/

Where was the screeching of you moonbats for obammy's impeachment?

Again, ALL ignored by you moonbatty obammy asskissers and the media. Can't touch them fedral n!993rs!
What about suckerberg's facebook providing data on... (show quote)





Reply
Dec 11, 2018 08:59:07   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
That's because them fedral n!993rs are above the law. For to prosecute them would be R****T! Petersucker and his moonbat minions are obammy's useful i***ts.

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 09:49:31   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
buffalo wrote:
That's because them fedral n!993rs are above the law. For to prosecute them would be R****T! Petersucker and his moonbat minions are obammy's useful i***ts.


That's crazy Buff, you need help.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2018 11:14:23   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
The Journalists for CNN and MSNBC aren't running for office so they can do with their salaries as they like...


Neither were Cohen or the National Enquirer. Now why must I point that out to you???

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 11:15:15   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
buffalo wrote:
What about suckerberg's facebook providing data on millions of its users to the re-e******n campaign of obammy? That would be an illegal corporate campaign contribution. Facebook gave the 2012 obammy campaign direct access to the personal data of Facebook users in violation of its internal rules, making a special exception for the campaign. Why isn't the FEC investigating that? There is a federal law baning corporations from making “direct or indirect” contributions to federal candidates. That ban extends beyond cash contributions to “any services, or anything of value.” In other words, corporations cannot provide federal candidates with free services of any kind.

http://www.trueactivist.com/criminal-in-chief-78-times-president-obama-broke-the-law-during-presidency/

Where was the screeching of you moonbats for obammy's impeachment?

Again, ALL ignored by you moonbatty obammy asskissers and the media. Can't touch them fedral n!993rs!
What about suckerberg's facebook providing data on... (show quote)


Very good point there buffalo!

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 11:18:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
buffalo wrote:
Petersucker, you hypocritical moonbats are really splitting hairs on this bulls**t. Once again, you moonbats are in a rage and screaming impeach trumpy over campaign finance laws. T***h is, trumpy broke no laws and hasn’t been convicted or even indicted for anything. Another t***h is obammy broke campaign finance laws big time and was given a hefty fine. Why weren't you same moonbats squawking back then for Obama to be kicked out of office. Once again the “it’s only bad if Trump did it” Bulls**t rears its moonbatty head.

Politico:

"President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal E******n Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a p**********l campaign…

The major sticking point for the FEC appeared to be a series of missing 48-hour notices for nearly 1,300 contributions totaling more than $1.8 million — an issue that lawyers familiar with the commission’s work say the FEC takes seriously. The notices must be filed on contributions of $1,000 or more that are received within the 20-day window of E******n Day.

More than half of those contributions were t***sferred from the Obama Victory Fund,a joint committee between the campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

The document outlined other violations, such as erroneous contribution dates on some campaign reports. The Obama campaign was also late returning some contributions that exceeded the legal limit."

So obammy took almost $2 MILLION in illegal campaign contributions and trump may have paid off a couple of hos with his own money? Am I the only one who doesn’t think these two things are the same?

The best part about obammy’s violation is he didn’t even pay the fine off himself!

Sources said the fine resulting from the settlement agreement has been paid, with $230,000 coming from the obammy's campaign coffers and the remainder from the DNC.

Isn’t paying off a campaign violation fine with campaign funds another campaign violation?

I remember when this happened and I never saw one moonbat's screeching about obammy’s high crimes and misdemeanors. The moonbatty media practically ignored this story and certainly there were no moonbat activists calling for impeachment. Double-standard much? Hypocrisy? Idiocy?
Petersucker, you hypocritical moonbats are really ... (show quote)


They are just grasping at straws. In the present case, the payoffs to the b***hes, Mueller knows perfectly well there is no violation of a campaign finance law. But he has to at least try to save face, if only for the i***ts infected with the Trump Derangement Syndrome and other stupid people who are just too stupid to be able to think for them selves! LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 11:18:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
buffalo wrote:
Was it a violation of campaign laws for the moonbat media to schlep for b***h clinton in 2016?


By the definition they are clinging to, it certainly was, as were many others!

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2018 11:55:35   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
They are just grasping at straws. In the present case, the payoffs to the b***hes, Mueller knows perfectly well there is no violation of a campaign finance law. But he has to at least try to save face, if only for the i***ts infected with the Trump Derangement Syndrome and other stupid people who are just too stupid to be able to think for them selves! LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Reply
Dec 11, 2018 12:03:22   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Bad Bob wrote:
That's crazy Buff, you need help.


You moonbats are the ones s**tting in your pants to get trumpy...

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 12:28:21   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
buffalo wrote:
You moonbats are the ones s**tting in your pants to get trumpy...


That's silly.

Reply
Dec 11, 2018 14:14:32   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
buffalo wrote:
You moonbats are the ones s**tting in your pants to get trumpy...


And now they are absolutely giddy with the new info from Mueller, as if it will effect Trump.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.