clerk of a bogus court
Dec 6, 2018 10:14:11 #
To Angela D. Caesar clerk United States District and Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia at 333 Constitution Ave. NW Washington DC [20001]
From Ron Vrooman
Hello Angela,
A Deputy Clerk returned our paper filed into the one supreme Court with claimed original jurisdiction Article III. The letter was addressed with a green card. Your staff signed received on Nov, 26. It was not addressed to your court. Your court is not an Article III court. Yet, your staff opened it and did not forward it. Then they returned a document filed into a different court after receiving and voiding our document by stamps.
There are several due process violations involved in your staff’s actions. I will add your staff’s violations to the list and include you as a defendant. Incontrovertible evidence by your court. Your court enclosed a form that attempted to extort money, to file into your court. Wrong court and file on demand is how it works for people.
I have found your court lacking in the past and it is in violation of due process now.
I withhold honor, as that is earned not bestowed. I am not a member of the BAR nor am I a US citizen. I find the actions of your court contemptuous of The United States of America’s Constitution circa 1859 and Oregon’s Constitution circa 1859. And our unalienable Constitutionally guaranteed responsibilities of your court..
Our paper was Notice and Demand and your court failed miserably.
Due process violations:1) opened registered, return receipt requested, green card mail not addressed to your court; 2) did not forward properly addressed filing into one supreme Court with claimed original jurisdiction; 3) failure to provide notice to the proper court as lawfully directed; 4) our document was filed on demand as is proper for people accessing the one supreme court of Article III, you court attempted to extort a fee for justice; 5) mutilating a filed document.
This communiqué is not intended to mislead, defraud, deceive or threaten in any way and is submitted in “good faith and with clean hands.” I do lawful not legal and this is my best effort.
I close with Love, peace, harmony and a prayer. A US Marshal has determined my prayer is not a threat. He then re neged on his word, which is only good one time. "Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition."
From Ron Vrooman
Hello Angela,
A Deputy Clerk returned our paper filed into the one supreme Court with claimed original jurisdiction Article III. The letter was addressed with a green card. Your staff signed received on Nov, 26. It was not addressed to your court. Your court is not an Article III court. Yet, your staff opened it and did not forward it. Then they returned a document filed into a different court after receiving and voiding our document by stamps.
There are several due process violations involved in your staff’s actions. I will add your staff’s violations to the list and include you as a defendant. Incontrovertible evidence by your court. Your court enclosed a form that attempted to extort money, to file into your court. Wrong court and file on demand is how it works for people.
I have found your court lacking in the past and it is in violation of due process now.
I withhold honor, as that is earned not bestowed. I am not a member of the BAR nor am I a US citizen. I find the actions of your court contemptuous of The United States of America’s Constitution circa 1859 and Oregon’s Constitution circa 1859. And our unalienable Constitutionally guaranteed responsibilities of your court..
Our paper was Notice and Demand and your court failed miserably.
Due process violations:1) opened registered, return receipt requested, green card mail not addressed to your court; 2) did not forward properly addressed filing into one supreme Court with claimed original jurisdiction; 3) failure to provide notice to the proper court as lawfully directed; 4) our document was filed on demand as is proper for people accessing the one supreme court of Article III, you court attempted to extort a fee for justice; 5) mutilating a filed document.
This communiqué is not intended to mislead, defraud, deceive or threaten in any way and is submitted in “good faith and with clean hands.” I do lawful not legal and this is my best effort.
I close with Love, peace, harmony and a prayer. A US Marshal has determined my prayer is not a threat. He then re neged on his word, which is only good one time. "Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition."
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.