JimMe

Any Congress - Dem or GOP - should start E******n Reform by:

1. Registration ends 30 days prior to General E******ns, and anyone's Registration Form postmarked later than the 30 days has the V**er deemed not Eligible to V**e in that General E******n
2. Early V****g ends 30 days prior to General E******ns, and all B****ts postmarked later than the 30 days are deemed invalid for the General E******n
3. Recounts are of only known B****ts that have been secured, and any B****ts found outside of the secured area are deemed invalid, and any B****ts found after any Recounting of B****ts has begun are deemed invalid
4. Runoff E******ns can only be V**ed-on by Citizens who have V**ed in that General E******n, and anyone not V****g in the General E******n is not allowed to V**e in the Runoff E******n
5. No one can cast a B****t for someone else
6. Any B****t proven to be signed by someone other than the Registered V**er is deemed invalid
7. Anyone not V****g in a General E******n in 4 years is Unregistered and is Ineligible to V**e until they Re-Register

Naturally, these E******n Reforms apply to only General Federal E******ns.

Liberty Tree

I would add legitimate, verifiable v**er ID to the list.

Wonttakeitanymore

When I worked the polls nov 6, many people came in to drop off mail in b****ts for others, prob while the others v**ed provisionally! No order, no ids, no accountability!!! I felt like asking for ids on everyone but they prob would have pitched me out! How do we get v**er Id required to Supreme Court?

Wonttakeitanymore

We have a Supreme Court that is conservative, we need to get things in order before 2020!

Wonttakeitanymore

California is extremely warped! Pray for us! Read chronicles 7:14!!!

Rose42

How about 8 weeks for nominees to campaign, get rid of the whole primary system. 8 weeks is plenty of time to lay out a platform and debate.

Add a third party and don't let the media freeze them out. This two party system is only becoming worse, not better. The founders even warned against it.

woodguru

What is verifiable v**er ID?

If someone is standing in front of you with ID such as a driver's license or other credible ID like VA card with a picture, and their name is on the v***r r**********n roll, they are good to go.

I looked at my driver's license to see if my signature matched, and to be perfectly frank I wouldn't consider it a match to what I signed on the b****t I sent in. So how do they handle signatures that don't match?

I don't think California has nearly the problems with e******n boards not wanting to count provisionals at all, or rejecting all the mail ins they can in certain counties or precincts. There are states aggressively purging hundreds of thousands of v**es and v**ers in a selective manner, and it isn't in an attempt to address any fraud, it's about negating one party's v**es. That's what federal laws need to be concerned with.

woodguru

What does that mean, you count on things going your way? If the supreme court follows the constitution it will be hard on red states violating v**er laws. If a "conservative" court supports the crap coming through the courts we are going to have warped e******ns.

Do conservatives even want f**r e******ns knowing their numbers will cause them to lose majorities in states being held by r****d e******ns?

F**r e******ns are not the friends of conservatives. Any state that has clear majorities of dems v****g but has far less representation is being done wrong. And if the party in power is using absurd tricks to make it harder for the other party to get v**ers out they need to answer to v**er suppression.

Wonttakeitanymore

U mean like dead people and i*****l a***ns?

maryjane

Me, too. I would like to see a state issued and restricted v**er identification card that is very difficult to duplicate. These cards cannot be issued except in person and after the person has provided verifiable proof of USA citizenship. The state restricted v**er I'D card cannot be used for anything else and can be used for v****g only in that state. The card must have a current photo, fingerprint, v**er signature, date issued, SS number and state specific emblem.

EconomistDon

Democrats would NEVER go with this. It shuts down many of their v****g fraud techniques.

One of our genius Democrat posters complained about v**er suppression in states that purged roles. He probably is unaware that two states that did it, purged all registrations for people born in the 1800s. There were thousands of them and they were v****g routinely. I wonder if our genius Democrat poster realizes that these people are at least 118 years old.