oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I thought this very thing when I heard O'Reilly spout these very words. I don't agree with him on a lot of things but certainly like the author of this article better and especially what he suggests as how to punish illegal holders of any kind of guns. Stick it to them so they can see what we mean about enforcement.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bill-oreilly-not-looking-out-for-you/

lana ward

I agree with him 99.9 % of the time. Many others must too, his show has been number 1 for 13 years- I DON'T agree with him on this!!

Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC

Lana-
I agree, Not one individual ever, even Jesus. Could claim victory with winning the Masses. Bill O'Riley rarely suggests that
"It's his way or the Highway" he simply affords the public his researched interpretation on the topic. The fact that people become irritated , or worse malicious is repugnant. A large (Progressive, Liberal,Democratic ) section of America only receives their information from a Blatantly Biased Media. This is not my opinion. I base this conclusion on well researched quantitative, qualitative,empirical evidence. Better known as facts, or to the ill-informed masses. The t***h. Going back to the day's of Adams and Jefferson, this Phenom has been perpetrated by sanctimonious Journalists posing as objective unbiased reporters. Nothing could be further from the t***h.
Don't misconstrue my meaning or intent. I certainly do not take anyone's word on any topic as dogma. It's an individuals responsibility to find the t***h for themselves. Only through due diligence.. Unfortunately, most are unable to rely on their own cognitive reasoning to accomplish this task..

lana ward

I know. The MSM reports only what they want you to hear. No t***h ever about Obama. These networks should all be sued for not telling the t***h to their listeners. They perform a GREAT disservice to their viewers

Pauly55

Just my opinion but this website is over the top, proves that there are as many right-wing kooks as left -wing kooks. I didn't think that was possible. :-(

Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC

Pauly,
Rather than recant my previous post, I'll just say this. i believe half of what I see and none of what I hear. My above
response clearly shows that O'Riley though not always correct. Try's to remain impartial and objectively unbiased. The only way to
find any absolute information is to research it yourself. This involves more than simply listening to the talking heads on any Media outlet. Furthermore, reading any material from the biased rags that inundated the internet and street corners. Thee are threads of their interpretation of the t***h in every outlet.
It's time consuming and a tedious process at best.

Yankee Clipper

oldroy, I can't argue with that article. I also agree Bill is wearing a little thin.

Yankee Clipper

Perhaps you are a moderate of either party willing to compromise your freedoms and liberties away. Perhaps you are a Marxist, how would I know at this point.

I think the right wing kooks you perceive here are actually Constitutional conservatives who what the government brought back under control.

Perhaps we are as passionate as our Marxist opponents are, you know, our enemies of freedom and liberty. A lot of us believe in using Saul Alinski's "Rules for Radicals" against the l*****ts on this site. Is that a problem?

Pauly55

You're correct Mr Clipper, you don't know what I am, and I ain't saying. Read the comments after the article and you judge what's kooky. I am an Oreilly fan and do believe he does look out for the everyday people but I still do not have to agree with everything he says.

Yankee Clipper

What you are will eventually come out, I really don't care. I believe Kooky was your choice of words not mine. You made more than a few good points, at least points I agree with. And of course some I don't agree with. I don't expect for everyone to always agree all of the time.