One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
You only think you know. Jim sent this to me and I post it.
Nov 29, 2018 11:12:44   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
I know where years 1860 and 1861 reside in Denver, my book is from 1868. Also, these are not Colorado constitutions, but british legal theory law books of statutes.
The reason the constitutions and statutes are combined in a single book is the theory the federal constitution is superior, then the state constitution stands in second place, with state statutes adding direction for new business not found in the constitutions.
Ron, if you mention the original 13th, you are shooting yourself in the foot. T.O.N.A was properly ratified, but not properly adopted, and is absolutely unconstitutional.
For years I told people of this treasonous alteration, and showed people it is in law book, and what happened is;
People took off with it screaming fraud for the wrong reason.
The importance of having this evidence of the 13th is;
This evidence proves the treason of past congressmen, president elects, federal and state judges and many others usurping government power for individual gain, the definition of treason.
A year ago I made another 6500 mile trip locating government documents from America's past, and found 100% perfected evidence for conviction of treason going back to 1789.
As per the federal constitution there can be no trial for treason once a guilty party dies, but the American People can still take back America from the british crown.
The federal constitution is perfect, but the America People will not read it to know;
There no statement that upon proving treason by let say John Adams who committed treason on April 21, 1789 and died in 1826, that everything he signed is null and void after April 21, 1789. The importance to this is;
The bill or rights is unconstitutional, and it is the 7th amendment that put America People back under british legal control, the very legal control you have fought everyday I have known you. (and I am thinking you are about to file back to the british legal system again)
The original 13th, T.O.N.A., was put in place by employees of the british crown, so if/when they are discovered as guilty of treason against the u.S., they can simply say I took a title of nobility and an no long an American citizen, and so cannot be prosecuted for treason against the u.S.
This unconstitutional action by treasonous criminals employed by our federal government in 1809 can be exposed to the America People, thus exposing the treason. No, we cannot dig up these assholes for prosecution, but we can make null this unconstitutional action, just as we the People can throw off the unconstitutional action of the bill of rights.
We do not need the bill of right, as the constitution does not give anything to the government returned to the People by the bill of rights.
The People maintained all rights not t***sferred to the federal government employees, like the freedom of the press, or keep and bear arms or the rights of private property ownership.
So you know, there is no harm in the bill of rights saying we can have guns and a printing press with unjust taking of private property, by the American People got fucked in the ass with the 7th amendment, and without lube.
Anyway, I found T.O.N.A. back to 1812, so the 1819 crap about NH is wrong.
As for joining in, I will expose this to trump someday and that day may be sooner than we think.
Be careful.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.