Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth: Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth A group of House...

Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth

A group of House Democrats recently proved to be science deniers when they exclaimed that it is both “cruel” and, even more amazingly, “un-scientific” to define people based on their birth g****r.

Once again the Democrats have proven to be the party of politics over facts by sending a letter to the White House to protest his possible policy of returning the definition of g****r back to its science-based idea of natural birth g****r in government policy.

In their letter, the Democrats accused the Trump administration of pushing a policy that “makes it clear that members of this administration are willing to … solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and alarming view of the world.”

So, saying that people are born either male or female is “alarming”? Yes, so say Democrats who think there are 58 g****rs.

Continuing their all-out assault on t***h, reality, and science, the Democrats go on to insist that the proposed policy change would take away protections against sexual discrimination.

This proposal intended to erase t*********r people from federal civil rights protection and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws … Under this proposal, it is possible for a t*********r person to be denied access to medical care or health insurance or be refused access to emergency shelter or public housing, and t*********r children could be denied access to public education.

This screed ends with a risible accusation saying “This proposal is an unequivocal attack on the dignity and lives of American citizens. We demand a complete rejection of this shameless attempt to eliminate the rights of t*********r people.”

This, of course, is all lunacy. There are already laws on the books to prevent sexual discrimination. Returning the official definition of g****r back to the science-based birth g****r will do nothing to foster or excuse discrimination.

Of course, this Democrat letter is all in service to the mental illness known as t*********rism.

https://eaglerising.com/63678/democrats-claim-it-is-cruel-and-un-scientific-to-define-g****r-by-natural-birth/

bahmer

Oldsailor65 wrote:

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth

A group of House Democrats recently proved to be science deniers when they exclaimed that it is both “cruel” and, even more amazingly, “un-scientific” to define people based on their birth g****r.

Once again the Democrats have proven to be the party of politics over facts by sending a letter to the White House to protest his possible policy of returning the definition of g****r back to its science-based idea of natural birth g****r in government policy.

In their letter, the Democrats accused the Trump administration of pushing a policy that “makes it clear that members of this administration are willing to … solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and alarming view of the world.”

So, saying that people are born either male or female is “alarming”? Yes, so say Democrats who think there are 58 g****rs.

Continuing their all-out assault on t***h, reality, and science, the Democrats go on to insist that the proposed policy change would take away protections against sexual discrimination.

This proposal intended to erase t*********r people from federal civil rights protection and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws … Under this proposal, it is possible for a t*********r person to be denied access to medical care or health insurance or be refused access to emergency shelter or public housing, and t*********r children could be denied access to public education.

This screed ends with a risible accusation saying “This proposal is an unequivocal attack on the dignity and lives of American citizens. We demand a complete rejection of this shameless attempt to eliminate the rights of t*********r people.”

This, of course, is all lunacy. There are already laws on the books to prevent sexual discrimination. Returning the official definition of g****r back to the science-based birth g****r will do nothing to foster or excuse discrimination.

Of course, this Democrat letter is all in service to the mental illness known as t*********rism.

https://eaglerising.com/63678/democrats-claim-it-is-cruel-and-un-scientific-to-define-g****r-by-natural-birth/

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to... (show quote)

If you use many churches belief that the earth is approximately 6000 years old from the garden of eden to presint then it has worked pretty well for all of those years as to determining what sex you were at birth. I just don't see any justification for changing it now.

PeterS

Oldsailor65 wrote:

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth

A group of House Democrats recently proved to be science deniers when they exclaimed that it is both “cruel” and, even more amazingly, “un-scientific” to define people based on their birth g****r.

Once again the Democrats have proven to be the party of politics over facts by sending a letter to the White House to protest his possible policy of returning the definition of g****r back to its science-based idea of natural birth g****r in government policy.

In their letter, the Democrats accused the Trump administration of pushing a policy that “makes it clear that members of this administration are willing to … solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and alarming view of the world.”

So, saying that people are born either male or female is “alarming”? Yes, so say Democrats who think there are 58 g****rs.

Continuing their all-out assault on t***h, reality, and science, the Democrats go on to insist that the proposed policy change would take away protections against sexual discrimination.

This proposal intended to erase t*********r people from federal civil rights protection and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws … Under this proposal, it is possible for a t*********r person to be denied access to medical care or health insurance or be refused access to emergency shelter or public housing, and t*********r children could be denied access to public education.

This screed ends with a risible accusation saying “This proposal is an unequivocal attack on the dignity and lives of American citizens. We demand a complete rejection of this shameless attempt to eliminate the rights of t*********r people.”

This, of course, is all lunacy. There are already laws on the books to prevent sexual discrimination. Returning the official definition of g****r back to the science-based birth g****r will do nothing to foster or excuse discrimination.

Of course, this Democrat letter is all in service to the mental illness known as t*********rism.

https://eaglerising.com/63678/democrats-claim-it-is-cruel-and-un-scientific-to-define-g****r-by-natural-birth/

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to... (show quote)

And your argument is that it's compassionate to force someone into a sexual assignment they are uncomfortable with?

bahmer

PeterS wrote:

And your argument is that it's compassionate to force someone into a sexual assignment they are uncomfortable with?

If they are uncomfortable with sexual assignment then they should seek psychiatric consoling for there feelings regarding there sexual assignment and I would put a prohibition on any male that just because he feels like he is a female can enter and play in a sport designed for females only.

Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa

PeterS wrote:

And your argument is that it's compassionate to force someone into a sexual assignment they are uncomfortable with?

*******************************************
My argument states that every mammal, which humans are a member of are born "EITHER" male or female and that's it.
If you are not happy with the way nature born you then that's tough. If you decide that you want to be called by a female name instead of the male name on your birth certificate that's up to you but to all normal people you will be known by the g****r you were born with.

Comment Loc: California

Oldsailor65 wrote:

*******************************************
My argument states that every mammal, which humans are a member of are born "EITHER" male or female and that's it.
If you are not happy with the way nature born you then that's tough. If you decide that you want to be called by a female name instead of the male name on your birth certificate that's up to you but to all normal people you will be known by the g****r you were born with.

This g****r issue is homosexual's con game.

PeterS

bahmer wrote:

If they are uncomfortable with sexual assignment then they should seek psychiatric consoling for there feelings regarding there sexual assignment and I would put a prohibition on any male that just because he feels like he is a female can enter and play in a sport designed for females only.

Psychiatric counseling is already recommended for of all g****r reassignment therapy. As for what you would do, if ever you are elected dictator you are free to do as you like...

PeterS

Oldsailor65 wrote:

*******************************************
My argument states that every mammal, which humans are a member of are born "EITHER" male or female and that's it.
If you are not happy with the way nature born you then that's tough. If you decide that you want to be called by a female name instead of the male name on your birth certificate that's up to you but to all normal people you will be known by the g****r you were born with.

Why is that tough? What sex is a hermaphrodite? Is your psyche so fragile that you can't handle the decisions made by others? How does the fact that someone is t*********r alter your universe?

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

PeterS wrote:

And your argument is that it's compassionate to force someone into a sexual assignment they are uncomfortable with?

It VERY PLAIN Pete...

Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?” And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” Matthew 19:3-6

There are only two God-ordained sexes Pete...male and female! And nothing you believe or can do or say can change that ABSOLUTE T***H!

Terryann

Amen to that, your DNA and c********es can't change what g****r you were born. God made all of us, if you have a problem with your g****r, I think you have some serious issues and need some phyological help.

JoyV

Oldsailor65 wrote:

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth

A group of House Democrats recently proved to be science deniers when they exclaimed that it is both “cruel” and, even more amazingly, “un-scientific” to define people based on their birth g****r.

Once again the Democrats have proven to be the party of politics over facts by sending a letter to the White House to protest his possible policy of returning the definition of g****r back to its science-based idea of natural birth g****r in government policy.

In their letter, the Democrats accused the Trump administration of pushing a policy that “makes it clear that members of this administration are willing to … solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and alarming view of the world.”

So, saying that people are born either male or female is “alarming”? Yes, so say Democrats who think there are 58 g****rs.

Continuing their all-out assault on t***h, reality, and science, the Democrats go on to insist that the proposed policy change would take away protections against sexual discrimination.

This proposal intended to erase t*********r people from federal civil rights protection and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws … Under this proposal, it is possible for a t*********r person to be denied access to medical care or health insurance or be refused access to emergency shelter or public housing, and t*********r children could be denied access to public education.

This screed ends with a risible accusation saying “This proposal is an unequivocal attack on the dignity and lives of American citizens. We demand a complete rejection of this shameless attempt to eliminate the rights of t*********r people.”

This, of course, is all lunacy. There are already laws on the books to prevent sexual discrimination. Returning the official definition of g****r back to the science-based birth g****r will do nothing to foster or excuse discrimination.

Of course, this Democrat letter is all in service to the mental illness known as t*********rism.

https://eaglerising.com/63678/democrats-claim-it-is-cruel-and-un-scientific-to-define-g****r-by-natural-birth/

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to... (show quote)

So it is NOT alarming to allow unvetted unidentifiable refugees from centers of terrorism. It is NOT alarming to allow thousands at a time i******s who have proven themselves to be violent into our country. But is IS alarming to claim there are male babies and female babies born and that babies are not born naturally g****r fluid.

JoyV

PeterS wrote:

And your argument is that it's compassionate to force someone into a sexual assignment they are uncomfortable with?

Is is compassionate to allow males who "feel" like they are females compete in female wrestling or weight lifting competitions? If they want to dress and act like they assume their opposite g****r acts; then no law has been proposed to stop them.

JoyV

PeterS wrote:

Why is that tough? What sex is a hermaphrodite? Is your psyche so fragile that you can't handle the decisions made by others? How does the fact that someone is t*********r alter your universe?

Hermaphrodites are born with both male and female parts. They are not born one way and then decide one day they want to be hermaphrodite!

Carol Kelly

Oldsailor65 wrote:

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to Define G****r by Natural Birth

A group of House Democrats recently proved to be science deniers when they exclaimed that it is both “cruel” and, even more amazingly, “un-scientific” to define people based on their birth g****r.

Once again the Democrats have proven to be the party of politics over facts by sending a letter to the White House to protest his possible policy of returning the definition of g****r back to its science-based idea of natural birth g****r in government policy.

In their letter, the Democrats accused the Trump administration of pushing a policy that “makes it clear that members of this administration are willing to … solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and alarming view of the world.”

So, saying that people are born either male or female is “alarming”? Yes, so say Democrats who think there are 58 g****rs.

Continuing their all-out assault on t***h, reality, and science, the Democrats go on to insist that the proposed policy change would take away protections against sexual discrimination.

This proposal intended to erase t*********r people from federal civil rights protection and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws … Under this proposal, it is possible for a t*********r person to be denied access to medical care or health insurance or be refused access to emergency shelter or public housing, and t*********r children could be denied access to public education.

This screed ends with a risible accusation saying “This proposal is an unequivocal attack on the dignity and lives of American citizens. We demand a complete rejection of this shameless attempt to eliminate the rights of t*********r people.”

This, of course, is all lunacy. There are already laws on the books to prevent sexual discrimination. Returning the official definition of g****r back to the science-based birth g****r will do nothing to foster or excuse discrimination.

Of course, this Democrat letter is all in service to the mental illness known as t*********rism.

https://eaglerising.com/63678/democrats-claim-it-is-cruel-and-un-scientific-to-define-g****r-by-natural-birth/

Democrats Claim it is ‘Cruel and Un-Scientific’ to... (show quote)

This entire business is evil and their stupidity shines. It’s ungodly, in defiance of Gods teaching. It’s human beings trying to do Gods business in the field of creation. How far will He allow this to go on? This effort to indoctrinate children is the MOST evil of all.
It makes me sick to my stomach.

bahmer

Carol Kelly wrote:

This entire business is evil and their stupidity shines. It’s ungodly, in defiance of Gods teaching. It’s human beings trying to do Gods business in the field of creation. How far will He allow this to go on? This effort to indoctrinate children is the MOST evil of all.
It makes me sick to my stomach.

Amen and Amen