I see topics where someone is talking about something so basic, that the logic is ridiculously easy to follow, and those on the right support it without thinking, it's blind support, and corrections actually should be really embarrassing.
I was talking about the signature matching thing, and how ridiculous the idea of denying a person's ID match in favor of a finger signature on a touch pad not matching is. Keep a sense of humor here, because that's the other thing people need when they are standing corrected on ignorance and bias.
You have to r******r to v**e, right? Your name is on the v**er roll that will be checked off when you either show up to v**e or mail your b****t in.
So you are standing in front of the person who checks your name on the v**er rolls. They are using your ID, they cross your name off. They look up at you and are seeing that your picture matches, you are who you seem to be.
We're done, and in all but a few states you are handed a b****t and an I v**ed sticker. You've registered, you have ID, you're physical presence is there to v**e, you are done with the exception of v****g.
Here's where the common sense comes in, and the bias rolls. Who is the poll worker challenging? It's going to be people he has a bias toward. Are they going to put the same burden on a shaky little old lady with a walker who's signature looks nothing like their signature on their ID?
What fraud does your common sense tell you a finger touch pad signature match is actually preventing or doing anything about? Try defending it with a straight face, keeping in mind the states who are using this crap in the first place.
woodguru wrote:
I see topics where someone is talking about something so basic, that the logic is ridiculously easy to follow, and those on the right support it without thinking, it's blind support, and corrections actually should be really embarrassing.
I was talking about the signature matching thing, and how ridiculous the idea of denying a person's ID match in favor of a finger signature on a touch pad not matching is. Keep a sense of humor here, because that's the other thing people need when they are standing corrected on ignorance and bias.
You have to r******r to v**e, right? Your name is on the v**er roll that will be checked off when you either show up to v**e or mail your b****t in.
So you are standing in front of the person who checks your name on the v**er rolls. They are using your ID, they cross your name off. They look up at you and are seeing that your picture matches, you are who you seem to be.
We're done, and in all but a few states you are handed a b****t and an I v**ed sticker. You've registered, you have ID, you're physical presence is there to v**e, you are done with the exception of v****g.
Here's where the common sense comes in, and the bias rolls. Who is the poll worker challenging? It's going to be people he has a bias toward. Are they going to put the same burden on a shaky little old lady with a walker who's signature looks nothing like their signature on their ID?
What fraud does your common sense tell you a finger touch pad signature match is actually preventing or doing anything about? Try defending it with a straight face, keeping in mind the states who are using this crap in the first place.
I see topics where someone is talking about someth... (
show quote)
The problem is Democrats fight v**er ID everytime it is proposed.
woodguru wrote:
I see topics where someone is talking about something so basic, that the logic is ridiculously easy to follow, and those on the right support it without thinking, it's blind support, and corrections actually should be really embarrassing.
I was talking about the signature matching thing, and how ridiculous the idea of denying a person's ID match in favor of a finger signature on a touch pad not matching is. Keep a sense of humor here, because that's the other thing people need when they are standing corrected on ignorance and bias.
You have to r******r to v**e, right? Your name is on the v**er roll that will be checked off when you either show up to v**e or mail your b****t in.
So you are standing in front of the person who checks your name on the v**er rolls. They are using your ID, they cross your name off. They look up at you and are seeing that your picture matches, you are who you seem to be.
We're done, and in all but a few states you are handed a b****t and an I v**ed sticker. You've registered, you have ID, you're physical presence is there to v**e, you are done with the exception of v****g.
Here's where the common sense comes in, and the bias rolls. Who is the poll worker challenging? It's going to be people he has a bias toward. Are they going to put the same burden on a shaky little old lady with a walker who's signature looks nothing like their signature on their ID?
What fraud does your common sense tell you a finger touch pad signature match is actually preventing or doing anything about? Try defending it with a straight face, keeping in mind the states who are using this crap in the first place.
I see topics where someone is talking about someth... (
show quote)
Here in georgia you also have to show ID and as far as finger prints not so much since I work in medical field over the year my finger prints are almost gone due to thing used to clean or used to disinfect also cleaning your house with bleach ect.So that is going to be a problem for some as me.And by the by you dont have to be republican to be just plain stupid
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.