https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-conway-jim-acosta-tape.htmlKellyanne Conway admitted that the tape the White House used as the basis for banning CNN’s Jim Acosta from the White House was altered.
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:
inRead invented by Teads
WALLACE: They say that — they say they’re going to do both.
I — and you brought up the press conference, this brings me to my final subject which is the now infamous confrontation with Jim Acosta at that news conference.
As you know, I have been very critical of Acosta’s behavior myself and I want to ask you about two responses by the White House. First, to tweet a video that was clearly altered to make it look like it was more of a physical confrontation than it really was, although I do think it was inappropriate. And second, to pull Acosta’s pass to get into the White House and to threaten to do that to other reporters.
CONWAY: Well, Chris, first of all, what do you mean by edited or, as others are saying, quote, doctored video? He either put his hands on her and grabbed the mic back, or he did not. And he clearly did.
WALLACE: No. He — he really did — but the video was altered and there are experts who have looked at it — to make it —
CONWAY: By that do you mean sped up (ph)?
WALLACE: — speed it up to make it look — pardon?
CONWAY: Oh, well, that’s not altered. That’s sped up.
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-conway-jim-acosta-tape.html
Kellyanne Conway admitted that the tape the White House used as the basis for banning CNN’s Jim Acosta from the White House was altered.
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:
inRead invented by Teads
WALLACE: They say that — they say they’re going to do both.
I — and you brought up the press conference, this brings me to my final subject which is the now infamous confrontation with Jim Acosta at that news conference.
As you know, I have been very critical of Acosta’s behavior myself and I want to ask you about two responses by the White House. First, to tweet a video that was clearly altered to make it look like it was more of a physical confrontation than it really was, although I do think it was inappropriate. And second, to pull Acosta’s pass to get into the White House and to threaten to do that to other reporters.
CONWAY: Well, Chris, first of all, what do you mean by edited or, as others are saying, quote, doctored video? He either put his hands on her and grabbed the mic back, or he did not. And he clearly did.
WALLACE: No. He — he really did — but the video was altered and there are experts who have looked at it — to make it —
CONWAY: By that do you mean sped up (ph)?
WALLACE: — speed it up to make it look — pardon?
CONWAY: Oh, well, that’s not altered. That’s sped up.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-... (
show quote)
nothing had changed he did it that is it no doctoring ..i seen when it happen just b/c the sped it up does not mean that it did not happen .
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-conway-jim-acosta-tape.html
Kellyanne Conway admitted that the tape the White House used as the basis for banning CNN’s Jim Acosta from the White House was altered.
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:
inRead invented by Teads
WALLACE: They say that — they say they’re going to do both.
I — and you brought up the press conference, this brings me to my final subject which is the now infamous confrontation with Jim Acosta at that news conference.
As you know, I have been very critical of Acosta’s behavior myself and I want to ask you about two responses by the White House. First, to tweet a video that was clearly altered to make it look like it was more of a physical confrontation than it really was, although I do think it was inappropriate. And second, to pull Acosta’s pass to get into the White House and to threaten to do that to other reporters.
CONWAY: Well, Chris, first of all, what do you mean by edited or, as others are saying, quote, doctored video? He either put his hands on her and grabbed the mic back, or he did not. And he clearly did.
WALLACE: No. He — he really did — but the video was altered and there are experts who have looked at it — to make it —
CONWAY: By that do you mean sped up (ph)?
WALLACE: — speed it up to make it look — pardon?
CONWAY: Oh, well, that’s not altered. That’s sped up.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-... (
show quote)
Your argument is so pathetic that it's just funny!
In sporting events close calls are often "instant replayed" at an altered speed, for clarity; does that make them "doctored" too?
Gatsby wrote:
Your argument is so pathetic that it's just funny!
In sporting events close calls are often "instant replayed" at an altered speed, for clarity; does that make them "doctored" too?
Yes if it is not "real time".
Bad Bob wrote:
Yes if it is not "real time".
You're desperately clutching at "California Straws" (things that don't exist)
.
Gatsby wrote:
You're desperately clutching at "California Straws" (things that don't exist)
.
Was the action sped up at anytime?
Bad Bob wrote:
Was the action sped up at anytime?
So with your uncanny observation, the speed of the frame will alter actual footage?? I've never laughed at you this loud and am still smiling at your ridiculously absurd theory. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-conway-jim-acosta-tape.html
Kellyanne Conway admitted that the tape the White House used as the basis for banning CNN’s Jim Acosta from the White House was altered.
Transcript via Fox News Sunday:
inRead invented by Teads
WALLACE: They say that — they say they’re going to do both.
I — and you brought up the press conference, this brings me to my final subject which is the now infamous confrontation with Jim Acosta at that news conference.
As you know, I have been very critical of Acosta’s behavior myself and I want to ask you about two responses by the White House. First, to tweet a video that was clearly altered to make it look like it was more of a physical confrontation than it really was, although I do think it was inappropriate. And second, to pull Acosta’s pass to get into the White House and to threaten to do that to other reporters.
CONWAY: Well, Chris, first of all, what do you mean by edited or, as others are saying, quote, doctored video? He either put his hands on her and grabbed the mic back, or he did not. And he clearly did.
WALLACE: No. He — he really did — but the video was altered and there are experts who have looked at it — to make it —
CONWAY: By that do you mean sped up (ph)?
WALLACE: — speed it up to make it look — pardon?
CONWAY: Oh, well, that’s not altered. That’s sped up.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/11/11/kellyanne-... (
show quote)
And she is right. You all want us to think that the video was doctored, it was NOT! It shows what happened, if they showed it in slow motion, then what?
Kazudy wrote:
And she is right. You all want us to think that the video was doctored, it was NOT! It shows what happened, if they showed it in slow motion, then what?
I saw it too!!! karate chop, damn near took her arm off!!!
Bad Bob wrote:
I saw it too!!! karate chop, damn near took her arm off!!!
I might be inclined to wonder if Acosta's husband is being abused, behind closed doors. Too, are there any reports of of abuse from Acosta's husband. Looks like Mueller will be done with his ""Collusion Confusion Delusion Solution"" soon, have him on it pronto.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.