Give us a fkng break. Trump has no love for Putin. And, you, are you so blind and dumb that you aren't aware of what the democrat party has become? "Democratic Party" is just a label now, a hashtag, a ticket to get a liberal progressive's name on the b****t. It's a movement, bubba, a liberal prog movement that began with an extremely bigoted and anti-American president over 100 years ago. Your lovable messiah, Obama, came damned close to bringing it to full fruition with his "fundamental t***sformation of America" scheme.

You see, liberal progressivism has its roots in the doctrines of European political philosophers, one of whom wrote the C*******t Manifesto. Do the names Marx, Engel, Hegel and Rousseau ring a bell? Yeah, it is the political philosophies of those foreigners that give today's progressive American politicians orgasms. Liberal progressivism is diametrically opposed to everything our American Republic stands for.

Seems to me that if you are going to vomit a boatload of anger and h**e for our nation you should at least know what freaking anti-American platform you are standing on.

Airforceone Democrats are not c*******t its Trump that loves Putin. It’s Trump that thinks Neo N**ies , White National, KKK, are good people how the hell did you come up with Democrats being c*******t please explain.,

| Reply Airforceone. In this dispute between Republicans and Democrats I try to be impartial. All extremes are bad and I believe that the t***h or what comes closest is not at the extremes. T***h is relative and depends on the position from the moment you look at it. It may be that the same object viewed from the left is one way and viewed from the right is otherwise. Then we have to look at the object from all sides.
Today the l*****t media want to make African Americans believe that the Republican Party is r****t, when the t***h is that Lincoln, the first Republican president, was the one who made possible the end of s***ery, with the opposition of the Democratic Party at that time; and as after the Civil War, the democrats created the Ku Klux Klan, promoting the racial discrimination for almost a century, strongly opposing racial integration during the government of Eisenhower; until in 1964, Lindon B. Johnson, understanding that it was inevitable and politically convenient for his party, agreed to such integration, demonstrating his true colors when he said: "We are going to have these ‘N****rs’ v****g for us in the next 200 years."
The creator of f*****m, Benito Mussolini, was a socialist, in fact he was a Marxist in a red shirt, with a left arm raised with a closed fist, sympathetic to Lenin, and venerating Marx. But this man, when the First World War is finished, makes an analysis on the betrayal of the slogan of the Second Socialist International that leads him to make his socialism nationalist. This is where f*****m and N**ism originated. The left from early began to use the derogatory acronym of "N**i", but if we listen to any speech of Hitler we will appreciate as always refers to the party or national-socialist movement (Nationalsozialismus), words that are perfectly understood in German. Hitler says: "We are socialists, we are enemies of the current capitalist economic system because it exploits the weak from the economic point of view, with their unequal salaries, with their indecent evaluation of a human being according to whether or not he has wealth, in instead of evaluating the responsibility and the performance of the person, and we are determined to destroy this capitalist system in all its aspects ".
The Italian National F*****t Party will seize power in 1922 and will serve as inspiration for Hitler and the rest of the national-socialist parties that will be created later on, which are known by the name of "f*****t" parties, often created with cadres that come from the socialist parties, just as in the case of the c*******ts. Both socialist movements are practically parallel in time, but the advantage will be for Lenin with his triumph in the Russian revolution of 1917 and the global impact of the first socialist state in the world. And it will be the revolutionary methods and the example of the Bolsheviks of Lenin that will give a strong push to all revolutionary and totalitarian socialism, which will also serve as an incentive and inspiration for the National Socialists, who will copy their methods and organization, without forgetting that they also came from Marxism; and like the Bolsheviks they will have trained and indoctrinated political cadres, an organization of m*****as, the seizure of power through e******ns and / or revolution (national, in this case), the creation of a state of totalitarian dictatorship (which the C*******ts, deceptively and cynically, call ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’, when in reality it is a dictatorship against the proletariat), the prohibition of the other political parties and the militant opposition to democratic liberalism.
For their part, Republicans use the word "liberal" in a pejorative way to refer to the militants of the Democratic Party, when they want to point out people who support radical liberalism or socialism, which is an insult to the true liberals, who are intensely h**ed by radicals and socialists. The correct way to call these individuals is: "radical", "socialist" or "c*******t". I do not understand how the true liberals in the Democratic Party can survive with the tendency of their current militants to social democracy. I also do not understand why they want to go towards socialism, which is an idea that has failed. I think that the American way of life is not perfect and that it can be improved, but it is indisputable that it is much better to the systems that prevail in other places, which is demonstrated by the number of people who want to migrate to this country, fleeing from countries where socialism reigns.