First Gun Confiscation K*****g Reported in Maryland (Page 2): But, but, but, but.......what about the sanctity of diversity?

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

debeda wrote:

And THAT is a perfect example of political correctness run insanely amok.

But, but, but, but.......what about the sanctity of diversity?

debeda

padremike wrote:

But, but, but, but.......what about the sanctity of diversity?

Ahhhhh...diverse this, suckas!!! If those were my children or children of my friends there'd have been a WHOLE lot less diversity there

redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX

debeda wrote:

Ahhhhh...diverse this, suckas!!! If those were my children or children of my friends there'd have been a WHOLE lot less diversity there

Amen. I wonder WHY the populace of that area did not revolt. Why were there no public lynchings? This has NOTHING to do with diversity. This has to do with CRIME. England does not seem to have learned it's lesson from 1776. If you don't protect your people, they will revolt.

debeda

redpill wrote:

Amen. I wonder WHY the populace of that area did not revolt. Why were there no public lynchings? This has NOTHING to do with diversity. This has to do with CRIME. England does not seem to have learned it's lesson from 1776. If you don't protect your people, they will revolt.

AGREE with every word

bggamers Loc: georgia

padremike wrote:

Absolutely nuts but it is the growing trend under Progressive Soviet style agenda.

Saw on OAN news this morning that in the first six months of 2018, London has experienced 39,300+ knife attacks. I never knew London was that crime laden.

It wasn't till recently when the invasion of their country started. Now they will have to take away every one's knives and shape objects

bggamers Loc: georgia

redpill wrote:

Amen. I wonder WHY the populace of that area did not revolt. Why were there no public lynchings? This has NOTHING to do with diversity. This has to do with CRIME. England does not seem to have learned it's lesson from 1776. If you don't protect your people, they will revolt.

They don't want to protect them this is the one world order take over when they get done destroying Europe we will be surrounded by Muslim countries.

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

woodguru wrote:

When the issue of mental health and a person'r fit... (show quote)

The fact is that anyone can make an anonymous accusation that then results in the confiscation of property (firearms) without due process. A person must prove, after the fact, that they are not a danger. Also, in many locations, the firearms are not returned to the owner and no compensation is given. We currently have processes to disarm dangerous individuals without violating any of their constitutional rights.

bggamers Loc: georgia

woodguru wrote:

When the issue of mental health and a person'r fit... (show quote)

Dont think that was the message if I'm not mistaken it's the law itself and the way its written makes it so the gun owner is guilty period unless he proves otherwise. These laws are working their way across the country and people need to watch the way they are written. And yes this could be problematic Americans tend to scan thing not read the whole of it and much can be missed if you are not READING the whole thing. Many in the goverment would like nothing better then to take all the guns we would be much more complacent if we were not a gun totten country.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

bggamers wrote:

Dont think that was the message if I'm not mistake... (show quote)

"Dont think that was the message if I'm not mistaken it's the law itself and the way its written makes it so the gun owner is guilty period unless he proves otherwise. These laws are working their way across the country and people need to watch the way they are written. And yes this could be problematic Americans tend to scan thing not read the whole of it and much can be missed if you are not READING the whole thing.

***** Many in the goverment would like nothing better then to take all the guns we would be much more complacent if we were not a gun totten country." - bggamers

Yep!

JoyV

woodguru wrote:

When the issue of mental health and a person'r fit... (show quote)

PROVE they are stable? And if someone feels scared enough the gun owner should not be allowed to own guns? NO!!!! The state needs to prove someone is UNstable. And just because someone says they are scared says more about their own state of mind than the gun owners. Maybe the scared person needs to go to their safe space with their coloring book!

JoyV

woodguru wrote:

Perhaps had he answered the door like a normal person he could have objected and proved that he poses no threat. I know people who have had guns confiscated and got them back.

A normal person answering pounding at their door at 5 am would be prepared for danger. He did just what a free citizen would normally do in those circumstances. Once he saw it was the cops, he put his gun down. So the cops had no reason to believe he presented a deadly threat after he lay his gun down.

I'll bet the same people who think answering you door when it is being pounded upon in the early hours with a gun justifies the cops k*****g them in their own house are the same ones who say the cops k*****g a suspect fleeing the cops who turns with a gun in hand is unjustified until they open fire on the cops. Especially if the armed suspect is black.

JoyV

debeda wrote:

And THAT is a perfect example of political correctness run insanely amok.

Too true!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

No room. Woodguru and his ilk have filled them.

JoyV wrote:

PROVE they are stable? And if someone feels scared enough the gun owner should not be allowed to own guns? NO!!!! The state needs to prove someone is UNstable. And just because someone says they are scared says more about their own state of mind than the gun owners. Maybe the scared person needs to go to their safe space with their coloring book!