Sicilianthing

'Toss Up' District v**ers answered they are willing to compromise on immigration, but not with a DACA-for-wall deal.
Here's the scary scenario:

Because Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats will control the House next year, and Donald Trump and Republicans will control the rest of the federal government, many people are speculating that the most logical immigration action would be the two sides trading a DACA amnesty for wall funding.

Sen. Graham (R-S.C.) who is likely to be the next chairman of the Judiciary Committee has been pushing the idea.

We at NumbersUSA think that would be an horrific deal for American workers and communities.

Fortunately, our polling of v**ers in "Toss Up" Districts last night and this morning found they apparently think the way we do on that compromise. (We commissioned the poll of 2,000 v**ers in 31 "Toss Up" congressional Districts that had been identified by Real Clear Politics last Friday as being the most competitive. These are the Districts -- and v**ers -- that largely determined who will control the House next year.)

In yesterday's e******n, v**ers in those Districts decided to replace a couple of Democrats with Republicans, replace a number of Republicans with Democrats, and keep other Republicans in place after hard-fought contests. (Read my first analysis of the results that I wrote at 4:30 this morning.)

But regardless of party, most were agreed on their dislike for the DACA-for-wall deal.

Here was the question we posed to those v**ers about the compromise that is being discussed:

QUESTION: Do you support another compromise being considered that would legalize certain young-adult i*****l i*******ts brought to the United States as children and would greatly increase walls and fencing on the Mexico border, but would keep total immigration at one million a year while continuing extended family migration and allowing employers to hire without checking legal status with E-Verify?
20% Yes to DACA-for-wall deal

58% No

Republicans didn't want a wall that badly (20% YES vs. 64% NO).

Democrats didn't want a DACA amnesty that badly (25% vs. 47%).

Hispanic v**ers didn't like it (29% to 48%), and Independents liked the compromise even less (13% vs. 66%).

GREAT SUPPORT FOR ANOTHER COMPROMISE

The DACA-for-wall compromise question was offered to v**ers immediately after offering them another compromise:

QUESTION: Do you support a compromise being considered by Congress that would give lifetime work permits to certain young adults who came to the United States illegally as children, and that also would reduce future immigration by ending extended family migration and by mandating that employers use E-Verify?
56% YES to this DACA for immigration reduction & mandatory E-Verify compromise

21% NO

The approval of this compromise was almost the exact reverse of the rejection of the other compromise.

The approval rate was Democrats (44%-26%), Independents (53%-23%), Hispanics (55%-22%), Republicans (68%-15%).

'TOSS UP' V**ERS WANT TO MANDATE E-VERIFY & END CHAIN MIGRATION
V**ers were asked about the importance of greatly increasing walls and fencing on the Mexican border, mandating E-Verify, punishing employers of i*****l w****rs and increasing deportations.

Mandating E-Verify received the greatest enthusiasm as a way to control i*****l i*********n.

QUESTION: In trying to control i*****l i*********n, how important is it to mandate that all employers use the electronic E-Verify system so only legal workers can obtain jobs?
89% said important (56% "very" & 23% "somewhat")

18% said not very important or not important

The ratio of support for the importance of mandating E-Verify was 65% vs. 29% for Democrats, 76% vs. 20% for Independents, and 71% vs.24% for Hispanics, and an incredible 93% vs. 6% for Republicans eager to stop law-breaking businesses from enticing i*****l i*********n.

Support for ending chain migration wasn't as overwhelming as for mandating E-Verify but still favored by nearly a 2-to-1 margin.

QUESTION: When individuals in other countries are allowed to immigrate to the United States because of their sk**l or humanitarian need, who should be able to eventually follow them?
65% Spouse and minor children only

27% Extended family in addition to spouse and minor children

As the survivors and the conquering challengers begin to converge on Washington the next couple of months, it will be easy for them to listen to false analysis of what the e******ns meant for the immigration issue, or to get involved in political gamemanship.

But the survey of citizens last night after they had v**ed needs to be thrust at every Member of Congress to remind them that the people who decided the fate of the House have some definite ideas about how to reform our immigration system.

New Actions
ROY BECK,
NUMBERSUSA PRESIDENT

Airforceone

Republicans will never agree to the evarifybsystem or DACA. There evangelical base will go ballistic if they every compromise on DACA. There wealthy corporate donors will go ballistic if the evarify system gets properly funded. They loose the ability to hire low wage workers without being fined. Republicans have already ran a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit in 2018!there is no way over the next two years there going to spend $58 billion for a wall nobody wants.

This country had a comprehensive immigration reform under Bush and Obama and on both occasions these bills were passed on a bi partisan v**e in the senate and Republican held houses blocked it from a v**e.

Not a chance either Republicans or democrats will touch chain migration.or birthright because that’s not the problem. The problem with our immigration is the number of people who come here on work visas, student visas, they fly here for a vacation, or smuggled through our ports of entry and these people never go back.

No body is flooding our borders like Trump would lead the American people to believe

Sicilianthing

>>>>

Uhhh, NO

Comprehensive Immigration Reform is old news and no longer works.
What part of ‘Your Gov’t is broken’ do you not understand ?

Yes you are right about the Republican Scumbags quagmire for the low wage workers, this is why I tell you Trump and the Base can’t have it both ways much longer, that’s not what he was hired to do.

The Bipartisan Process is c*********d in a ShamS**m counterproductive ‘Kick the Can down the road old school train of thought’ and no longer fixes our problems.

Yes we are under current steady flow invasion and it’s getting worse, I know this and so do others like TrucksterBud who travel the country to all major hubs and cities... you can see the Thousands of immigrant illegal scumbags on every corner everywhere...

Mass Deportations Need to begin and Trump better ramp it up starting January or his base will begin to fragment (which is already happening) especially since he hasn’t arrested anyone.

More on this later.