It's a slow news day for exposing the faux Christians of the right so I am forced to bash Donald J--which admittedly, is almost as much fun.
A federal judge (liberal no doubt) ordered the Trump organization to turn over financial records for their Washington hotel. Donald was trying to stop a lawsuit because he did what he normally does and refused to pay contractors who remodeled his hotel. I know you conservative admire how Donald makes his billions--until one of you works for him and you have to sue his ass to get .10 cents on the dollar. Now there was a time when I would question why anyone would call a thief a hero but today's conservatives aren't the Republicans of yesterday, are they...
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/court-ruling-requires-trump-organization-turn-hotel-records/story?id=58933100A federal judge in Maryland will allow Maryland and D.C. officials access to the Trump OrganizationâÂÂs business records, dealing another blow to President Donald TrumpâÂÂs effort to stop a lawsuit claiming his -- and his familyâÂÂs -- ownership of a Washington, D.C., hotel have put him at odds with the Constitution's prohibition on government officials accepting payments from foreign states without permission from Congress.
The plaintiffs in the case, the attorneys general of the District of Columbia and the state of Maryland, have alleged that their local businesses have suffered as a result of foreign governments seeking to do more business with the Trump International Hotel. The government insisted that Trump has done nothing wrong, and in particular, that there has been no quid pro quo.
Senior U.S. District Court Judge Peter Messitte on Friday denied the Justice DepartmentâÂÂs request to put the case on hold while the administration seeks an appeal, and he ordered the plaintiffs to present a schedule for accessing hotel records and other confidential materials within 20 days.
In a memorandum supporting his decision, the judge emphasized his continued disagreement with the Trump administration's interpretation of the Constitution's Emoluments Clause, enacted out of concern officials overseas might take gifts or bribes. âÂÂEven now it remains unclear, as it did in connection with the PresidentâÂÂs original motion to dismiss, exactly how he came to his view of the meaning of âÂÂemolument,âÂÂâ the judge wrote.
âÂÂWhat he said in his Motion to Dismiss and repeats now is that the President would have to receive payments for his services as President for the payments to qualify as prohibited âÂÂemoluments,â Messitte added. "By every reasonable metric, this appears to describe what is tantamount to a bribe, so above all else the PresidentâÂÂs definition of the term âÂÂemolumentâ is exceedingly strained.âÂÂ
The Constitution bars federal officials from taking emoluments from any âÂÂKing, Prince, or Foreign State.â ...yeah, right!
It's a slow news day for exposing the faux Christi... (