Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test results announced…
http://click2.thehornnews.com/t/Ag/hD8/AAEabg/-e8/AAG15g/ABdWjA/AQ/DSKf Responding to years of derision by political critics, Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Monday released a report on a DNA analysis that provides evidence she does, in fact, have some Native American heritage.
Warren is somwhere between 3% and 0.0019% Native American ancestry. That’s a bit less than previously claimed, but the test does leave open the possibility that her family story is true.
Sponsored: Eighty year-old prophecy uncovers dire warning for US
The analysis on the Massachusetts Democrat was done by Stanford University professor Carlos D. Bustamante. He concluded Warren’s ancestry is mostly European but says “the results strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor.”
Bustamante, a prominent expert in the field of DNA analysis, determined Warren’s pure Native American ancestor appears “in the range of six to 10 generations ago.”
That range does mesh with an 1894 document the New England Genealogical Society unearthed suggesting Warren’s great-great-great-grandmother, O.C. Sarah Smith, could have been partially Native American....
Best part is Trump bet her a million dollars now lets see if he pays!
eagleye13 wrote:
Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test results announced…
http://click2.thehornnews.com/t/Ag/hD8/AAEabg/-e8/AAG15g/ABdWjA/AQ/DSKf Responding to years of derision by political critics, Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Monday released a report on a DNA analysis that provides evidence she does, in fact, have some Native American heritage.
Warren is somwhere between 3% and 0.0019% Native American ancestry. That’s a bit less than previously claimed, but the test does leave open the possibility that her family story is true.
Sponsored: Eighty year-old prophecy uncovers dire warning for US
The analysis on the Massachusetts Democrat was done by Stanford University professor Carlos D. Bustamante. He concluded Warren’s ancestry is mostly European but says “the results strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor.”
Bustamante, a prominent expert in the field of DNA analysis, determined Warren’s pure Native American ancestor appears “in the range of six to 10 generations ago.”
That range does mesh with an 1894 document the New England Genealogical Society unearthed suggesting Warren’s great-great-great-grandmother, O.C. Sarah Smith, could have been partially Native American....
Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test results announced… br ... (
show quote)
eagleye13 wrote:
Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test results announced…
http://click2.thehornnews.com/t/Ag/hD8/AAEabg/-e8/AAG15g/ABdWjA/AQ/DSKf Responding to years of derision by political critics, Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Monday released a report on a DNA analysis that provides evidence she does, in fact, have some Native American heritage.
Warren is somwhere between 3% and 0.0019% Native American ancestry. That’s a bit less than previously claimed, but the test does leave open the possibility that her family story is true.
Sponsored: Eighty year-old prophecy uncovers dire warning for US
The analysis on the Massachusetts Democrat was done by Stanford University professor Carlos D. Bustamante. He concluded Warren’s ancestry is mostly European but says “the results strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor.”
Bustamante, a prominent expert in the field of DNA analysis, determined Warren’s pure Native American ancestor appears “in the range of six to 10 generations ago.”
That range does mesh with an 1894 document the New England Genealogical Society unearthed suggesting Warren’s great-great-great-grandmother, O.C. Sarah Smith, could have been partially Native American....
Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test results announced… br ... (
show quote)
Yes, it may be true that she has minuscule amounts of DNA that shows in her distant past she has Indian ancestry. It is enough that she can claim ancestry, but not enough to qualify as a member of a tribe, and it is not enough to qualify for minority status.
EmilyD wrote:
Yes, it may be true that she has minuscule amounts of DNA that shows in her distant past she has Indian ancestry. It is enough that she can claim ancestry, but not enough to qualify as a member of a tribe, and it is not enough to qualify for minority status.
Yep!!!
She Lied for special consideration as an Indian.
Lonewolf wrote:
Best part is Trump bet her a million dollars now lets see if he pays!
Bulls**t f**e news! The DNA test from fauxchontas is being widely touted by the media as "proof" that she has Native American ancestry.
It's all f**ery, of course. The test shows she has .098% Native American DNA. But the average "white" American has twice that: .18%.
If fauxchontas is a "woman of color," then nearly all white people are, too.
It's all just another f**e science h**x pushed by the media for political purposes.
Lonewolf wrote:
Best part is Trump bet her a million dollars now lets see if he pays!
That cheap thieving clod pays for little but hookers, he c***ts everyone else out of what he owes them.
eagleye13 wrote:
Yep!!!
She Lied for special consideration as an Indian.
Exactly. She changed her ethnicity from “white” to “Native American” both at University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she taught from 1987 to 1995, and at Harvard Law School, where she had tenure starting in 1995. Her own DNA test proves she had no right to make that claim!! The minimum requirement to claim membership in most Native American tribes ranges from 1/8 (12.5 percent) to 1/2 (50 percent). A few tribes have a minimum requirement of 1/16 (6 percent). She has at best 1 percent and at worst less than 0.1 percent.
Kevyn wrote:
That cheap thieving clod pays for little but hookers, he c***ts everyone else out of what he owes them.
What has that got to do with Pocahontas being 98% white?
Being of western pioneer stock, I have Black Foot Indian on both sides.
EmilyD wrote:
Yes, it may be true that she has minuscule amounts of DNA that shows in her distant past she has Indian ancestry. It is enough that she can claim ancestry, but not enough to qualify as a member of a tribe, and it is not enough to qualify for minority status.
IMHO, Without reservation, she will be without a "Reservation"
Mutton Dressed As Lamb wrote:
IMHO, Without reservation, she will be without a "Reservation"
All the colleges that gave her a student discount, should ask for reimbursements.
Same for the loans>
Should they let her slide on interest owed?
The Boston Globe did a story a few Sundays ago about weather or not she used her heratige to help her to get a position. According to that article, she never told any search committee that she was part Indian. I was surprised that her Native American heritage was so small. Her grandmother was on the Cherokee census.
As a typical trump stupid effort to offend someone, this has no foundation//
While this will not nudge the h**e filled right wingers who want her to be one more trump victem..
It is a silly and common family lore.. never was submitted for favors or even as background..
https://www.politifact.com/t***h-o-meter/article/2017/dec/01/facts-behind-elizabeth-warren-and-her-native-ameri/Before this controversy arose in 2012, there is no account that Warren spoke publicly of having Native American roots, although she called herself Cherokee in a local Oklahoma cookbook in 1984.
There is no dispute that Warren formally notified officials at the University of Pennsylvania and then Harvard claiming Native American heritage after she was hired.
Her detractors say she deployed a faux Native American connection to improve her chances of landing teaching jobs at two of the countryâs top law schools. However, there is no proof Warren gained any special advantage in her career.
Kevyn wrote:
That cheap thieving clod pays for little but hookers, he c***ts everyone else out of what he owes them.
Make your words sweet because someday you'll have to eat them!
Lonewolf wrote:
Best part is Trump bet her a million dollars now lets see if he pays!
He bet a million dollars that she was less than 6% native American. If she could prove through DNA testing that she was more than 6%, he would give her $1,000,000.00. She lost.
JoyV wrote:
He bet a million dollars that she was less than 6% native American. If she could prove through DNA testing that she was more than 6%, he would give her $1,000,000.00. She lost.
Did she take the bet? If so,
she owes
Trump a million dollars...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.