Tables have certainly turned on the left.
Tables have certainly turned on the left.
If the Democrats’ strategy was to manufacture a past that comes back to haunt opponents, their game plan to derail the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should have included accusers and witnesses who had untainted histories of their own.
Unfortunately for chief accuser Christine Blasey Ford, a man from her own past has gone public to allege some major holes in her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Those digging deep into Kavanaugh’s personal history to unearth any kind of scandal may have just been thwarted by a page from their own playbook.
Fox News and One America reported late Tuesday that a man has come forward to contradict many of the statements Ford made in her testimony last week.
The man, an ex-boyfriend of Ford, said she never told him of an alleged sexual assault by Kavanaugh in all of the six years that they dated.
Further, in the sworn statement, the man contradicts Ford’s testimony that she never helped anyone prepare for polygraph examinations or had a fear of flying or tight spaces and limited exits.
“In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination,” Fox News reported.
“The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her ‘life-long best friend’ prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office.
“He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a ‘very small,’ 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door — apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh’s alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.”
All of those statements contradict or cast serious question on, Ford’s testimony to the committee deciding Kavanaugh’s fate.
In particular, during her testimony, Ford was questioned about her experience with polygraphs several times by the prosecutor hired by committee Republicans. She denied ever helping anyone prepare to take a polygraph.
According to Fox, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Ford’s attorneys demanding they release: “therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than t***hful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday’s dramatic Senate hearing.”
This isn’t the first time differing statements have come from friends of Ford who knew her back in the day.
On Sept. 22, as Mairead McArdle noted at National Review, longtime Ford friend Leland Ingham Keyser denied statements that she attended the party in which Ford alleges the assault by Kavanaugh took place.
Howard Walsh, an attorney for Keyser said in a written statement: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
Perjury is a serious crime, and at this point, I would wonder if Ford isn’t getting a little nervous as figures from her past emerge to shoot down her testimony and paint a picture of a very non-credible individual.
As speculation surrounds the coming conclusion of the FBI investigation into the allegations against Kavanaugh, I wonder if there will be any consequence toward those who came forward with such questionable accusations against the judge. Not to worry, the left never get jail time it seems.
It shouldn’t be so easy to lie under oath.
Sadly she is just another lying Liberal.
And the left shouldn’t assume that their obstruction tactics will go unchallenged anymore.
Time to start charging witnesses with perjury and send them to the lockup, not the white collar type but where they might get a real life lesson.
Do you have the name of this boyfriend?
Capt-jack wrote:
Tables have certainly turned on the left.
If the Democrats’ strategy was to manufacture a past that comes back to haunt opponents, their game plan to derail the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should have included accusers and witnesses who had untainted histories of their own.
Unfortunately for chief accuser Christine Blasey Ford, a man from her own past has gone public to allege some major holes in her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Those digging deep into Kavanaugh’s personal history to unearth any kind of scandal may have just been thwarted by a page from their own playbook.
Fox News and One America reported late Tuesday that a man has come forward to contradict many of the statements Ford made in her testimony last week.
The man, an ex-boyfriend of Ford, said she never told him of an alleged sexual assault by Kavanaugh in all of the six years that they dated.
Further, in the sworn statement, the man contradicts Ford’s testimony that she never helped anyone prepare for polygraph examinations or had a fear of flying or tight spaces and limited exits.
“In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination,” Fox News reported.
“The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her ‘life-long best friend’ prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office.
“He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a ‘very small,’ 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door — apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh’s alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.”
All of those statements contradict or cast serious question on, Ford’s testimony to the committee deciding Kavanaugh’s fate.
In particular, during her testimony, Ford was questioned about her experience with polygraphs several times by the prosecutor hired by committee Republicans. She denied ever helping anyone prepare to take a polygraph.
According to Fox, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Ford’s attorneys demanding they release: “therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than t***hful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday’s dramatic Senate hearing.”
This isn’t the first time differing statements have come from friends of Ford who knew her back in the day.
On Sept. 22, as Mairead McArdle noted at National Review, longtime Ford friend Leland Ingham Keyser denied statements that she attended the party in which Ford alleges the assault by Kavanaugh took place.
Howard Walsh, an attorney for Keyser said in a written statement: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
Perjury is a serious crime, and at this point, I would wonder if Ford isn’t getting a little nervous as figures from her past emerge to shoot down her testimony and paint a picture of a very non-credible individual.
As speculation surrounds the coming conclusion of the FBI investigation into the allegations against Kavanaugh, I wonder if there will be any consequence toward those who came forward with such questionable accusations against the judge. Not to worry, the left never get jail time it seems.
It shouldn’t be so easy to lie under oath.
Sadly she is just another lying Liberal.
And the left shouldn’t assume that their obstruction tactics will go unchallenged anymore.
Tables have certainly turned on the left. br br I... (
show quote)
Polling by Rasmussen, Gallup and Quinnipiac is showing a significant increase in support FOR Kavanaugh, particularly among women, even democrats. The substance of the responses is that if a man's life, family and future can be destroyed by an accusation of sexual assault, without evidence, without corroborating witnesses, and without due process under the law, then no man is safe. The women responding to this poll are very worried that their husbands, sons, brothers and fathers are vulnerable to such malicious accusations.
Statistics on false allegations of sexual assault show an incredibly high number of incidents, but these statistics are based on incidents reported to authorities which are investigated and litigated in criminal or civil courts.
What the democrat low lifes have done to Kavanaugh is an unforgivable travesty. They have blown through a man's constitutional rights to a fair trial and presumption of innocence, they have stomped on the rule of law and driven a stake into his heart.
I've heard it suggested that a man asking a woman for a date should demand they both sign a notarized waiver that legally releases each party of any responsibility for what might happen.
Acidilous wrote:
Do you have the name of this boyfriend?
Go back and read the line that says, his name was redacted. Sheesh
Acidilous wrote:
Do you have the name of this boyfriend?
The Daily Caller News Foundation has identified Brian Merrick as the author of a letter alleging that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford gave inaccurate testimony about her experience with polygraphs to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Merrick and Blasey Ford dated throughout the 1990s and lived together for some time, but their relationship ended by the early 2000s.
A witness Merrick identified has denied the allegation he raised.
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The Daily Caller News Foundation has identified Brian Merrick as the author of a letter alleging that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford gave inaccurate testimony about her experience with polygraphs to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Merrick and Blasey Ford dated throughout the 1990s and lived together for some time, but their relationship ended by the early 2000s.
A witness Merrick identified has denied the allegation he raised.
One of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford friends has stated that Christine bragger to her that she bedded 64 boys from 11th grade to graduating college. cool
Capt-jack wrote:
One of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford friends has stated that Christine bragger to her that she bedded 64 boys from 11th grade to graduating college. cool
If they were lefty soy boys she'd have to go through that many to find one that worked.
At 5:00 PM today Kavanaugh will be a judge on the Supreme Court of the United States.
And on top of that, the GOP has grown a set of BALLS.
Capt-jack wrote:
At 5:00 PM today Kavanaugh will be a judge on the Supreme Court of the United States.
And on top of that, the GOP has grown a set of BALLS.
Let's hope they keep them. Democrats wear their pink hats on their heads, republicans put them in their pants.
Mostly Wusses anyway, eager to please their morally superior democrats.
It's been the way for years, this is but one change. Hope it lasts.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.