Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa

Fox News contributor fired after calling Brett Kavanaugh's accusers 'lying skanks'

A Fox News contributor lost his gig at the network after attacking the women who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

Kevin Jackson went on a Twitter tirade Thursday during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, attacking Christine Blasey Ford and the two other women who have gone public with claims about the Supreme Court justice nominee.

“Feminists are their own worst enemies, and enemy of women, Also, they want men to NEVER be believed. I’m not succumbing,” he tweeted. “TO HELL with the notion that women must be believed no matter what. Lying skanks is what these 3 women are, and we ALL know more.”

http://www.gopusa.com/fox-news-contributor-fired-after-calling-brett-kavanaughs-accusers-lying-skanks/#comment-264000

Robert Harrington

Carol Kelly

I wouldn’t have fired him for that. It was simply the t***h and probably 65 to 70% of the people out here,if honest, would agree with him. Wh**ever happened to “fair and balanced”? I believe that was the Fox motto!

Robert Harrington

Probably...only works in horseshoes. Facts are what count. You ask “what ever happened to fair and balanced”? At Fox those words have never been a reality. Try another channel.

Carol Kelly

Which one would you suggest. The rest are worse all the time. Catch Fox after hours.

woodguru

What is "the t***h" about calling someone something that is totally unnecessary? Does skank have a definition that makes his statement "the t***h".

This is what's wrong with people on the right, they have no decency and will defend virtually anything, including p*******es like Roy Moore.

FOX is trying to clean up their act and do the right thing

Justsss Loc: Wisconsin

wood, you’ve turned into some real f**kless sk**k when you charge Judge Roy Moore with p********a. Where are all of his accusers today ? They all disappeared into the sewer they came from. Just like these accusers of kavanaugh(who I don’t want, but that’s not this discussion).
You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself if that’s possible. The demoncraps used this technique and it worked. Just like they tried to use I-need-a-hill against Judge Thomas.
I’m not saying that republican’ts aren’t as bad but Judge Roy Moore is an honorable man who was destroyed by feckless c@@ts and you know it and if you don’t than there’s no hope for you.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

Ah woodsie, your hypocrisy knows no bounds, as is what most l*****t socialist democrats do. Where is your outrage toward the lying skank Hillary Clinton when she destroyed the lives of multiple women accusing her pervert husband of rape and sexual assaults? As it always is with you and your ilk, you conveniently have selective memory, forget or lie about anything even remotely derogatory regarding a democrat. Booker and Ellison are glaring cases in point.

woodguru

"Honorable" men don't get taken off the bench twice for failing to adhere to the law, they don't "date" underaged girls.

The evidence that goes against him can't be used to put him in jail, but the things like him getting kicked out of a mall for hitting on under aged school girls are part of a history and pattern. He was kicked off of the bench twice for blatant failures to adhere to the law and constitution. Again not groundless allegations.

When stories, proven or otherwise surface it means something, he is scum and so are people who defend him. I don't try to defend any of the dems that actually have done something unacceptable, Weiner needed to go because he lied, Clinton same thing, to me a blow job was not reason to impeach him, lying was. And where does that leave Trump? Impeached a long time ago for the individual cases where he blatantly lied about his position in things that came out.

When was the last time you said a republican has to go because they lied? Of course you see no problem with liars, dems lie so yours can too.

Judge Thomas is a partisan piece of trash that refuses to recuse himself from Monsanto cases as he should considering he was a a monsanto attorney. He should have been impeached when he failed to claim $750k of his wife's income, not for the tax evasion it was, but because she made the money working as a lobbyist for a case that was before Thomas.

All of the questionable justice confirmations that went through have resulted in highly questionable cases where the interests of the constitution have not been well served.

The republican party is in trouble, and the trouble stems from the fact that there is literally no immoral thing you will call on your people you support. Gingrich was caught red handed taking graft, and was kicked out of his job and fined, McCain had an admitted part of the Keating scandal and never should have served another day in public office.

That "Judge" Roy had the support he did is an indictment on the moral character of people who supported him.

FOX is trying to clean up their moral act and the Trump supporting base will crucify them for it, they want and proudly support scum

woodguru

In the first place I have supported getting rid of the majority of dems involved in scandals, I support close to a zero tolerance on our side and wish republicans would start doing the same. It's frustrating when actively supporting the removal of someone like Weiner only to see republicans do worse and their party doesn't seem to give a damn.

All I can speculate because nothing else makes sense, is that hard right wingers are smart enough to know when someone does something that's not right, they choose to accept it when their guys do things.

Not being a hypocrite, I saw nothing wrong with Clinton getting a blow job, I thought he should be impeached for lying about it. I saw nothing wrong with Trump having an affair or mistress or wh**ever with a porn star that warranted impeachment, even paying her to keep quiet. But the way he lied about every aspect at every turn warrants impeachment. I supported impeaching Clinton for lying and I'll support impeaching Trump for wh**ever it takes because he is a liar. There's things politicians lie about, and there's things that are crossing a line as far as public trust. Standing on Air Force One and denying an affair or paying an NDA is too far, how do we trust anything else he says about things like Russian meddling? We can't and it's unacceptable

federally indicted mattoid

Try non-corporate Democracy Now.
They report news, without puff pieces. It's gritty and depressing, but the t***h.

Justsss Loc: Wisconsin

[quote=woodguru]"Honorable" men don't get taken off the bench twice for failing to adhere to the law, they don't "date" underaged girls.

*woody, Judge Roy Moore was removed from the bench twice. That you’re correct about. Once for installing the 10 Commandments in the Court House. Second, for not accepting the unconstitutional f*ggot Act, (and you have the nerve to say that Judge Clarence Thomas should’ve recused himself) how about ginsberg recusing herself along with sotomayor on that mess? Or because their democraps it’s ok ?

*Well woody you’re allowed your opinion no matter how pinheaded it maybe snowflake.
If you’re so off on this it makes me wonder how many fingers you have left missy guru.

*So I guess you’re ok with feinberg and her Chinese spy( chauffeur BLAH HAHA HA

*woody,
There’s plenty of replublicant’s that need to go especially those rinos that are actually demoncraps. john mcstains is where he belongs and it can’t happen fast enough for plenty more of them.

*woodie, You’re very correct. Those who supported an HONEST Judge who fell to the worst feckless whores that the morally bankrupt demoncraps could dig up speaks volumes. Those who supported the whores are not only dirtbags but proved themselves morally & ethically lacking to the point of no return or of any

*woodie,
Oh give me a break. You mean faux news along with all the other c*******t communications?
If you’ve missed it only 6 companies own all the major papers, tv & radio. So why not get your information from real sources not the bought & paid for ?

*In closing I’d be happy to see approx. 520/30 of the 545 removed forcibly, put in prison or hung from lampposts.