crazylibertarian wrote:
I hope you realize that we are very much on the same wavelength. You & I shudder at the words progressive or liberal because we have thought it through but with the general public there is no such reaction, usually.
Take care & you are one of the people on OPP I look forward to hearing from and you're part of the group that has responded to this article.
Thanks CL. I see no signs of craziness, but artful thinking.
Manning345 wrote:
Thanks CL. I see no signs of craziness, but artful thinking.
Thank Manning 345. I'll bore you with the details of the screen name.
I went to NYU, one of the most radical schools in the country. They told me I was a lunatic for my views so when it came to an internet screen name, I figured I might as well accept that I'm a lunatic, hence the screen name.
crazylibertarian wrote:
Thank Manning 345. I'll bore you with the details of the screen name.
I went to NYU, one of the most radical schools in the country. They told me I was a lunatic for my views so when it came to an internet screen name, I figured I might as well accept that I'm a lunatic, hence the screen name.
Ah! Now I understand. Either a Libertarian or a Conservative in that school would be characterized as a lunatic. I just might be CrazyM at that! Nice to meet another crazy!
crazylibertarian wrote:
No one has confronted any American with the bloody history of socialism in the twentieth century, the bloodiest century ever. No one has asked this most crucial question; what type of socialism do you espouse, national socialism, soviet socialism or some other kind?
Excellent post. Just one disagreement, in reference to the part quoted above. Actually the l*****ts have made a distinction between the old, yucky, messy, murdering socialism/c*******m (of the USSR, China, Cuba, Cambodia, and everywhere else it's been tried and failed) and the new, shiny, neat, murdering Democratic Socialism they now support.
What you fail to comprehend is that this new Democratic Socialism, which has all the features of the old national socialism, and soviet socialism, will work this time because it's name has the word Democratic in it.
Maybe this graphic showing the difference will help:
Voice of Reason wrote:
Excellent post. Just one disagreement, in reference to the part quoted above. Actually the l*****ts have made a distinction between the old, yucky, messy, murdering socialism/c*******m (of the USSR, China, Cuba, Cambodia, and everywhere else it's been tried and failed) and the new, shiny, neat, murdering Democratic Socialism they now support.
What you fail to comprehend is that this new Democratic Socialism, which has all the features of the old national socialism, and soviet socialism, will work this time because it's name has the word Democratic in it.
Maybe this graphic showing the difference will help:
Excellent post. Just one disagreement, in referenc... (
show quote)
We can point to the Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela, and many other Socialist failures and they will point to Scandinavia as success stories. Yet those Scandinavian countries themselves point out that they are more capitalistic than socialist.
son of witless wrote:
We can point to the Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela, and many other Socialist failures and they will point to Scandinavia as success stories. Yet those Scandinavian countries themselves point out that they are more capitalistic than socialist.
And, with the influx of refugees, their welfare states are crumbling while the violent crime rate soars.
Voice of Reason wrote:
And, with the influx of refugees, their welfare states are crumbling while the violent crime rate soars.
Facts have no bearing when you are committed to your cause and when you are crazy enough to be committed.
son of witless wrote:
Facts have no bearing when you are committed to your cause and when you are crazy enough to be committed.
Nor do morals, ethics or honesty.
Voice of Reason wrote:
Nor do morals, ethics or honesty.
Morals serve no useful purpose when you are at war and they are at war. In war you lie to your enemies, and friends if you have to.
Voice of Reason wrote:
That's true.
We who have ethics are the problem. We have not learned to deal with psychopaths.
son of witless wrote:
We who have ethics are the problem. We have not learned to deal with psychopaths.
This is quite true. We don't even recognize psychopathic behavior when we see it in real life, on TV, or in the papers. Their behavior registers as sort of annoying and not applicable in one's own sphere, but somewhere else far away like San Francisco. The closer to home it gets, however, the sharper our reactions. We have a very large country!
Manning345 wrote:
This is quite true. We don't even recognize psychopathic behavior when we see it in real life, on TV, or in the papers. Their behavior registers as sort of annoying and not applicable in one's own sphere, but somewhere else far away like San Francisco. The closer to home it gets, however, the sharper our reactions. We have a very large country!
Psychopaths have no empathy or conscience towards others.
son of witless wrote:
Psychopaths have no empathy or conscience towards others.
That is also true, but they are good at faking it. In fact, that's what Democrats DO.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.