Fox News Poll: Record number opposes Kavanaugh nomination
Sep 26, 2018 15:15:54 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-poll-record-number-221559468.html
Politics
Fox News Poll: Record number opposes Kavanaugh nomination
FOX News Videos 20 hours ago
Fox News Poll: Record number opposes Kavanaugh nomination
V**er support for Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court is down in the wake of Christine Ford’s assault allegations, as more believe her than him. Currently, 40 percent of v**ers would confirm Kavanaugh, while 50 percent oppose him, according to a Fox News poll.
Politics
Fox News Poll: Record number opposes Kavanaugh nomination
FOX News Videos 20 hours ago
Fox News Poll: Record number opposes Kavanaugh nomination
V**er support for Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court is down in the wake of Christine Ford’s assault allegations, as more believe her than him. Currently, 40 percent of v**ers would confirm Kavanaugh, while 50 percent oppose him, according to a Fox News poll.
Sep 26, 2018 15:26:15 #
Bad Bob wrote:
What do you expect when all they hear from the MSM is one side? All Democrats would oppose him without any allegations.
Sep 26, 2018 15:30:37 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you expect when all they hear from the MSM is one side? All Democrats would oppose him without any allegations.
Silly, that is a FOX poll.
Sep 26, 2018 16:00:34 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
What do you expect when all they hear from the MSM is one side? All Democrats would oppose him without any allegations.
You have that right, they would oppose him for lying in confirmation hearings...and for biased political rulings that were overturned because they were so bad.
Yes he was opposed before these credible allegations, so dump the turd and stop with the blind support for your party. Why is it so hard to call a turd a turd?
Sep 26, 2018 16:17:44 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
woodguru wrote:
You have that right, they would oppose him for lying in confirmation hearings...and for biased political rulings that were overturned because they were so bad.
Yes he was opposed before these credible allegations, so dump the turd and stop with the blind support for your party. Why is it so hard to call a turd a turd?
Yes he was opposed before these credible allegations, so dump the turd and stop with the blind support for your party. Why is it so hard to call a turd a turd?
Nothing but blind tribalism.
Sep 26, 2018 18:02:45 #
woodguru wrote:
You have that right, they would oppose him for lying in confirmation hearings...and for biased political rulings that were overturned because they were so bad.
Yes he was opposed before these credible allegations, so dump the turd and stop with the blind support for your party. Why is it so hard to call a turd a turd?
Yes he was opposed before these credible allegations, so dump the turd and stop with the blind support for your party. Why is it so hard to call a turd a turd?
Show the credibility of the "allegations" there, Mr. Woody Wood Parrot.
All "witnesses" have denied them, and the only ones maintaining them are the well paid accusers, their lawyers, the democrats, and the media, who all use the same phrase in regards to this fiasco. "Credibly accused."
It's all hearsay.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.